Adversarial safety analysis: Borrowing the methods of security vulnerability assessments

Journal of Safety Research

Volumn 35, Issue 3, 2004, Pages 245-248

  Johnston, Roger G ^a  

^a LOS ALAMOS NATIONAL LABORATORY   (United States)

Author keywords

Psychology of safety; Risk assessment; Safety evaluations; Security; Vulnerability assessment

Indexed keywords

AUDITION; ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL EFFECTS; OPTIMIZATION; PERSONNEL; PROBLEM SOLVING; RISK ASSESSMENT; SECURITY SYSTEMS;

PSYCHOLOGY OF SAFETY; SAFETY EVALUATIONS; SECURITY; VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT;

ACCIDENT PREVENTION;

EDITORIAL; HUMAN; MASS COMMUNICATION; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; SAFETY; UNITED STATES;

DIFFUSION OF INNOVATION; HUMANS; SAFETY MANAGEMENT; SECURITY MEASURES; UNITED STATES;

EID: 3242756766     PISSN: 00224375     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jsr.2004.03.013     Document Type: Editorial

References (6)

1. Broder J. Risk Analysis and the Security Survey. 1999;Butterworth- Heinemann, Boston, MA.
2. Garcia M.L. The Design and Evaluation of Physical Protection Systems. 2001;Butterworth-Heinemann, Boston, MA.
3. Johnston R.G., Bremer Maerli M. The negative consequences of ambiguous 'safeguards' terminology. Proceedings of the Institute for Nuclear Materials Management (INMM) 4th Annual Meeting July 13-17, Phoenix, AZ. 2003.
4. Johnston R.G., Garcia A.R.E. Effective vulnerability assessments for physical security devices, systems, and programs. Österreich Militärische ZeitSchrift (Austrian Military Journal), Special Edition on Nuclear Material Protection, February 2003. 2003;51-55.
5. LANL Vulnerability Assessment Team. (2003). VAT Home Page: http://pearl1.lanl.gov/seals/default.htm.
6. Roper C. Risk Assessment for Security Professionals. 1999;Butterworth- Heinemann, Boston, MA