Feminist knowledge and ethical concerns: Towards a geography of situated ethics;Savoir féministe et éthique: recherche située et éthique en géographie

Espace-Populations-Societes

Volumn , Issue 1, 2004, Pages 131-141

  White, Catherine ^a   Bailey, Cathy ^b  

^a NORTHUMBRIA UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^b DURHAM UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Epistemology; Ethics; Feminist research; Fieldwork experiences; Situated research

Indexed keywords

ACADEMIC RESEARCH; ETHICS; FEMINISM; FIELDWORK; KNOWLEDGE;

EID: 3242754162     PISSN: 07557809     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4000/eps.568     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. ACKERT J.K., ESSEVELD J. (1983), Objectivity and truth: problems in doing feminist research, Women's Studies International Forum 6, pp. 423-425.
2. BARNES T., (1996), Logics of dislocation: models, metaphors and meaning of economic space, New York, the Guilford Press.
3. o 4, pp. 169-178.
4. BENNY M., HUGHES M. (1970), "Of Sociology and the Interview", in N. Denzin (ed), Sociological Methods: a Source Book, London, Butterworth.
5. BURGESS R. (1984), In the Field. an Introduction to Field Research, Routledge.
6. BURGOYNE J., CLARK D. (1984), Making a Go of It: The Study of Stepfamilies, London, Routledge and Kegan Paul.
7. BUTLER J. (1990), Gender Trouble, London, Routledge.
8. o 24.
9. CURRY M. (1991), On the possibility of ethics in geography: Writing, citing and the construction of intellectual property, Progress in Human Geography, vol. 15, pp. 125-147.
10. DENZIN N. (1989), Interpretive Interactionism, London,Sage.
11. DOMOSH M. (1991), Toward a feminist historiography of geography, Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, vol. 16, pp. 95-104.
12. DUNCOMBE J., MARSDEN D (1996), "Can we Research the Private Sphere?, Methodological and Ethical Problems of the Role of Intimate Emotion in Personal Relationships", in L. Morris, E Stina Lyon (eds.), Gender Relations in Public and Private: New research Perspectives, MacMillan Press Ltd.
13. ENGLAND K. (1994), Getting personal: reflexivity, positionality, and feminist research, Professional Geographer, vol. 46, n° 1, pp. 80-89.
14. FOUCAULT M. (1988), The History of Sexuality, vol. 3: The care of the Self, London, Allen Lane.
15. GILBERT M. (1994), The politics of location: Doing feminist fieldwork at "home", Professional Geographer, vol. 46, n° 1, pp. 90-96.
16. GILLIGAN C. (1982), In a Different Voice, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
17. GOODE W., HAT P. (1952), Methods in Social Research, New York, McGraw.
18. GORMLEY N., BONDI N (1999), "Ethical Issues in Practical Contexts", in J. Proctor and D. Smith (eds.) Geography and Ethics: Journeys in a Moral Terrain, Routledge, pp. 251-262.
19. GUBRIUM J., HOLSTEIN J. (1990), What is Family?, London, Mayfield.
20. HARAWAY D. (1988), Situated Knowledges: the Science Question in Feminism and the Privilege of Partial Perspective, Feminist Studies, vol. 14, pp. 575-599.
21. HARDING S. (1987), Feminism and Methodology, Bloomington, Indiana University Press.
22. HARDING S. (1991), Whose Science? Whose Knowledge?, New York, Cornell University Press.
23. HAY I. (1998), Making moral imaginations. Research ethics, pedagogy and professional human geography, Ethics, Place and Environment, vol. 1, pp 55-76.
24. HERMANN T., MATTINGLY D. (1999), "Community, justice and the ethics of research: Negotiating reciprocal research relations", in J. Proctor, D. Smith (eds.), Geography and Ethics: Journeys in a Moral Terrain, Routledge, pp. 209-222.
25. HOLBROOK M.B.(1999), Consumer Value: A framework for analysis and research, London, Routledge.
26. KELLY L. (1992), "Journeying in Reverse: Possibilities and Problems in Feminist Research on Sexual Violence", in A. Morris (ed.), Feminist Perspectives in Criminology, Milton Keynes, Open University Press.
27. KOBAYASHI A. (1994), Coloring the field: gender, 'race' and the politics of fieldwork, Professional Geographer, vol. 46, pp. 73-80.
28. LAROSSA R., BENNETT L., GELLES R. (1981), Ethical Dilemmas in Qualitative Family Research, Journal of Marriage and the Family, vol. 43.
29. LAWSON V. (1995), The politics of difference: Examining the quantitative/qualitative dualism in post-structuralist feminist research, The Professional Geographer, vol. 47, n° 4, pp. 449-458.
30. McDOWELL L (1992), Do you mean 1991 or 1993 here? 1991 The baby and the bath water: diversity, deconstruction and feminist theory in Geography, Geoforum, vol. 22, n° 2, pp. 123-133.
31. McDOWELL L. (1993), Space, place and gender relations Part I Feminist empiricism and the geography of social relations, Progress in Human Geography, vol. 17, n° 2, pp. 157-179.
32. McDOWELL L., SHARP J. (eds.) (1997), Space, Gender, Knowledge: Feminist Readings, Arnold.
33. McLAFERTY S. (1995), Counting for Women, Professional Geographer, vol. 47, pp. 436-442.
34. MITCHELL B., DRAPER D. (1982), Relevance and ethics in geography, Longman, Harlow.
35. OAKLEY A. (1981), "Interviewing women: a contradiction in terms?", in H. Roberts (ed.), Doing Feminist Research, Routledge, London, pp. 30-61.
36. PROCTOR J. (1998), Ethics in Geography: Giving moral form to the geographical imagination, Area, vol. 30, pp. 8-18.
37. PROCTOR J., SMITH D. (1999), Geography and Ethics: Journeys in a Moral Terrain, Routledge.
38. REINHARZ S. (1983), "Experimental research: a contribution to feminist theory", in G. Bowles, R. Klein (eds.), Theories of Women's Studies, London, Routledge, pp. 162-191.
39. ROCHELEAU D. (1995), Maps, Numbers, Text and Context: Mixing Method in Feminist Political Ecology, Professional Geographer, vol. 47, n° 4, pp. 458-466.
40. ROSE G. (1997), Situating knowledges: positionality, reflexivities and other tactics, Progress in Human Geography,vol. 21, pp. 305-320.
41. SANDELOWSKI M., HOLDITCH-DAVIS D., HARRIS B. (1992), "Using qualitative and quantitative methods; the transition to parenthood of infertile couples", in J. Gilgun, K. Daly, G. Handel (eds.), Qualitative methods in family research, Sage, London, pp. 301-22.
42. SAYER A., STORPER M. (1997), Guest editorial essay - Ethics unbound: For a normative turn in social theory, Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, vol. 15, pp. 1-7.
43. SAYER A., STOPER M. (1995) Should women count? The role of quantitative methodology in feminist geographic research, Professional Geographer, vol. 47, n° 4, pp. 426-466.
44. SLATER D. (1997), Spatialities of power and postmodern ethics - rethinking geographical encounters, Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, vol. 15, pp. 55-72.
45. STACEY J. (1988), Can there be a feminist ethnography?, Women's Studies International Forum 11, pp. 21-27.
46. STACEY J. (1990), Brave New Families, New York, Basic Books.
47. STANLEY L., WISE S. (1993), Breaking Out, Routledge, Kegan Paul.
48. VALENTINE G. (1999), Doing household research: interviewing couples together and apart, Area, vol. 31, n° 1, pp. 67-74.
49. WHATMORE S. (1997), Dissecting the autonomous self: hybrid cartographies for a relational ethics, Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, vol. 15, pp. 55-72.
50. WHEELOCK J., OUGHTON E. (1996), The household as a focus for research, Journal of Economic Issues, vol. 2, n° 1, pp. 143-59.
51. WHEELOCK J., OUGHTON E.(1994), Women in the Field: Critical Feminist Methodologies and Theoretical Perspectives, Professional Geographer, vol. 46, n° 1, pp. 54-102.
52. Images of women in psychology" in M. Paludi, G. Steuernaget (eds.), Foundations from a Feminist Restructuring of the Academic Disciplines, Haworth, New York, pp.