Genetic relationships among Aster species by multivariate analysis and AFLP markers

Hereditas

Volumn 140, Issue 3, 2004, Pages 193-200

  Cammareri, M ^a   Errico, A ^b   Sebastiano, A ^b   Conicella, Clara ^a  

^a CNR   (Italy)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NAPLES FEDERICO II   (Italy)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DNA FRAGMENT; PLANT DNA; PRIMER DNA;

AMPLIFIED FRAGMENT LENGTH POLYMORPHISM; ARTICLE; ASTERACEAE; CHROMOSOME NUMBER; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORRELATION COEFFICIENT; DIPLOIDY; DISCRIMINANT ANALYSIS; GAMETE; GENE AMPLIFICATION; GENE CLUSTER; GENETIC MARKER; GENETIC SIMILARITY; GENETIC VARIABILITY; GENUS; GEOGRAPHIC DISTRIBUTION; MORPHOLOGICAL TRAIT; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; NONHUMAN; PLANT BREEDING; PLANT EVOLUTION; PLANT GENETICS; PLANT LEAF; PLANT MORPHOLOGY; PLANT REPRODUCTION; PLOIDY; POLLEN ANALYSIS; POLLEN DEVELOPMENT; POLYPLOIDY; SPECIES DIFFERENCE; SPECIES DIVERSITY; SPECIES IDENTIFICATION; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE;

ASTER PLANT; CHROMOSOMES; CLUSTER ANALYSIS; DNA, PLANT; GENETIC MARKERS; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; POLYMORPHISM, RESTRICTION FRAGMENT LENGTH; VARIATION (GENETICS);

AMELLUS; ASTER; ASTER ALPINUS; ASTER AMELLUS; ASTERACEAE; CAPITULUM; EMBRYOPHYTA;

EID: 3242795155     PISSN: 00180661     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1601-5223.2004.01777.x     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Bertin, R. I. and Kerwin, M. A. 1998. Floral sex ratios and gynomonoecy in Aster (Asteraceae). - Am. J. Bot. 85: 235-244.
2. Cammareri, M., Errico, A., Filippone, E. et al. C. 2001a. Screening of Aster germplasm for in vitro response to regeneration. - J. Genet. Breed. 55: 255-260.
3. Cammareri, M., Fusco, M., Errico, A. et al. 2001b. Polyploidization events induced by interspecific hybridization in Aster spp. - Proc. 44th Meeting Italian Soc. Agric. Genet., September, Salsomaggiore, Italy.
4. Carputo, D., Frusciante, L. and Peloquin, S. J. 2003. The role of 2n gametes and endosperm balance number in the origin and evolution of polyploids in the tuber-bearing Solanums. - Genetics 163: 287-294.
5. Chmielewski, J. G. 1991. Inter-relationships among cytotype and achene characteristics in Aster lanceolatus Willd. (Asteraceae). - Beitrage-zur-Biologie-der-Pflanzen. 66: 69-84.
6. Cronquist, A. 1981. An integrated system of classification of flowering plants. - Columbia Univ. Press.
7. Doyle, J. J., Doyle, J. L. and Bailey, L. H. 1990. Isolation of plant DNA from fresh tissue. - Focus 12: 13-15.
8. Everitt, B. 1974. Cluster analysis. - Heinemann Educational Books Ltd., London, UK.
9. Harlan, J. R. and deWet, J. M. 1975. On Ö. Winge and a prayer: the origins of polyploidy. - Bot. Rev. 42: 361-390.
10. Jansen, R. K., Michaels, H. J. and Palmer, J. D. 1991. Phylogeny and character evolution in the Asteraceae based on chloroplast DNA restriction site mapping. Syst. Bot. 16: 98-115.
11. Johnson, R. A. and Whichern, D. W. 1992. Applied multivariate statistical analysis. - Prentice Hall Inc.
12. Nesom, G. L. 1994a. Subtribal classification of the Astereae (Asteraceae). - Phytologia 76: 193-274.
13. Nesom, G. L. 1994b. Review of the taxonomy of Aster sensu lato (Asteraceae: Astereae), emphasizing the New World species. - Phytologia 77: 141-297.
14. Noyes, R. D. and Rieseberg, L. H. 1999. ITS sequence data support a single origin for North American Astereae (Asteraceae) and reflect deep geographic divisions in Aster s.1. - Am. J. Bot. 86: 398-412.
15. Mace, E. S., Gebhardt, C. G. and Lester, R. N. 1999. AFLP analysis of genetic relationships in the tribe Datureae (Solanaceae). - Theor. Appl. Genet. 99: 634-641.
16. Rohlf, F. J. 2000. NTSYSpc. Numerical taxonomy and multivariate analysis system. Version 2. 1. Exeter Software. - Applied Biostatistics Inc., New York, USA.
17. Seaman, F. C. 1982. Sesquiterpene lactones as taxonomic characters in the Asteraceae. - Bot. Rev. 48: 121-595.
18. Semple, J. C., Chmielewski, J. G. and Chinappa, C. 1983. Chromosome numbers determination in Aster L. (Compositae) with comments on cytogeography, phylogeny and chromosome morphology. - Am. J. Bot. 70: 1432-1443.
19. Semple, J. C., Chmielewski, J. G. and Lana, M. A. 1989. Chromosome numbers in Fam. Compositae, Tribe Astereae. III. Additional counts and comments on generic limits and ancestral base-numbers. - Rhodora 91: 296-314.
20. Semple, J. C. 1995. A review of hypotheses on ancestral chromosomal base-number in the Astereae and the genus Aster. - In: Hind, D. J. N., Jeffrey, C. and Popo, G. V. (eds), Advances in Compositae systematics. R. Bot. Garden, Kew, UK, p. 153-165.
21. Shao, Y., Ho, C. T, Chin, C. K. et al. 1997. Triterpenoid saponins from Aster lingulatus. - Phytochemistry 44: 337-340.
22. Sirohi, R S. and Behera, T. K. 2000. Genetic variability in Chrysanthemum. - J. Ornamental Horticult. (New Ser.) 3: 34-36.
23. Sneath, P. H. A. and Sokal, R. R. 1973. Numerical taxonomy: the principles and practice of numerical classification. - Freeman & Co.
24. Sokal, R. R. and Sneath, P. H. A. 1963. Principles of numerical taxonomy. - Freeman & Co.
25. Stucky, J. and Jackson, R. C. 1975. DNA content of seven species of Astereae and its significance to theories of chromosome evolution in the tribe. - Am. J. Bot. 62: 509-518.
26. Turner, B. L., Ellison, W. L. and King, R. M. 1961. Chromosome numbers in Compositae. IV. North American species with phyletic interpretation. - Am. J. Bot. 48: 216-233.
27. Turner, B. L. and Horne, D. 1964. Taxonomy of Machaeranthera section Psilactis (Compositae-Astereae). - Brittonia 16: 127-128.
28. Uno, Y., Urao, T., Yamaguchi-Shinozaki, K. et al. 1998. Early salt-stress effects on expression of genes for aquaporin homologues in the halophyte sea aster (Aster tripolium L.). - J. Plant Res. 111: 411-419.
29. Vos, P., Hogers, R., Bleekerm, M. et al. 1995. AFLP: a new techique for DNA fingerprinting. - Nucleic Acids Res. 23: 4407-4414.
30. Wilkinson, L., Hill, M. A. and Vang, E. 1992. SYSTAT: Statistics. Version 5.2. - SYSTAT, Inc.
31. Xiang, C. and Semple, J. D. 1996. Molecular systematic study of Aster sensu lato and related genera (Asteraceae: Astereae) based on chloroplast DNA restriction site analyses and mainly North American taxa.-In: Hind, D. J. N. and Beentje, H. J. (eds), Compositae: systematics. Vol. 1. - Proc. Int. Compositae Conf., Kew, 1994. R. Bot. Garden, Kew, UK. p. 393-423.