Development of a catalytic electron transfer system mediated by transition metal ate complexes: Applicability and tunability of electron-releasing potential for organic transformations

Journal of the American Chemical Society

Volumn 126, Issue 28, 2004, Pages 8755-8759

  Uchiyama, Masanobu ^a,c   Matsumoto, Yotaro ^a   Nakamura, Shinji ^a   Ohwada, Tomohiko ^a   Kobayashi, Nagao ^b   Yamashita, Natsuno ^b   Matsumiya, Atsushi ^b   Sakamoto, Takao ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TOKYO   (Japan)

^b TOHOKU UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^c JAPAN SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY AGENCY   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CHEMOSELECTIVE CLEAVAGES; ELECTRON TRANSFER (ET);

CATALYSIS; COMPLEXATION; ELECTROCHEMISTRY; KETONES; REDUCTION;

TRANSITION METAL COMPOUNDS;

AMIDE; COPPER COMPLEX; DIKETONE; DIPHENYLIODONIUM SALT; MAGNESIUM; MANGANESE; METAL COMPLEX; N PHENYLSULFONYL AMIDE; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ARTICLE; CATALYSIS; CHEMICAL MODIFICATION; CHEMICAL REACTION; COMPLEX FORMATION; ELECTROCHEMICAL ANALYSIS; ELECTRON TRANSPORT; METAL BINDING; REDUCTION;

EID: 3242722926     PISSN: 00027863     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/ja039674a     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Review: Brettle, R. In Comprehensive Organic Synthesis; Trost, B. M., Ed.; Pergamon Press: Oxford, 1991; Vol. 3, Chapter 2.7 and references therein.
2. For early examples, see: (a) Majerus, G.; Yax, E.; Ourisson, G. Bull. Soc. Chim. Fr. 1967, 4143-4147.
3. (b) Coulombeau, A.; Rassat, A. Chem. Commun. 1968, 1587-1589.
4. (c) Huffman, J. W.; Charles, J. T. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1968, 90, 6486-6492.
5. For early examples, see: (a) Bradlow, H. L.; Van der Verf, C. A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1947, 69, 1254-1256.
6. (b) Kegelman, M. R.; Brown, E. V. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1947, 69, 1254-1256.
7. 2 and related complexes; see: (a) Prasad, E.; Flowers, R. A., II. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 6357-6361.
8. (b) Prasad, E.; Flowers, R. A., II. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 6895-6899.
9. (c) Miller, R. S.; Sealy, J. M.; Shabangi, M.; Kuhlman, M. L.; Fuchs, J. R.; Flowers, R. A., II. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000, 122, 7718-7722.
10. (d) Prasad, E.; Knettle, B. W.; Flowers, R. A., II. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 14663-14667.
11. (a) Wittig, G. Q. Rev. 1966, 191-210.
12. (b) Tochtermann, W. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1966, 5, 351-375.
13. For reviews, see: (a) Kauffmann, T. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1996, 35, 386-403 and references therein.
14. (b) Shinokubo, H.; Oshima, K. J. Synth. Org. Chem. Jpn. 1999, 57, 27-37.
15. The absorptions of these ketyl species are consistent with the values previously reported; see: (a) Pons, S.; Davidson, T.; Bewick, A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1983, 105, 1802-1805.
16. (b) Bewick, A.; Jones, V. W.; Kalaji, M. Electrochim. Acta 1996, 41, 1961-1970 and references therein.
17. Greene, T. W.; Wuts, P. G. M. In Protective groups in organic synthesis, 2nd ed.; John Wiley & Sons: New York, 1991; Part 7.
18. Recently, the potential of the sulfonamide functionality as a protective group has been suggested, as exemplified by Fukuyama's (di) nitrophenylsulfonamide protecting group, which undergoes facile cleavage under basic conditions. (a) Fukuyama, T.; Jow, C.; Cheung, M. Tetrahedron Lett. 1995, 36, 6373-6374.
19. (b) Fukuyama, T.; Cheung, M.; Jow, C.; Hidai, Y.; Kan, T. Tetrahedron Lett. 1997, 38, 5831-5834.
20. (c) Fukuyama, T.; Cheung, M.; Kan, T. Synlett 1999, 8, 1301-1303.
21. The reductive deprotection of the N-sulfonyl moiety is also known to proceed via a ET process from alkali metals: (a) Heathcock, C. H.; Smith, K. M.; Blumenkopf, A. B. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1986, 108, 5022-5024.
22. (b) Schultz, A. G.; McCloskey, P. J.; Court, J. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1987, 109, 6493-6502.
23. (c) Yamazaki, N.; Kibayashi, C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1989, 111, 1396-1408.
24. (d) Ji, S.; Gortler, L. B.: Waring, A.; Battisti, A.; Bank, S.; Closson, W. D. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1967, 89, 5311-5312.
25. Low-valent lanthanides: (e) Vedejs, E. J. Org. Chem. 1994, 59, 1602-1603.
26. Commercially available Mg turnings were used.
27. Greene, T. W.; Wuts, P. G. M. In Protective Groups in Organic Synthesis, 2nd ed.; John Wiley & Sons: New York, 1991; Parts 2 and 3.
28. Review: Knight, D. W. In Comprehensive Organic Synthesis; Trost, B. M., Ed.; Pergamon Press: Oxford, 1991; Vol. 3, Chapter 2.3 and references therein.
29. Larock, R. C. In Comprehensive Organic Transformations; VCH: New York, 1989; p 412.
30. (a) Stang, P. J.; Zhdankin, V. V. Chem. Rev. 1996, 96, 1123-1178.
31. (b) Ochiai, M. In Chemistry of Hypervalent Compounds; Akiba, K., Ed.; Wiley-VCH: New York, 1999.
32. 3MnLi selectively gave 4-allyloxyphenol. These results clearly indicate that the present catalytic ET reactions can be controlled by the choice of ET ate complex (mediator), not by Mg (Figure 2).
33. 3Mn(II)Li, the reactions were uncontrolled.
34. For a review on the pinacol coupling reactions, see: Robertson, G. M. In Comprehensive Organic Synthesis; Trost, B. M., Ed.; Pergamon Press: Oxford, 1991; Vol. 3, Chapter 2.6.
35. The alkoxide ligated Mn(II)-ates, Co(II)-ates, and Fe(II)-ate are little known; see ref 6a.
36. In recent publications, we revealed that tetracoordinated dianion-type zincates have a higher transference aptitude for ligands than tricoordinated monoanion-type zincates; see: (a) Uchiyama, M.; Koike, M.; Kameda, M.; Kondo, Y.; Sakamoto, T. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1996, 118, 8733-8734.
37. (b) Uchiyama, M.; Kondo, Y.; Miura, T.; Sakamoto, T. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1997, 119, 12372-12373.
38. (c) Uchiyama, M.; Kameda, M.; Mishima, O.; Yokoyama, N.; Koike, M.; Kondo, Y.; Sakamoto, T. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1998, 120, 4934-4946.
39. (d) Kobayashi, M.; Matsumoto, Y.; Uchiyama, M.; Ohwada, T. Macromolecules 2004, 37, 4339-4341.
40. Bredas, J.-L.; Skotheim, T. A. In Handbook of Conducting Polymers; Marcel Dekker: New York, 1986.