The sizes of internal jugular veins in Turkish children aged between 7 and 12 years

International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology

Volumn 68, Issue 8, 2004, Pages 1059-1062

  Yildirim, Ilhami ^a   Yüksel, Mürvet ^a   Okur, Nazan ^a   Okur, Erdogan ^a   Kýliç, M Akif ^a  

^a KAHRAMANMARAS SUTCU IMAM UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

Jugular phlebectasia; Jugular vein; Valsalva maneuver; Vein diameter

Indexed keywords

AGE DISTRIBUTION; ANATOMY; ARTICLE; BREATHING; CONTROLLED STUDY; CRICOID; DIAGNOSTIC PROCEDURE; ECHOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; IMAGING SYSTEM; INTERNAL JUGULAR VEIN; LEARNING; MALE; NORMAL HUMAN; PEDIATRICS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REST; SCHOOL CHILD; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; STUDENT T TEST; TURKEY (REPUBLIC); VALSALVA MANEUVER; VARICOSIS; VASCULAR DISEASE; VEIN DIAMETER;

CHILD; CRICOID CARTILAGE; FEMALE; HUMANS; JUGULAR VEINS; MALE; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; REFERENCE VALUES; TURKEY; VALSALVA MANEUVER;

EID: 3242781776     PISSN: 01655876     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2004.04.004     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Mortensen J.D., Talbot S., Burkart J.A. Cross-sectional internal diameters of human cervical and femoral blood vessels: relationship to subject's sex, age, body size. Anat. Rec. 226:1990;115-124
2. Stickle B.R., McFarlane H. Prediction of a small internal jugular vein by external jugular vein diameter. Anaesthesia. 52:1997;220-222
3. Gordon D.H., Judith S.R., Kottmeier P., Levin D.C. Jugular venous ectasia in children: a report of 3 cases and review of the literature. Radiology. 118:1976;147-149
4. Gurpinar A., Kiristioglu I., Dogruyol H. Jugular phlebectasia. Eur. J. Pediatr. Surg. 9:1999;182-183
5. Leung A., Hampson S.J., Chir B., Singh M.P., Carr D. Ultrasonic diagnosis of bilateral congetinal internal venous aneursyms. Br. J. Radiol. 56:1983;588-591
6. Kovanlikaya I., Gunbay M.U., Pirnar T., Ceryan K. Swollen neck in children: a report of two cases. Pediatr. Radiol. 20:1990;485-486
7. Botero M., White S.E., Younginer J.G., Lobato E.B. Effects of trendelenburg position and positive intrathoracic pressure on internal jugular vein cross-sectional area in anesthetized children. J. Clin. Anesth. 13:2001;90-93
8. Verghese S.T., Nath A., Zenger D., Patel R.I., Kaplan R.F., Patel K.M. The effects of the simulated Valsalva maneuver, liver compression, and/or Trendelenburg position on the cross-sectional area of the internal jugular vein in infants and young children. Anesth. Analg. 94:2002;250-254
9. Jeon C.W., Choo M.J., Bae I.H., Shin S.O., Choi Y.S., Lee D.W. Diagnostic criteria of internal jugular phlebectasia in Korea children. Yonsei Med. J. 43:2002;329-334
10. Chao H.S., Wong K.S., Lin S.J., Kong M.S., Lin T.Y. Ultrasonographic diagnosis and color flow doppler sonography of internal jugular venous ectasia in children. J. Ultrasound Med. 18:1999;411-416
11. Bazaral M., Harlan S. Ultrasonographic anatomy of the internal jugular vein relevant to percutaneous cannulation. Crit. Care Med. 9:1981;307-310
12. Jasinski R.W., Rubin J.M. CT and ultrasonographic findings in jugular vein ectasia. J. Ultrasound Med. 3:1984;417-420
13. Dresser L.P., McKinney W.M. Anatomic and pathophysiologic studies of the human internal jugular valve. Am. J. Surg. 154:1987;220-224
14. Armstrong P.J., Sutherland R., Scott D.H. The effect of position and different manoeuvres on internal jugular vein diameter size. Acta Anaesthesiol. Scand. 38:1994;229-231
15. Mallory D.L., Shawker T., Evans R.G., McGee W.T., Brenner M., Parker M., Morrison G., Mohler P., Veremakis C., Parrillo J.E. Effects of clinical maneuvers on sonographically determined internal jugular vein size during venous cannulation. Crit. Care Med. 18:1990;1269-1273
16. Fleischer F., Fleischer E., Krier C. Internal jugular vein catheters-success rate and complications with reference to educational status. Anasthesiologie Intensivmedizin, Notfallmedizin, Schmerztherapie. 22:1986;94-98
17. Sznajder J.I., Zveibil F.R., Bitterman H., Weiner P., Bursztein S. Central vein catheterisation, failure and complication rates by three percutaneous approaches. Arch. Intern. Med. 146:1986;259-261