Interaction for computer-aided learning

Interactive Multimedia Electronic Journal of Computer - Enhanced Learning

Volumn 2, Issue , 2000, Pages

  Schär, Sissel Guttormsen ^a   Schluep, S ^a   Schierz, C ^a   Krueger, H ^a  

^a SWISS FEDERAL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COGNITIVE SYSTEMS; COMPUTER PROGRAMMING; DATA PROCESSING; FEEDBACK; HEURISTIC METHODS; HUMAN COMPUTER INTERACTION; KNOWLEDGE ACQUISITION; SOFTWARE ENGINEERING; TEXT PROCESSING; USER INTERFACES;

COMPUTER-AIDED LEARNING (CAL); COMPUTING POWER; LEARNING MODES; LEARNING PROCESSES;

LEARNING SYSTEMS;

EID: 3242754294     PISSN: 15259102     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Berry, D.C., & Broadbent, D.E. (1988). Interactive tasks and the implicit-explicit distinction. British Journal of Psychology, 79, 251-272.
2. Broadbent, D.E., FitzGerald, P., & Broadbent, M.H.P. (1986). Implicit and explicit knowledge in the control of complex systems. British Journal of Psychology, 77, 33-50.
3. Canter, D., Rivers, R., & Storrs, G. (1985). Characterising user navigation through complex data structures. Behaviour & Information Technology, 4, 93-102.
4. Duffy, T.M., & Jonassen, D.H. (1992). Constructivism and the technology of instruction: A conversation. Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum.
5. Engström, Y. (1990). When is a tool? Multiple meanings of artifacts in human activity, learning, working, imagining (pp. 171-195). Helsinki: Orienta-Konsultit Oy.
6. Fjeld, M., Bichsel, M., & Rauterberg, M. (1998). BUILD-IT: An intuitive design tool based on direct object manipulation. In I. Wachsmut & M. Frölich (Eds.), Gesture and Sign Language in Human-Computer Interaction, Vol. 1371 (pp. 297-308). Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
7. Gibson, J.J. (1986). The ecological approach to visual perception. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
8. Guttormsen Schär, S.G. (1996). The influence of the user-interfaceon solving well- and ill-defined problems. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 44, 1-18.
9. Guttormsen Schär, S.G. (1997b). The history as a cognitive tool for navigation in a hypertext system. M.J. Smith, G. Salvendy, & R.J. Koubek (Eds.), Vol. 21B (pp. 743-746): Elsevier.
10. Guttormsen Schär, S.G. (1998). Implicit and explicit learning of computerised tasks. The role of the user-interface and task saliency. Doctoral thesis, University of Zürich.
11. Guttormsen Schär, S.G. (1999a). The effect of continuous vs. discontinuous feedback in a simulation based learning environment. P.o.E.-M. 1999 (Ed.), Ed-Media 1999, Vol. 11 (pp. 190-194), Seattle, USA: B. Collins R. Oliver.
12. Guttormsen Schär, S.G., Schierz, C., Stoll, F., & Krueger, H. (1997a). The effect of the interface on learning style in a simulation based learning situation. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 9, 235-253.
13. Hayes, N.A., & Broadbent, D.E. (1988). Two modes of learning for interactive tasks. Cognition, 28, 249-276.
14. Kunkel, K., Bannert, M., & Fach, P.W. (1995). The influence of design decisions on the usability of direct manipulation user interfaces. Behaviour & Information Technlogy, 14(2), 93-106.
15. Maddix, F. (1990). Human-computer interaction. Theory and practice. New York: Ellis Horwood.
16. McAleese, R. (1989). Navigation and browsing in hypertext. In R. McAleese (Ed.), Hypertext theory into practice (pp. 7-43). Oxford: BSP Intellect books.
17. Reber, A.R., & Lewis, S. (1977). Implicit learning: An analysis of the form and structure of a body of tacit knowledge. Cognition, 5, 333-361.
18. Reber, A.S. (1976). Implicit learning of Synthetic Languages: The role of instructional set. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 2(1), 88-94.
19. Reber, A.S. (1989). Implicit learning and tacit knowledge. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 118, 219-235.
20. Reber, A.S., & Allen, R. (1978). Analogic and abstract strategies in synthetic grammar learning: A functionalist interpretation. Cognition, 6, 189-221.
21. Reber, A.S., Kassin, S.M., Lewis, S., & Cantor, G. (1980). On the relationship between implicit and explicit modes in the learning of a complex rule structure. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 6, 492-502.
22. Sengupta, K., & Te'eni, D. (1991). Direct manipulation and command language interfaces: a comparison of user's mental models. In H.J. Bullinger (Ed.), Human Aspects in Computing: Design and Use for Interactive Systems and Information management. (Advances in Human Factors/Ergonomics, 18A, pp. 429-434). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
23. Shneiderman, B. (1987). Designing the User Interface: Strategies for Effective Human-Computer Interactions. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley Publishing Co.
24. Torres-Chazaro, O., Beaton, R., & Deisenroth, M. (1992). Comparison of command language and direct manipulation interfaces for CNC milling machines. International Journal of Computer Integrated Manufacturing, 5(2), 107-117.
25. Trudel, C.-I., & Payne, S.J. (1995). Reflection and goal management in exploratory learning. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 42, 307-339.