Geometric motion segmentation and model selection

Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences

Volumn 356, Issue 1740, 1998, Pages 1321-1340

  Torr, P H S ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

^b MICROSOFT   (United States)

Author keywords

Clustering; Degeneracy detection; Epipolar geometry; Grouping; Matching; Robust estimation

Indexed keywords

EID: 3242741982     PISSN: 1364503X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1098/rsta.1998.0224     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Akaike, H. 1974 A new look at the statistical model identification. IEEE Trans. Automatic Control AC-19, 716-723.
2. Ayer, S. & Sawhney, H. 1995 Layered representation of motion video using robust maximum-likelihood estimation of mixture models and mdl encoding. In Proc. 5th Int. Conf. on Computer Vision, Boston, pp. 777-784. Los Alamitos, CA: IEEE Computer Society Press.
3. Beardsley, P., Torr, P. H. S. & Zisserman, A. 1996 3D model aquisition from extended image sequences. In Proc. 4th European Conf. on Computer Vision, Cambridge (ed. B. Buxton & R. Cipolla), pp. 683-695. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 1065. Springer.
4. Black, A. & Anandan, P. 1996 The robust estimation of multiple motions: parametric and piecewise-smooth flow fields. Computer Vision Image Understanding 63(1), 75-104.
5. Bozdogan, H. 1987 Model selection and Akaike's information criterion (AIC): the general theory and its analytical extensions. Psychometrika 52, 345-370.
6. Darrell, T., Sclaroff, S. & Pentland, A. 1990 Segmentation by minimal description. In Proc. 3rd Int. Conf. on Computer Vision, Osaka, pp. 112-116. IEEE.
7. Dempster, A. P., Laird, N. M. & Rubin, D. B. 1977 Maximum likelihood from incomplete data via the em algorithm. J. R. Statist. Soc. B 39, 1-38.
8. Faugeras, O. D. 1992 What can be seen in three dimensions with an uncalibrated stereo rig? In Proc. 2nd European Conf. on Computer Vision, Santa Margherita Ligure (ed. G. Sandini), pp. 563-578. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 588. Springer.
9. Fisher, R. A. 1936 Uncertain interference. Proc. Am. Acad. Art Sci. 71, 245-258.
10. Fischler, M. & Bolles, R. 1981 Random sample consensus: a paradigm for model fitting with application to image analysis and automated cartography. Commun. Ass. Comp. Mach. 24, 381-395.
11. Gu, H., Yoshiaki, S. & Asada, M. 1996 MDL-based segementation and motion modeling in a long image sequence of scene with multiple independently moving objects. IEEE Trans. Pattern Analysis Machine Intellig. 18, 58-64.
12. Hampel, J. P., Ronchetti, E. M., Rousseeuw, P. J. & Stahel, W. A. 1986 Robust statistics: an approach based on influence functions. New York: Wiley.
13. Harris, C. J. & Stephens, M. 1987 A combined corner and edge detector. In Proc. Alvey Conf., pp. 147-151.
14. Hartley, R. I. 1992 Estimation of relative camera positions for uncalibrated cameras. In Proc. 2nd European Conf. on Computer Vision, Santa Margherita Ligure (ed. G. Sandini), pp. 579-587. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 588. Springer.
15. Huber, P. J. 1981 Robust statistics. New York: Wiley.
16. Jepson, A. & Black, M. 1993 Mixture models for optical flow computation. In CVPR-93, pp. 760-766. IEEE.
17. Kanatani, K. 1996 Statistical optimization for geometric computation: theory and practice. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science.
18. Kashyap, R. L. 1982 Optimal choice of AR and MA parts in autoregressive moving average models. IEEE Trans. Pattern Analysis Machine Intellig. 4, 99-104.
19. Leclerc, Y. G. 1989 Constructing simple stable descriptions for image partitioning. Int. J. Computer Vision 3, 73-102.
20. Leonardis, A., Gupta, A. & Bajcsy, R. 1990 Segmentation as the search for the best description of the image in terms of primitives. In Proc. 3rd Int. Conf. on Computer Vision, Osaka, pp. 121-125. IEEE.
21. McLachlan, G. I. & Basford, K. 1988 Mixture models: inference and applications to clustering. New York: Marcel Dekker.
22. p. Technometrics 15, 661-675.
23. Mirza, M. J. & Boyer, K. L. 1992 An information theoretic robust sequential procedure for surface model order selection in noisy range data. In Proc. CVPR92, pp. 366-371. Los Alamitos, CA: IEEE Computer Society Press.
24. Mundy, J. & Zisserman, A. 1992 Geometric invariance in computer vision. MIT press.
25. Redner, R. A. & Walker, H. F. 1984 Mixture densities, maximum likelihood and the EM algorithm. SIAM Rev. 26, 195-239.
26. Rissanen, J. 1978 Modeling by shortest data description. Automatica 14, 465-471.
27. Rosin, P. 1998 Thresholding for change detection. In Proc. ICCV98 (ed. U. Desai), pp. 274-279. Narosa Publishing.
28. Schwarz, G. 1978 Estimating dimension of a model. Ann. Stat. 6, 461-464.
29. Solomonoff, R. 1964 A formal theory of inductive inference i. Informat. Control 7, 1-22.
30. Takane, Y. & Bozdogan, H. (eds) 1987 Psychometrika 52(3). (Special Issue.)
31. Torr, P. H. S. 1995 Outlier detection and motion segmentation. Ph.D. thesis, Department of Engineering Science, University of Oxford, UK.
32. Torr, P. H. S. 1997 An assessment of information criteria for motion model selection. In CVPR97, pp. 47-53.
33. Torr, P. H. S. & Murray, D. W. 1994 Stochastic motion clustering. In Proc. 3rd European Conf. on Computer Vision, Stockholm (ed. J.-O. Eklundh), pp. 328-338. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 800/801. Springer.
34. Torr, P. H. S. & Murray, D. W. 1997 The development and comparison of robust methods for estimating the fundamental matrix. Int. J. Computer Vision 24, 271-300.
35. Torr, P. H. S. & Zisserman, A. 1997 Performance characterization of fundamental matrix estimation under image degradation. Machine Vision Applic. 9, 321-333.
36. Torr, P. H. S., Zisserman, A. & Maybank, S. 1998 Robust detection of degenerate configurations for the fundamental matrix. Computer Vision Image Understanding. (In the press.)
37. Wallace, C. S. & Freeman, P. R. 1987 Estimation and inference by compact coding. J. R. Statist. Soc. B 49, 240-265.