Skeletal volume enhancement: Implants and osteotomies

Current Opinion in Otolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery

Volumn 12, Issue 4, 2004, Pages 349-356

  Zim, Shane ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Distraction osteogenesis; Facial skeletal augmentation; Implants; Osteotomies; Skeletal volume enhancement

Indexed keywords

BIOMATERIAL; HYDROXYAPATITE; POLITEF; POLYETHYLENE; POLYMER; SILICONE;

COMPUTER MODEL; DISTRACTION OSTEOGENESIS; ESTHETIC SURGERY; FACE; FACE SURGERY; HUMAN; IMPLANT; MANDIBLE; OSTEOTOMY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; SKELETON; SKULL; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; TISSUE ENGINEERING;

ABSORBABLE IMPLANTS; BIOCOMPATIBLE MATERIALS; BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING; COMPUTER SIMULATION; FACIAL BONES; HUMANS; OSTEOGENESIS, DISTRACTION; OSTEOTOMY; SURGERY, PLASTIC;

EID: 3242777753     PISSN: 10689508     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/01.moo.0000130576.04818.55     Document Type: Review

References (50)

1. Scales JT, Winter GD: Clinical considerations in the choice of materials for orthopedic internal prosthesis. J Biomed Mater Res 1975, 9:167-176.
2. Friedman CD, Constantino PD: Alloplastic materials for facial skeletal augmentation. Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am 2002, 10:325-333.
3. Matarasso A, Elias AC, Elias RL: Labial incompetence: a marker for progressive bone resorption in silastic chin augmentation. Plast Reconstr Surg 1997, 98:1007-1014.
4. Panossian A, Garner WL: Polytetrafluoroethylene facial implants: 15 years later. Plast Reconstr Surg 2004, 113:347-349. Provides a concise review and update of polytetrafluoroethylene.
5. Hanke CW: A new ePTFE soft tissue implant for natural-looking augmentation of lips and wrinkles. Dermatol Surg 2002, 28:901-908.
6. Batniji RK, Hutchison JL, Dahiya R, et al.: Tissue response to expanded polytetrafluoroethylene and silicone implants in a rabbit model. Arch Facial Plast Surg 2002, 4:111-113.
7. Truswell WH: Dual-porosity expanded polytetrafluoroethylene soft tissue implant: a new implant for facial soft tissue augmentation. Arch Facial Plast Surg 2002, 4:92-97.
8. Yaremchuk MJ: Facial skeletal reconstruction using porous polyethylene implants. Plast Reconstr Surg 2003, 111:1818-1827. An excellent review of porous polyethylene implants with data to support its safety and efficacy.
9. Constantino PD, Friedman CD: Synthetic bone graft substitutes. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 1994, 27:1037-1074.
10. Moreira-Gonzalez A, Jackson IT, Miyawaki T, et al.: Augmentation of the craniomaxillofacial region using porous hydroxyapatite granules. Plast Reconstr Surg 2003, 111:1808-1817. A review of craniomaxillofacial augmentation with porous HA granules, with data from a 20-year period to demonstrate its efficacy and safety.
11. Constantino PD, Friedman CD, Jones K, et al.: Hydroxyapatite cement: I. Basic chemistry and histologic properties. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1991, 117:379-384.
12. Moreira-Gonzalez A, Jackson IT, Miyawaki T, et al.: Clinical outcome in cranioplasty: critical review in long-term follow-up. J Craniofac Surg 2003, 14:144-153.
13. Rotas N, Sykes JM: Esthetic orthognathic surgery. Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am 2002, 10:233-248.
14. Sykes JM: Orthognathic surgery. In: Facial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, edn 2. Edited by Papel ID, Frodel J, Holt RG, et al. New York: Thieme; 2002:844-864.
15. Terino EO: Chin and malar augmentation. In: Complications and Problems in Aesthetic Plastic Surgery. Edited by Peck GC. New York: Gower Medical Publishing; 1992:6.1-6.31.
16. Bettens RMA, Mommaerts MY, Sykes JM: Aesthetic malar recontouring: the zygomatic sandwich osteotomy. Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am 2002, 10:265-277. Describes a perhaps underutilized alternative to alloplastic implants for malar augmentation.
17. Molina F, Ortiz-Monasterio F: Mandibular elongation and remodeling by distraction: a farewell to major osteotomies. Plast Reconstr Surg 1995, 96:825-840.
18. Imola MJ, Tatum SA: Craniofacial distraction osteogenesis, Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am 2002, 10:287-301.
19. McCarthy JG, Schreibner J, Karp N, et al.: Lengthening the human mandible by gradual distraction. Plast Reconstr Surg 1992, 89:1-10.
20. Izadi K, Yellon R, Mandell DL, et al.: Correction of upper airway obstruction in the newborn with internal mandibular distraction osteogenesis. J Craniofac Surg 2003, 14:493-499. Describes the author's technique and experience using internal mandibular distraction osteogenesis to correct severe micrognathia in 15 neonates.
21. Rhee ST, Buchman SR: Pediatric mandibular distraction osteogenesis: the present and the future. J Craniofac Surg 2003, 14:803-808.
22. Wang X, Wang XX, Cheng L, et al.: Distraction osteogenesis in correction of micrognathia accompanying obstructive sleep apnea syndrome. Plast Reconstr Surg 2003, 112:1549-1557. Describes the author's experience in treating obstructive sleep apnea in an older group of patients with micrognathia resulting from congenital abnormality, trauma, infection, and tumor resection, as well as micrognathia accompanied by temporomandibular joint ankylosis.
23. Woodson BT, Hanson PR, Melugin MB, et al.: Sequential upper airway changes during mandibular distraction for obstructive sleep apnea. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2003, 128:142-144.
24. Van Strijen PJ, Breuning KH, Becking AG, et al.: Cost, operation, and hospitalization times in distraction osteogenesis versus sagittal split osteotomy. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 2003, 31:42-45. A unique study comparing cost, hospitalization, and operating times with mandibular distraction osteogenesis versus bilateral sagittal split osteotomies.
25. Polley JW, Figueroa AA: Distraction osteogenesis: its implications in severe mandibular deformities in hemifacial microsomia. J Craniofac Surg 1997, 8:422-430.
26. Wiens JL, Forte RA, Wiens JP: The use of distraction osteogenesis to treat hemifacial microsomia: a clinical report. J Prosthet Dent 2003, 89:11-14.
27. Takashima M, Kitai N, Mori Y, et al.: Mandibular distraction osteogenesis using an intraoral device and bite plate for a case of hemifacial microsomia. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 2003, 40:437-445.
28. Molina F: Combined maxillary and mandibular distraction osteogenesis. Semin Orthod 1999, 5:41-45.
29. Cho BC. Distraction osteogenesis of free osseocutaneous flap for treatment of severe facial asymmetry. Plast Reconstr Surg 2003111:1241-1248. The authors describe two cases in which a microvascular osseocutaneous free flap used to reconstruct severe hemifacial hypoplasia was distracted simultaneously with the maxilla.
30. van Strijen PJ, Breuning KH, Becking AG, et al.: Complications in bilateral mandibular distraction osteogenesis using internal devices. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2003, 96:392-397.
31. McCarthy JG, Hopper RA, Hollier LH et al. Molding of the regenerate in mandibular distraction: clinical experience. Plast Reconstr Surg 2003;1239-1246. Describes techniques wherein the bony regenerate can be successfully molded during the active and consolidation phases of mandibular distraction osteogenesis to achieve optimal occlusion.
32. Mofid MM, Inoue N, Tufaro AP, et al.: Spring-mediated mandibular distraction osteogenesis. J Craniofac Surg 2003, 14:756-762.
33. Hollier L, Kelly P, Babigumira E, et al.: Minimally invasive Le Fort III distraction. J Craniofac Surg 2002, 13:44-48.
34. Mavili EM, Tuncbilek G, Vargel I: Rigid external distraction of the midface with direct wiring of the distraction unit in patients with craniofacial dysplasia. J Craniofac Surg 2003, 14:783-785.
35. Denny AD, Kalantarian B, Hanson PR: Rotation advancement of the midface by distraction osteogenesis. Plast Reconstr Surg 2003, 111:1789-1799. A unique application of an internal distraction device for rotation and advancement of the midface after LeFort III osteotomy.
36. Matsumoto K, Nakanishi H, Kubo Y, et al.: Advances in distraction techniques for craniofacial surgery. J Med Invest 2003, 50:117-125. A concise review describing clinical applications of cranofacial distraction osteogenesis.
37. Margulis A, Patel PK, Daw JL, et al.: Distraction osteogenesis of the mandible with an internal bioresorbable device. J Craniofac Surg 2003, 14:791-796. The authors present their experience with a resorbable mandibular distraction device in seven pediatric patients. They provide a succinct discussion of the advantages and disadvantages of different categories of distraction devices.
38. McCarthy JG, Hopper RA: Distraction osteogenesis ofzygomatic bone grafts in a patient with Treacher Collins syndrome: a case report. J Craniofac Surg 2002, 13:279-283.
39. Shin JH, Duncan CC, Persing J: Monoblock distraction: technical modification and considerations. J Craniofac Surg 2003, 14:763-766. A case presentation applying internal distraction devices for monoblock advancement.
40. Hirabayashi S, Sugawara Y, Sakurai A, et al.: Frontoorbital advancement by gradual distraction. J Neurosurg 1998, 89:1058-1061.
41. Kobyashi S, Honda T, Saitoh A, et al.: Unilateral coronal synostosis treated by internal forehead distraction. J Craniofac Surg 1999, 10:467-471.
42. Cheung LK, Wong MCM, Wong LLS: Refinement of facial reconstructive surgery by stereo-model planning. Ann Roy Australas Coll Dent Surg 2002, 16:129-132.
43. Schmelzeisen R, Schon R, Schramm A, et al.: Computer-aided procedures in implantology, distraction and cranio-maxillofacial surgery. Ann Roy Australas Coll Dent Surg 2002, 16:46-49.
44. Chea C, Chua C, Tan K, et al.: Integration of laser surface digitizing with CAD/CAM techniques for developing facial prostheses: Part 1. Design and fabrication of prosthesis replicas. Int J Prosthodont 2003, 16:435-441. Describes a novel use of technology to create accurate facial prostheses.
45. Warren SM, Fong KD, Chen CM, et al.: Tools and techniques for craniofacial tissue engineering. Tissue Eng 2003, 9:187-200. Provides a comprehensive review of state-of-the-art experiments with gene-based and cell-based tissue engineering strategies.
46. Zamboni WA: What's new in plastic and maxillofacial surgery. J Am Coll Surg 2003, 196:453-462. Provides a comprehensive update on recent advances in basic science research related to plastic and maxillofacial surgery.
47. th Annual Meeting, Boston, MA 2002:159.
48. th Annual Meeting, Boston, MA 2002:154.
49. th Annual Meeting, Boston, MA 2002:152.
50. th Annual Meeting, Boston, MA 2002:171.