Cost-effective analysis of candidate genes using htSNPs: A staged approach

Genes and Immunity

Volumn 5, Issue 4, 2004, Pages 301-305

  Lowe, C E ^a   Cooper, J D ^a   Chapman, J M ^a   Barratt, B J ^a   Twells, R C J ^a   Green, E A ^a   Savage, D A ^b   Guja, C ^c   Ionescu Tirgoviste C ^c   Tuomilehto Wolf, E ^d   Tuomilehto, J ^d   Todd, J A ^a   Clayton, David G ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE   (United Kingdom)

^b QUEEN'S UNIVERSITY BELFAST   (United Kingdom)

^c Clin of Nutr and Metabolic Disease   (ROM)

^d UNIVERSITY OF HELSINKI   (Finland)

Author keywords

Association studies; htSPNs; Multi locus TDT; Power; Two stage design

Indexed keywords

CYTOKINE; IMMUNOGLOBULIN ENHANCER BINDING PROTEIN; PROTEIN RANK; PROTEIN TRANCE; REGULATOR PROTEIN; TUMOR NECROSIS FACTOR; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ARTICLE; COST CONTROL; COST EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS; DISEASE ASSOCIATION; DISEASE TRANSMISSION; GENE FREQUENCY; GENE LINKAGE DISEQUILIBRIUM; GENE LOCUS; GENETIC ASSOCIATION; GENOTYPE; HAPLOTYPE; HUMAN; IMMUNOPATHOGENESIS; IMMUNOREGULATION; INSULIN DEPENDENT DIABETES MELLITUS; POPULATION GENETICS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REGULATOR GENE; SINGLE NUCLEOTIDE POLYMORPHISM; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS;

EID: 3242768295     PISSN: 14664879     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/sj.gene.6364064     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Service SK, Sandkuijl LA, Freimer NB. Cost-effective designs for linkage disequilibrium mapping of complex traits. Am J Hum Genet 2003; 72: 1213-1220.
2. Ioannidis JPA, Trikalinos TA, Ntzani EE, Contopoulos-Ioannidis DG. Genetic associations in large versus small studies: an empirical assessment. Lancet 2003; 361: 567-571.
3. Johnson GC, Esposito L, Barratt BJ et al. Haplotype tagging for the identification of common disease genes. Nat Genet 2001; 29: 233-237.
4. Chapman JM, Cooper JD, Todd JA, Clayton DG. Detecting disease associations due to linkage disequilibrium using haplotype tags: a class of tests and the determinants of statistical power. Hum Heredity 2003; 56: 18-31.
5. Aplenc R, Zhao H, Rebbeck TR, Propert KJ. Group sequential methods and sample size savings in biomarker-disease association studies. Genetics 2003; 163: 1215-1219.
6. Satagopan JM, Elston RC. Optimal two-stage genotyping in population-based association studies. Genet Epidemiol 2003; 25: 149-157.
7. Zhang K, Deng M, Chen T, Waterman MS, Sun F. A dynamic programming algorithm for haplotype block partitioning. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2002; 99: 7335-7339.
8. Ke X, Cardon LR. Efficient selective screening of haplotype tag SNPs. Bioinformatics 2003; 19: 287-288.
9. Stram DO, Haiman CA, Hirschhorn JN et al. Choosing haplotype-tagging SNPs based on unphased genotype data using a preliminary sample of unrelated subjects with an example from the multiethnic cohort study. Hum Heredity 2003; 55: 27-36.
10. Fan R, Knapp M. Genome association studies of complex diseases by case-control designs. Am J Hum Genet 2003; 72: 850-868.
11. Green EA, Choi Y, Flavell RA. Pancreatic lymph node-derived CD4(+)CD25(+) Treg cells: highly potent regulators of diabetes that require TRANCE-RANK signals. Immunity 2002; 16: 183-191.
12. Merriman TR, Twells RC, Merriman ME et al. Evidence by allelic association-dependent methods for a type 1 diabetes polygene (IDDM6) on chromosome 18q21. Hum Mol Genet 1997; 6: 1003-1010.
13. Vaidya B, Imrie H, Perros P et al. Evidence for a new Graves' disease susceptibility locus at chromosome 18q21. Am J Hum Genet 2000; 66: 1710-1714.
14. Merriman TR, Cordell HJ, Eaves IA et al. Suggestive evidence for association of human chromosome 18q12-q21 and its orthologue on rat and mouse chromosome 18 with several autoimmune diseases. Diabetes 2001; 50: 184-194.
15. Jawaheer D, Seldin MF, Amos CI et al. Screening the genome for rheumatoid arthritis susceptibility genes. Arthritis Rheum 2003; 48: 906-916.
16. Chapman JM, Clayton DG. Detecting disease associations due to linkage disequilibrium using haplotype tags: technical addendum. http://www-gene.cimr.cam.ac.uk/clayton/tech_reports/ Chapman-clayton-2003.pdf
17. Boos DB. On generalized score tests. Am Statistician 1992; 46: 327-333.
18. StataCorp. Stata Statistical Software: Realease 8.0. Stata Corporation: College Station, TX, 2003.
19. R statistical language http://www.r-project.org/.