Evidence for social learning in the self-presentation of alcohol problems

Alcohol and Alcoholism

Volumn 39, Issue 4, 2004, Pages 346-350

  Davies, J B ^a   McConnochie, F ^b   Ross, A ^a   Heim, D ^a   Wallace, B ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF STRATHCLYDE   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ABERTAY DUNDEE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALCOHOLISM; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; COGNITION; CONTROLLED STUDY; DRINKING BEHAVIOR; EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MEMORY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUESTIONNAIRE; RATING SCALE; SELF CONCEPT; SELF REPORT; SOCIAL ASPECT; SOCIAL LEARNING; SYMPTOMATOLOGY;

ADULT; AGED; ALCOHOLISM; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; CHI-SQUARE DISTRIBUTION; EGO; HUMANS; LEARNING; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; QUESTIONNAIRES; SOCIAL BEHAVIOR;

EID: 3242756738     PISSN: 07350414     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/alcalc/agh066     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Anderson, I., Aitken P. P. and Davies J. B. (1981) Recall of the ordering of the symptoms of alcoholism. British Journal of Clinical Psychology 20, 137-138.
2. Baxter, J. and Boon, J. (2000) Interrogative suggestibility: the importance of being earnest. Personality and Individual Differences 28, 753-762.
3. Baddeley, A. D. and Hitch, G. J. (1974) Working memory. In The Psychology of Learning and Motivation Vol. 8, pp. 47-89 Bower, G. H., ed. Academic Press, New York.
4. Baddeley, A. D. (1976) The Psychology of Memory. Harper and Row, New York.
5. Chick, J. and Duffy, J. (1979) Application to the alcohol dependence syndrome of a method for determining the sequential development of symptoms. Psychological Medicine 9, 313-319.
6. Cronbach, L. J. (1951) Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika 16, 297-334.
7. Cronbach, L. J. and Meehl, P. E. (1967) Construct validity in psychological tests. In Problems in Human Assessment, Chapter 4, pp. 57-77 Jackson, D. N. and Messick, S., eds. McGraw-Hill, New York.
8. Davies, J. B. (1997) Drugspeak: The Analysis of Drug Discourse. Harwood Academic Publishers, Reading, UK.
9. Davies, J. B. and Baker, R. (1987) The impact of self-presentation and interviewer-bias effects on self-reported heroin use. British Journal of Addiction 82, 907-912.
10. Davies, J. B. (1998) Pharmacology versus social process: competing or complementary views on the nature of addiction. Pharmacology and Therapeutics 80, 265-275.
11. Davies, J. B. and Best, D. W. (1996) Demand characteristics and research into drug use. Psychology and Health 11, 291-299.
12. Heim, D., Davies, J. B., Cheyne, B. and Smallwood, J. (2001) Addiction as a Functional Representation. Journal of Community and Applied Social Psychology 11, 57-62.
13. Lilienfeld, S. O., Lynn, S. J. and Lohr, J. M. (2003) Science and Pseudoscience in Clinical Psychology. Guilford Press, New York, NY.
14. McAllister, P. and Davies, J. B. (1992) Attributional bias as a function of clinical classification. Drug Issues 22, 5.
15. McConnochie, F. B. (1997) Attitudes and perceptions towards alcohol and addiction: a socio-cognitive approach. PhD thesis, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow, UK.
16. McKennel, A. (1970) Attitude measurement: use of coefficient alpha with cluster or factor analysis. Sociology 4, 227-245.
17. O'Connor, S. M., Davies, J. B., Heffernan, D. and Van Eijk, R. (2003) An alternative method for predicting attrition from an alcohol treatment programme. Alcohol and Alcoholism 38, 568-573.
18. Shannon, C. E. and Weaver, W. (1949) The Mathematical Theory of Communication. University of Illinois, Illinois, IL, USA.
19. Yarmey, A. D. (2003) Eyewitnesses. In Handbook of Psychology in Legal Contexts, Carson, D. and Bull, R., eds, pp. 533-558. Wiley and Sons, Chichester, UK.