The human tissue bill: Good for consent but is it good for patients?

Annals of Clinical Biochemistry

Volumn 41, Issue 4, 2004, Pages 257-

  Barth, Julian H ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CADAVER; CLINICAL LABORATORY; DOCTOR PATIENT RELATION; EDITORIAL; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HISTOPATHOLOGY; HUMAN; INFORMED CONSENT; LABORATORY DIAGNOSIS; LAW; MEDICAL AUDIT; MEDICAL PRACTICE; MEDICOLEGAL ASPECT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; TISSUE PRESERVATION;

AUTOPSY; GREAT BRITAIN; HUMANS; INFORMED CONSENT; LABORATORIES; LEGISLATION, MEDICAL; PATHOLOGY; SPECIMEN HANDLING; TISSUE AND ORGAN HARVESTING;

EID: 3242712160     PISSN: 00045632     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1258/0004563041201536     Document Type: Editorial

References (3)

1. Royal Liverpool Children's Inquiry. The report of the Royal Liverpool Children's Inquiry (the 'Richards report'), 2001. Available at: www.rlcinquiry.org.uki
2. The Human Tissue Bill. Comments from The Royal College of Pathologists. Available at: www.rcpath.org/
3. Human Tissue Bill, The Stationery Office, 2004. Available at: http://www.parliament.the-stationery-office.co.uk/pa/cm200304/cmbills/009/ 2004009.htm