Study of allozyme diversity in guar [Cyamopsis tetragonoloba (L.) Taub.] germplasm

Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution

Volumn 51, Issue 7, 2004, Pages 735-746

  Brahmi, Pratibha ^a   Bhat, K V ^a   Bhatnagar, A K ^a  

^a NATIONAL BUREAU OF PLANT GENETIC RESOURCES   (India)

Author keywords

Allozyme; Cyamopsis tetragonoloba; Guar; Polymorphism

Indexed keywords

ALLOZYME; COMMERCIAL SPECIES; CROP; ENZYME; GENETIC VARIATION; POLYMORPHISM;

ASIA; EURASIA; INDIA; PAKISTAN; SOUTH ASIA;

CYAMOPSIS; CYAMOPSIS TETRAGONOLOBA; EMBRYOPHYTA;

EID: 3242737524     PISSN: 09259864     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1023/B:GRES.0000034581.71299.8b     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Acquaah G., Isleib T.G. and Forguson A.E. 1994. Gene pool specificity, paucity of enzyme variation and phaseolin polymorphism in the common bean. Hort. Sci. 29: 1337-1339.
2. Bretting P.K. and Widrlechner M.P. 1995. Genetic markers and horticultural germplasm management. Hort. Sci. 30: 1349
3. Cardy B.J, Stuber C.W. and Goodman M.M. 1981. Techniques for Starch Gel Electrophoresis of Enzymes from Maize (Zea mays L.). Institute of Statistics, Mimeo series No. 1317. North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, USA.
4. Crawford D.J. 1990. Plant Molecular Systematics. John Wiley and Sons, New York.
5. CSIR, 1997. Wealth of India, Raw Materials, vol. II, New Delhi.
6. Dabas B.S., Phogat B.S. and Rana R.S. 1995. Genetic resources of clusterbean in India. In: Sharma B. (ed.), Genetic Research and Education: Current Trends and the Next 50 Years. Indian Society of Genetics and Plant Breeding, New Delhi, pp. 63-70.
7. Dabas B.S., Thomas T.A. and Mehra K.L. 1981. Catalogue on Cyamopsis tetragonoloba (L). Taub. (guar) germplasm (1) National Bureau of Plant Genetic Resource, New Delhi.
8. Dabas B.S., Thomas T.A., Nagpal R. and Chopra D.P. 1989. Catalogue on Guar Germplasm No. 2. NBPGR, New Delhi.
9. Dwivedi N.K., Bhandari D.C., Dabas B.S., Agrawal R.C., Mandal S. and Rana R.S. 1995. Catalogue on Guar germplasm. Part III. NBPGR, New Delhi.
10. Gottlieb L.D. 1977. Electrophoretic evidence and plant systematics. Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard. 64: 161-180.
11. Gottlieb L.D. 1981. Electrophoretic evidence and plant populations. Prog. Phytochem. 7: 1-46.
12. Griffin J.D. and Palmer R.G. 1995. Variability of 13 isozyme loci in the USDA soybean germplasm collection. Crop Sci. 35: 897-904.
13. Hamrick J.L. 1987. Gene flow and distribution of genetic variation in plant populations. In: Urbanska K.M. (ed.), Differentiation Patterns in Higher Plants, Academic Press, Florida, pp. 53-67.
14. Hamrick J.L. and Godt M.J.W. 1997. Allozyme diversity in cultivated crops. Crop. Sci. 37: 26-30.
15. Hunter R. and Markert C. 1957. Histochemical demonstration of enzymes separated by zone electrophoresis in starch gels. Science 125: 1294-1295.
16. Hymowitz T. and Matlock R.S. 1963. Guar in the United States. Oklahoma Agric. Exp. Stn. Bull. B 611: 1-34.
17. ICAR, 1970. Pulse Crops in India. Indian Council of Agricultural Research, New Delhi, India.
18. Labdi M., Robertson L.D., Singh K.B. and Charrier A. 1996. Genetic diversity and phylogenetic relationships among annual Cicer species as revealed by isozyme polymorphism. Euphytica 88: 181-188.
19. Lewontin R.C. and Hubby J.L. 1966. A molecular approach to the study of genetic heterozygosity in natural populations. II. Amount of variation and degree of heterozygosity in natural populations of Drosophila pseudoobscura. Genetics 54: 595-609.
20. Loveless M.D. and Hamrick J.L. 1984. Ecological determinants of genetic structure in plant populations. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 15: 65-95.
21. Mauria S. 2000. Isozyme diversity in relation to domestication of gaur [Cyamopsis tetragonoloba (L.) Taub.]. Indian J. Plant Genet. Resour. 13: 1-10.
22. Mittal R.K., Singh M. and Maherchandani N. 1987. Isozyme diversity index of Vigna parents in relation to heterosis for seed yield in green gram (Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek). Euphytica 36: 61-68.
23. Nei M. 1973. Analysis of gene diversity in subdivided populations. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA 70: 3321-3323.
24. Paredes O.M. and Gepts P. 1995. Extensive introgression of Middle American germplasm into Chilean common bean cultivars. Genet. Resour. Crop Evol. 42: 29-41.
25. Pinkas R., Zamir D. and Ladizinsky G. 1985. Allozyme divergence and evolution in the genus Lens. Plant. Syst. Evol. 151: 131-140.
26. Rohlf F.J. 1993. Numerical Taxonomy and Multivariate Analysis V. 1.70. Exeter Software Setauket, New York, USA.
27. Schoen D.J. and Brown A.H.D. 1992. Intraspecific variation in population gene diversity and effective population size correlates with the mating system in plants. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 8: 4494-4497.
28. Shaw C.R. and Prasad R. 1970. Starch gel electrophoresis of enzymes - a compilation of recipes. Biochem. Genet. 4: 297-320.
29. Shields C.R., Orton T.J. and Stuber C.W. 1983. An outline of general resources needs and procedures for the electrophoretic separation of active enzymes from plant tissue. In: Tanksley S.D., Orton T.J. and Stuber C.W. (eds), Isozymes in Plant Genetics and Breeding. Part A. Elsevier Science Publishers, B.V. Amsterdam, The Netherlands, pp. 443-465.
30. Sonnante G., Spinosa A., Marangi A. and Pignone D. 1997. Isozyme and RAPD analysis of genetic diversity within and between Vigna luteola and V. marina. Ann. Bot. 80: 741-746.
31. Vaillancourt R.E., Weeden N.F. and Barnard J. 1993. Isozyme diversity in cowpea species complex. Crop Sci. 33: 606-613.