Comparison of dental arch and alveolar widths of patients with class II, division 1 malocclusion and subjects with class I ideal occlusion

Angle Orthodontist

Volumn 74, Issue 3, 2004, Pages 356-360

  Sayin, M Ozgur ^a   Turkkahraman, Hakan ^a  

^a SULEYMAN DEMIREL UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

Alveolar width; Class II malocclusion; Transverse discrepancy

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ARTICLE; CANINE TOOTH; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DISEASE SEVERITY; EVALUATION; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALOCCLUSION; MAXILLA; MEASUREMENT; MOLAR TOOTH; PATIENT; PREMOLAR TOOTH; TOOTH ARCH; TOOTH SOCKET;

EID: 3242722256     PISSN: 00033219     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Ast DB, Carlos JP, Cons DC. Prevalence and characteristics of malocclusion among senior high school students in up-state New York. Am J Orthod. 1965;51:437-445.
2. Moyers RE. Handbook of Orthodontics. Chicago, Ill: Year Book Med Publishers; 1988: 191.
3. Burgersdijk R, Truin GJ, Frankenmolen F, Kalsbeek H, van't Hot M, Mulder J. Malocclusion and orthodontic treatment need of 15-74-year-old Dutch adults. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 1991;19:64-67.
4. Tang EL. The prevalence of malocclusion amongst Hong Kong male dental students. Br J Orthod. 1994;21:57-63.
5. Willems G, De Bruyne I, Verdonck A, Fieuws S, Carels C. Prevalence of dentofacial characteristics in a Belgian orthodontic population. Clin Oral Investig. 2001;5:220-226.
6. Silva RG, Kang DS. Prevalence of malocclusion among Latino adolescents. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2001;119:313-315.
7. Lauc T. Orofacial analysis on the Adriatic islands: an epidemiological study of malocclusions on Hvar Island. Eur J Orthod. 2003;25:273-278.
8. Bishara SE, Bayati P, Jakobsen JR. Longitudinal comparisons of dental arch changes in normal and untreated Class II, division 1 subjects and their clinical implications. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1996;110:483-489.
9. Tollaro I, Baccetti T, Franchi L, Tanesescu CD. Role of posterior transverse interarch discrepancy in Class II, division 1 malocclusion during the mixed dentition phase. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1996;110:417-422.
10. Baccetti T, Franchi L, McNamara JA Jr, Tollaro I. Early dentofacial features of Class II malocclusion: a longitudinal study from the deciduous through the mixed dentition. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1997;11:502-509.
11. McNamara JA Jr, Brudon WL, Kokich VG. Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics. Ann Arbor, Mich: Needham Press; 2001: 63-84.
12. McNamara JA Jr. Early intervention in the transverse dimension: is it worth the effort? Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2002;121:572-574.
13. Varella J. Early developmental traits in Class II malocclusion. Acta Odontol Scand. 1998;56:375-377.
14. Fröhlich FJ. A longitudinal study of untreated Class II type malocclusion. Trans Eur Orthod Soc. 1961;37:137-159.
15. Staley RN, Stuntz WR, Peterson LC. A comparison of arch widths in adults with normal occlusion and adults with Class II, division 1 malocclusion. Am J Orthod, 1985;88:163-169.
16. Buschang PH, Stroud J, Alexander RG. Differences in dental arch morphology among adult females with untreated Class I and Class II malocclusion. Eur J Orthod. 1994;16:47-52
17. Burstone CE. A study of individual variation in mandibular bicanine dimension during growth. Am J Orthod. 1952;38:848-865.
18. DeKock WH. Dental arch depth and width studied longitudinally from 12 years of age to adulthood. Am J Orthod. 1972;62:56-66.
19. Knott VB. Longitudinal study of dental arch widths at four stages of dentition. Angle Orthod. 1972;42:387-394.
20. Bishara SE, Jakobsen JR, Treder J, Nowak A. Arch width changes from 6 weeks to 45 years of age. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1997;111:401-409.
21. Moorrees CFA. The Dentition of the Growing Child. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press; 1959: 87-110.
22. Sillman JH. Dimensional changes of the dental arches: longitudinal study from birth to 25 years. Am J Orthod. 1964;50:824-841.