Effects of spatial attention on the brain stem frequency-following potential

NeuroReport

Volumn 15, Issue 10, 2004, Pages 1539-1542

  Hoormann, Jörg ^a   Falkenstein, Michael ^a   Hohnsbein, Joachim ^a  

^a LEIBNIZ RESEARCH CENTRE FOR WORKING ENVIRONMENT AND HUMAN FACTORS   (Germany)

Author keywords

Attention; Exogenous orienting; FFP; Frequency following potential; Spatial hearing

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; ATTENTION; AUDITORY DISCRIMINATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; EVOKED BRAIN STEM RESPONSE; FEMALE; HEARING ACUITY; HUMAN; MALE; NEUROMODULATION; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SPATIAL DISCRIMINATION; SPATIAL FREQUENCY DISCRIMINATION; SPATIAL ORIENTATION;

ACOUSTIC STIMULATION; ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ATTENTION; AUDITORY PERCEPTION; BRAIN STEM; EVOKED POTENTIALS, AUDITORY, BRAIN STEM; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; REACTION TIME; SPACE PERCEPTION;

EID: 3242781644     PISSN: 09594965     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/01.wnr.0000134932.89313.3b     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Cherry C. Some experiments on the recognition of speech with one and two ears. J Acoust Soc Am 1953; 23:915-919.
2. Broadbent DE. Perception and Communication. London: Pergamon Press; 1958.
3. Hoormann J, Falkenstein M and Hohnsbein J. Early attention effects in human auditory-evoked potentials. Psychophysiology 2000; 37:29-42.
4. Marsh JT, Smith JC and Worden FG. Receptor and neural responses in auditory masking of low frequency tones. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1972; 32:63-74.
5. Moushegian G, Rupert AL and Stillman RD. Scalp-recorded early responses in man to frequencies in the speech range. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1973; 35:665-667.
6. Hoormann J, Falkenstein M, Hohnsbein J and Blanke L. The human frequency-following response (FFR): normal variability and relation to the click-evoked brain stem response. Hear Res 1992; 59:179-188.
7. Guinan JJ. Physiology of the olivocochlear efferents. In: Syka J (ed.). Auditory Pathway Structure and Function. New York: Plenum Press; 1988. pp. 253-267.
8. Mountain D. Changes in endolymphatic potential and crossed olivocochlear bundle stimulation alter cochlear mechanics. Science 1980; 210:71-72.
9. Siegel JH and Kim DO. Efferent neural control of cochlear mechanics? Olivo-cochlear bundle stimulation affects cochlear biomechanical nonlinearity. Hear Res 1982; 6:171-182.
10. Maison S, Micheyl C and Collet L. Influence of focused auditory attention on cochlear activity in humans. Psychophysiology 2001; 38:35-40.
11. Spence CJ and Driver J. Covert spatial orienting in audition: exogenous and endogenous mechanisms. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 1994; 20:555-574.
12. Low KA, Larson SL, Burke J and Hackley SA. Alerting effects on choice reaction time and the photic eyeblink reflex. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1996; 98:385-393.
13. Hoormann J, Falkenstein M and Hohnsbein J. Effect of selective attention on the latency of human frequency-following potentials. Neuroreport 1994; 5:1609-1612.
14. Hoormann J, Voss B, Falkenstein M and Hohnsbein J. A method to improve the latency estimation of the frequency-following potential (FFP). Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1997; 103:326-329.
15. Dixon WJ. BMDP Statistical Software Manual. Berkeley: University of California Press; 1992.
16. Hillyard SA and Picton TW. Event-related brain potentials and selective information processing in man. In: Desmedt JE (ed.). Cognitive Components in Cerebral Event-related Potentials and Selective Attention. Progress in Clinical Neurophysiohgy, vol. 6. Basel: Karger; 1979, pp. 1-52.
17. Hirschhorn TN and Michie PT. Brain stem auditory evoked potentials (BAEPs) and selective attention revisited. Psychophysiology 1990; 27:495-512.
18. Galbraith GC and Arroyo C. Selective attention and brain stem frequency-following response. Biol Psychol 1993; 37:3-22.
19. Galbraith GC, Olfman DM and Huffman TD. Selective attention affects human brain stem frequency-following response. Neuroreport 2003; 14:735-738.