A domain-specific visual language for domain model evolution

Journal of Visual Languages and Computing

Volumn 15, Issue 3-4, 2004, Pages 291-307

  Sprinkle, Jonathan ^a   Karsai, Gabor ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Domain evolution; Domain specific language; Graph rewriting; Metamodeling; XSL

Indexed keywords

EID: 3242725264     PISSN: 1045926X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jvlc.2004.01.006     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Lohr S. The Programmers who Created the Software Revolution-Go To 2001 Basic Books New York
2. Harel D. Rumpe B. Modeling languages: syntax, semantics, and all that stuff. Part I: the basic stuff, Technical Report MCS00-16, Mathematics - Computer Science, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot, Israel, 2000.
3. Johnson S. A portable compiler: theory and practice, in: Proceedings of the Fifth ACM Symposium on Principles of Programming Languages, 1978, pp. 97-104.
4. Ganapathi M. Fischer C. Hennessy J. Retargetable Compiler Code Generation ACM Computing Surveys 14 4 1982 573-592
5. Lawvere F.W. Schanuel S. Conceptual Mathematics: A First Introduction to Categories 1997 Cambridge University Press Cambridge, UK
6. West D. Introduction to Graph Theory 2nd Edition 2001 Prentice-Hall Upper Saddle River, NJ
7. Akehurst D.H. Model translation: a UML-based specification technique and active implementation approach, Ph.D. Thesis, University of Kent at Canterbury, UK, December 2000.
8. Bézivin J. Ploquin N. Tooling the MDA framework: a new software maintenance and evolution scheme proposal, in: OOPSLA, 2001: Workshop on Engineering Complex Object-Oriented Systems for Evolution, 2001.
9. Agrawal A. Levendovszky T. Sprinkle J. Shi F. Karsai G. Generative programming via graph transformations in the model-driven architecture, in: OOPSLA, 2002: Workshop on Generative Techniques in the Context of Model Driven Architecture, November 2002.
10. Blostein D. Schürr A. Computing with graphs and graph rewriting, in: Software-Practice and Experience, Sixth Proceedings in Informatics, 1997, pp. 1-21.
11. Schürr A. Specification of graph translators with triple graph grammars, Technical Report AIB 94-12, University of Aachen, 1994.
12. Schürr A. Adding graph transformation concepts to UMLs constraint language OCL, In: H. Ehrig, C. Ermel, J. Padberg (Eds.), Electronic Notes in Theoretical Computer Science, 44, Elsevier, 2001.
13. Engels G. Heckel R. From trees to graphs: defining the semantics of diagram languages with graph transformation, in: ICALP Satellite Workshops, Proceedings in Informatics, 2000, pp. 373-382.
14. Schürr A. Programmed Graph Replacement Systems, World Scientific, Singapore, 1997, pp. 479-546.
15. The Extensible Stylesheet Language (XSL), http://www.w3c.org/Style/XSL/
16. The Generic Modeling Environment, http://www.isis.vanderbilt.edu/
17. MetaEdit+, http://www.metacase.com/
18. The Domain Modeling Environment (DoME), http://www.htc.honeywell.com/ dome/
19. Balzer R. Goldman N. Wile D. On the transformational implementation approach to programming, in: Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Software Engineering, 1976, pp. 337-344.
20. Gerhart S. Correctness-preserving program transformations, in: Proceedings of the Second ACM SIGACT-SIGPLAN Symposium on Principles on Programming Languages, January 1975, pp. 54-66.