Investigating the 'failure of further learning' effect in preservice science teacher education

International Journal of Science Education

Volumn 26, Issue 7, 2004, Pages 805-820

  Preece, Peter F W ^a   Postlethwaite, Keith C ^a   Skinner, Nigel C ^a   Simpson, Keith A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF EXETER   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 3242730193     PISSN: 09500693     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/0950069032000119410     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. DENNICK, R. and JOYES, G. (1994). New science teachers' subject knowledge. School Science Review, 76(275), 103-109.
2. DEPARTMENT FOR EDUCATION AND EMPLOYMENT (1998). Teaching: High Status, High Standards. Requirements for Courses of Initial Teacher Training (London: Department for Education and Employment).
3. DEPARTMENT FOR EDUCATION AND EMPLOYMENT (1999). Science. The National Curriculum for England (London: Department for Education and Employment and the Qualifications and Curriculum Authority).
4. DEPARTMENT FOR EDUCATION AND SKILLS (2002). Key Stage 3 National Strategy. Framework for Teaching Science: Years 7, 8 and 9 (London: Department for Education and Skills).
5. DRIVER, R., GUESNE, E. and TIBERGHIEN, A. (eds.) (1985). Children's Ideas in Science (Buckingham: Open University Press).
6. DUIT, R. (1991) Students' conceptual frameworks: consequences for learning science. In S. M. Glynn, R. H. Yearny and B. K. Britton (eds.) The Psychology of Science Learning (Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum), 65-85.
7. FRITZ, C. O., MORRIS, P. E., BJORK, R. A., GELMAN, R. and WICKENS, T. D. (2000). When further learning fails: stability and change following repeated presentation of text. British Journal of Psychology, 91, 493-511.
8. GRIFFARD, P. and WANDERSEE, J. (2001). A qualitative look at a quantitative approach to alternative conceptions research: the two-tier instrument. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, St Louis, MO, March.
9. HOWE, M. J. A. (1970). Repeated presentation and recall of meaningful prose. Journal of Educational Psychology, 61, 214-219.
10. KAY, H. (1955). Learning and retaining verbal material. British Journal of Psychology, 46, 81-100.
11. KLINE, P. (1994). An Easy Guide to Factor Analysis (London: Routledge).
12. LENTON, G. and TURNER, G. (1999). Student-teachers' grasp of science concepts. School Science Review, 81(295), 67-72.
13. LOCK, R. (2001). A-level biology teachers subject knowledge. Science Teacher Education, 31, 10-13.
14. LOCK, R. and SOARES, A. (2000). Auditing and developing student subject knowledge. Science Teacher Education, 28, 2-5.
15. NORMAN, D. A. (1982). Learning and Memory (San Francisco, CA: Freeman).
16. PFUNDT, H. and DUIT, R. (1991). Bibliography. Students' Alternative Frameworks and Science Education, 3rd edn. (Kiel: Institute for Science Education at the University of Kiel).
17. PREECE, P. F. W, (1997). Force and motion: pre-service and practising secondary science teachers' language and understanding. Research in Science and Technological Education, 15, 123-128.
18. RATCLIFFE, M. (1999). Science subject knowledge of pre-service postgraduate science teachers. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, Boston, MA, March.
19. ROGERS, A. (1986). Teaching Adults (Buckingham: Open University Press).
20. SHULMAN, L. S. (1987) Knowledge and teaching: foundations of the new reform. Harvard Education Review, 57, 1-22.
21. TEACHER TRAINING AGENCY (2002). Qualifying to Teach: Handbook of Guidance (London: Teacher Training Agency).
22. WILLSON, M. and WILLIAMS, D. (1996). Trainee teachers' misunderstandings in chemistry: diagnosis and evaluation using concept mapping. School Science Review, 77(280), 107-113.