Phase I clinical evaluation of near-simultaneous computed tomographic image-guided stereotactic body radiotherapy for spinal metastases

International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics

Volumn 59, Issue 5, 2004, Pages 1288-1294

  Chang, Eric L ^a   Shiu, Almon S ^a   Lii, Ming Fwu ^a   Rhines, Laurence D ^a   Mendel, Ehud ^a   Mahajan, Anita ^a   Weinberg, Jeffrey S ^a   Mathews, Leni A ^a   Brown, Barry W ^a   Maor, Moshe H ^a   Cox, James D ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS MD ANDERSON CANCER CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

Extracranial; Image guided radiotherapy; Metastases; Spine; Stereotactic

Indexed keywords

CLINICAL EVALUATION; STEREOTACTIC BODY;

COMPUTERIZED TOMOGRAPHY; DISEASE CONTROL; MEDICAL IMAGING; PATIENT MONITORING; RADIOTHERAPY; TISSUE; TOXICITY;

RADIOLOGY;

ACCURACY; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; EVALUATION; FATIGUE; FEASIBILITY STUDY; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; MALE; NEUROTOXICITY; PATIENT POSITIONING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROBABILITY; RADIATION DOSE; RADIATION DOSE FRACTIONATION; RADIATION INJURY; SAFETY; SPINAL CORD METASTASIS; STEREOTAXIS;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; CONFIDENCE INTERVALS; FEASIBILITY STUDIES; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; RADIOTHERAPY, CONFORMAL; SPINAL NEOPLASMS; STEREOTAXIC TECHNIQUES; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED;

EID: 3242734176     PISSN: 03603016     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2004.04.025     Document Type: Article

References (11)

1. Janjan N.A., Delclos M.E., Ballo M.T., et al. Palliative care. Cox J.D., Ang K.K. Radiation oncology rationale, technique, results. 8th ed:2003;954-986 Mosby, St. Louis
2. Arcangeli G., Micheli A., Arcangeli G., et al. The responsiveness of bone metastases to radiotherapy The effect of site, histology and radiation dose on pain relief. Radiother Oncol. 14:1989;95-101
3. Hamilton A.J., LuLu B.A., Fosmire H., et al. Preliminary clinical experience with linear accelerator-based spinal stereotactic radiosurgery. Neurosurgery. 36:1995;311-319
4. Bilsky M.H., Yamada Y., Yenice K., et al. Intensity-modulated stereotactic radiotherapy of paraspinal tumors A preliminary report. Neurosurgery. 54:2004;823-831
5. Ryu S., Yin F.F., Rock J., et al. Image-guided and intensity-modulated radiosurgery for patients with spinal metastasis. Cancer. 97:2003;2013-2018
6. Shiu A.S., Chang E.L., Ye J.-S., et al. Near simultaneous computed tomography image-guided stereotactic spinal radiotherapy An emerging paradigm for achieving true stereotaxy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 57:2003;605-613
7. Common Toxicity Criteria: Version 2.0 CTEP Website. Available at: http://ctep.info.nih.gov. Accessed May 11, 2004
8. Late Effects of Normal Tissue. Available at: http://rtog.org/members/ toxcity/soma.html. Accessed May 11, 2004
9. Clopper C.J., Pearson E.S. The use of confidence or fiducial limits illustrated in the case of the binomial. Biometrika. 26:1934;404-413
10. McCormick P.C., Torres R., Post K.D., et al. Intramedullary ependymoma of the spinal cord. J Neurosurg. 72:1990;523-532
11. Hartsell W.F., Scott C., Bruner D.W., et al. Phase III randomized trial of 8 Gy in 1 fraction vs. 30 Gy in 10 fractions for palliation of painful bone metastases: Preliminary results of RTOG 97-14. 57:(Suppl.):2003;124