Critical values in anatomic pathology: How do we communicate?

American Journal of Clinical Pathology

Volumn 122, Issue 2, 2004, Pages 171-172

  LiVolsi, Virginia A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AGED; CASE REPORT; CLINICAL PRACTICE; EDITORIAL; ENDOMETRIUM CARCINOMA; FEMALE; HOSPITAL INFORMATION SYSTEM; HUMAN; INTERDISCIPLINARY COMMUNICATION; INTERNAL MEDICINE; LABORATORY TEST; LAW SUIT; MEDICAL ERROR; PAPANICOLAOU TEST; PATHOLOGY; POLICY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RADIODIAGNOSIS; TECHNOLOGY;

EID: 3242801154     PISSN: 00029173     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1309/G1C51DYVMPDJ3DD7     Document Type: Editorial

References (2)

1. Berlin L. Are radiologists contracted by third parties to interpret radiographs liable for not communicating results? AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2002;178:27-33.
2. Pereira TC, Liu Y, Silverman JF. Critical values in surgical pathology. Am J Clin Pathol. 2004;122:201-205.