Minding science: Constructivism and the discourse of inquiry

Cognitive Therapy and Research

Volumn 27, Issue 1, 2003, Pages 105-123

  Mahoney, Michael J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NORTH TEXAS   (United States)

Author keywords

Academic politics; Graduate school; Psychology of science

Indexed keywords

BEHAVIORISM; COGNITION; COGNITIVE THERAPY; EMOTION; POLITICS; PSYCHOLOGY; PUBLICATION; REVIEW; SCIENCE; SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE;

EID: 3242762133     PISSN: 01475916     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1023/A:1022594831661     Document Type: Review

References (58)

1. Anderson, W. T. (1990). Reality isn't what it used to be. San Francisco: Harper & Row.
2. Anderson, W. T. (Ed.). (1995). The truth about the truth: De-confusing and re-constructing the postmodern world. New York: Putnam.
3. Bartley, W. W. (1984). The retreat to commitment. La Salle, IL: Open Court.
4. Barzun, J. (1964). Science: The glorious entertainment. New York: Harper & Row.
5. Bazerman, C. (1988). Shaping written knowledge: The genre and activity of the experimental paper in science. Madison. WI: University of Wisconsin Press.
6. Bloor, D. (1976). Knowledge and social imagery. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
7. Bohm, D. (1996). On dialogue. London: Routledge.
8. Broad, W., & Wade, N. (1982). Betrayers of the truth: Fraud and deceit in the halls of science. New York: Simon and Schuster.
9. Brown, J. R. (2001). Who rules science? An opinionated guide to the wars. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
10. Catania, A. C. (1991). The gifts of culture and of eloquence: An open letter to Michael J. Mahoney in reply to his paper, "Scientific psychology and radical behaviorism." The Behavior Analyst, 14, 61-72.
11. Chubin, D. E., & Hackett, E. J. (1990). Peerless science: Peer review and U.S. science policy. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.
12. Fortun, M., & Bernstein, H. J. (1998). Muddling through: Pursuing science and truths in the 21st century. Washington, DC: Counterpoint.
13. Freedman, D. H. (1998). When is a planet not a planet? Arguments for and against demoting Pluto. The Atlantic Monthly, 281(2), 22-33.
14. Fuller, S. (2000). Science studies through the looking glass: An intellectual itinerary. In U. Segerstråle (Ed.), Beyond the science wars: The missing discourse about science and society (pp. 185-217). Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
15. Geertz, C. (2000). Available light: Anthropological reflections on philosophical topics. Princenton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
16. Gholson, B., Shadish, W. R., Neimeyer, R. A., & Houts, A. C. (Eds.). (1989). Psychology of science. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
17. Goldberger, N., Tarule, J., Clinchy, B., & Belenky, M. (Eds.). (1996). Knowledge, difference, and power: Essays inspired by Women's Ways of Knowing. New York: Basic Books.
18. Greenberg, D. S. (1999). The politics of pure science (2nd ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
19. Gross, P., & Levitt, N. (1994). Higher superstition: The academic left and its quarrels with science. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins Press.
20. Grover, S. C. (1981). Toward a psychology of the scientist: Implications of psychological research for contemporary philosophy of science. Washington, DC: University Press of America.
21. Gould, S. J. (2000). Deconstructing the "science wars" by reconstructing an old mold. Science, 287, 253-261.
22. Hacking, I. (1975). The emergence of probability. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
23. Holton, G. (1995). Einstein, history, and other passions. Woodbury, NY: American Institute of Physics.
24. Johnson, W. B. (2002). The intentional mentor: Strategies and guidelines for the practice of mentoring. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 33, 88-96.
25. Keller, E. F. (1983). A feeling for the organism: The life and work of Barbara McClintock. New York: Freeman.
26. Keller, E. F. (1985). Reflections on gender and science. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
27. Knorr Cetina, K. (1999). Epistemic cultures: How the sciences make knowledge. Cambridge. MA: Harvard University Press.
28. Kuhn, T. S. (1977). The essential tension. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
29. Kuhn, T. S. (2000). The road since structure. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
30. Kukla, A. (1998). Studies in scientific realism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
31. Lillienfeld, S. O. (2002). When worlds collide: Social science, politics, and the Rind et al. (1998) child sexual abuse meta-analysis. American Psychologist, 57, 176-188.
32. Magee, B. (1997). Confessions of a philosopher. New York: Random House.
33. Mahoney, M. J. (1974). Cognition and behavior modification. Cambridge. MA: Ballinger.
34. Mahoney, M. J. (1980). Psychotherapy and the structure of personal revolutions. In M. J. Mahoney (Ed.). Psychotherapy process: Current issues and future directions (pp. 157-180). New York: Plenum.
35. Mahoney, M. J. (1985). Open exchange and epistemic progress. American Psychologist, 40, 29-39.
36. Mahoney, M. J. (1989). Scientific psychology and radical behaviorism: Important distinctions based in scientism and objectivism. American Psychologist, 44, 1372-1377.
37. Mahoney, M. J. (1991). Human change processes. New York: Basic Books.
38. Mahoney, M. J. (1996). Narrative truths about behaviorism. History of Psychology Newsletter, 28, 3-12.
39. Mahoney, M. J. (2003a). Constructive psychotherapy: Structuring processes in personal revolutions. New York: Guilford.
40. Mahoney, M. J. (2003b). Scientist as subject: The psychological imperative. Clinton Corners, NY: Eliot Werner Publications. (Original work published 1976)
41. Mahoney, M. J. & Mahoney, S. M. (2001). Living within essential tensions: Dialectics and future development. In K. J. Schneider, J. F. T. Bugental, & J. F. Pierson (Eds.). The handbook of humanistic psychology (pp. 659-665). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
42. Montgomery, S. L. (1996). The scientific voice. New York: Guilford.
43. Nussbaum, M. C. (1997). Cultivating humanity: A classical defense of reform in liberal education. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
44. Olmert, M. (1992). The Smithsonian book of books. New York: Wings Books.
45. Oyama, S. (2000). Evolution's eye: A systems view of the biology-culture divide. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
46. Pera, M. (1994). The discourses of science. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
47. Pyenson, L., & Sheets-Pyenson, S. (1999). Servants of Nature: A history of scientific institutions, enterprises, and sensibilities. New York: Norton.
48. Ross, A. (Ed.). (1996). Science wars. Durham. NC: Duke University Press.
49. Rorty, R. (1999). Philosophy and social hope. New York: Penguin.
50. Shattuck, R. (1996). Forbidden knowledge: From Prometheus to pornography. New York: St. Martin's Press.
51. Segerstråle, U. (Ed.). (2000). Beyond the science wars: The missing discourse about science and society. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
52. Skinner, B. F. (1983). A matter of consequences: Part three of an autobiography. New York: New York University Press.
53. Skinner, B. F. (1987). Whatever happened to psychology as the science of behavior? American Psychologist, 42, 780-786.
54. Smith, B. H. (1988). Contingencies of value: Alternative perspectives for critical theory. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
55. Smith, R. (1997). The Norton history of the human sciences. New York: W. W. Norton.
56. Sokal, A., & Bricmont, J. (1998). Fashionable nonsense: Postmodern intellectuals' abuse of science. New York: Picador.
57. Weimer, W. B. (1979). Notes on the methodology of scientific research. Hillsdale. NJ: Erlbaum.
58. Wilber, K. (1998). The marriage of sense and soul. New York: Random House.