Enhanced rough sets rule reduction algorithm for classification digital mammography

Journal of Intelligent Systems

Volumn 13, Issue 2, 2004, Pages 151-171

  Hassanien, Aboul Ella ^a   Ali, Jafar M H ^a  

^a KUWAIT UNIVERSITY   (Kuwait)

Author keywords

Decision trees; Feature extraction and reduction; Gray level co occurrence matrices; Rule generation; Similarity measure; Texture feature extraction

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHMS; DIGITAL SIGNAL PROCESSING; FEATURE EXTRACTION; IMAGE SEGMENTATION; MAMMOGRAPHY; ROUGH SET THEORY;

DECISION TREES; FEATURE REDUCTION; GRAY LEVEL COOCCURRENCE MATRICES; RULE GENERATION; SIMILARITY MEASURES; TEXTURE FEATURE EXTRACTION;

KNOWLEDGE ENGINEERING;

EID: 3242783207     PISSN: 03341860     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1515/JISYS.2004.13.2.151     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Ahuja, N. and Rosefeld, A. 1978. A note on the use of second-order gray-level statistics for threshold selection. IEEE Trans. Systems, Man, and Cybernatics, SMC-8912, 895-898.
2. Ali, J. and Hassanien, A. 2004. Mathematical morphology approach for enhancement digital mammography images, IASTED, International Conference on Biomedical Engineering (BioMED2004) February 16-18, In: Innsbruck, Austria. Cancer Net Home Page of the National Cancer Institute. Retrieved August 2002, from http://biomed.nus.sg
3. National Cancer Institute. 2002. Cancer Net Home Page of the National Cancer Institute. Retrieved August 2002, from http://biomed.nus.sg
4. Grzymala-Busse, J., Pawlak, Z., Slowinski, R. and Ziarko, W. 1999. Rough Sets, Communications of the ACM, 38, 88-95.
5. Hand, D.J., Mannila, H. and Smyth, P. 2000. Principles of Data Mining, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA, MIT Press.
6. Haralick, R.M. 1979. Statistical and structural approaches to texture, Proceeding of the IEEE, 67, 5.
7. Hassanien, A. 2004. Rough Set approach for attribute reduction and rule generation: a case of patients with suspected breast cancer, Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology (JASIST) (in press).
8. The Mammography Image Analysis Society. 2003. Mini mammography database, Retreived January 2003, from http://www.wiau.man.ac.uk/ services/MIAS/MIASmini. html.
9. Jelonek J., Krawiec K., Slowinski R., and Szymas J. 1995. Rough set reduction of features for picture-based reasoning, in: Soft Computing: Rough Sets, Fuzzy Logic, Neural Networks, Uncertainty Management, Knowledge Discovery, edited by Lin, T.Y. and Wildberger, A, Inc., San Diego CA, Simulation Councils, Inc., 89-92.
10. Jelonek, J., Krawiec, K., Slowinski, R., Stefanowski, J., and Szymas, J. 1993. Neural networks and rough sets - comparison and combination for classification of histological pictures, in: Rough Sets, Fuzzy Sets and Knowledge Discovery, edited by Ziarko, W, Proceedings of the International. Workshop on Rough Sets and Knowledge Discovery (RSKD'93), Banff, Alberta, Canada, October 12-15, Berlin, Germany, Springer-Verlag, 426-433.
11. Kok, S.L. 2003. Computer Interpretation of X-ray Mammography, Department of Engineering Science, University of Oxford, UK, web site http://www.eng.ox.ac. uk.
12. Kryszkiewicz, M., and Rybinski, H. 1993. Finding reducts in composed information systems, in: Rough Sets, Fuzzy Sets and Knowledge Discovery, edited by Ziarko, W, Proceedings of the International Workshop on Rough Sets and Knowledge Discovery (RSKD'93), Banff, Alberta, Canada, October 12-15, Berlin, Germany, Springer-Verlag, 261-273.
13. Lavrac N. 1999. Machine learning for data mining in medicine, AIMDM'99, 47-64.
14. Liu, S., Babbs, C.F. and Delp, E.J. 1998. Normal mammogram analysis and recognition. Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Image Processing, October 4-7, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
15. Mari, P., Bogdan, C. Moncef, G. and Ari, V. 2002. Rock texture retrieval using gray level co-occurrence matrix. NORSIG-2002, 5th NORDIC Signal Processing Symposium, October 4-7, Norway.
16. Nico, K. Martin, T. Jan, H. and Leon, V. E. 1998. Digital mammography: computational imaging and vision, 13, Kluwer academic publication.
17. Pawlak, Z. 1982. Rough sets. International Journal of Computer and Information Science, 11, 341-356.
18. Slowinski, R. 1995. Rough set approach to decision analysis, AI Expert, 19-25.
19. Yaffe, M. 2000. Digital mammography, TheFifth International Workshop on Digital Mammography, IWDM'2000, June 11-14, Toronto, Canada.
20. Zhi-Hua, Z., Yuan, J. and Shi-Fu, C. 2000. Extracting symbolic rules from trained neural network ensembles. AI Communications, IOS Press, 1-14.