Using Concept Maps and Interpretive Essays for Assessment in Mathematics

School Science and Mathematics

Volumn 99, Issue 1, 1999, Pages 19-30

  Bolte, Linda A ^a  

^a EASTERN WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 3242698390     PISSN: 00366803     EISSN: 19498594     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1949-8594.1999.tb17442.x     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Angelo, T., & Cross, K. P. (1993). Classroom assessment techniques: A handbook for college teachers. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
2. Bartels, B. (1995). Promoting mathematics connections with concept mapping. Mathematics Teaching in the Middle School, 1, 542–549.
3. Beyerbach, B. (1988). Developing a technical vocabulary on teacher planning: Preservice teachers' concept maps. Teaching & Teacher Education, 4, 339–347.
4. Birken, M. (1989). Using writing to assist learning in college mathematics classes. In P. Connolly & T. Vilardi (Eds.), Writing to learn mathematics and science (pp. 33–47). New York: Teachers College Press.
5. Borasi, R. (1993). The invisible hand operating in mathematics instruction: Students' conceptions and expectations. In N. Webb (Eds.), Assessment in the mathematics classroom, 1993 Yearbook (pp. 174–181). Reston, VA: NCTM.
6. Borasi, R. & Rose, B. J. (1989). Journal writing and mathematics instruction. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 20, 347–65.
7. Chi, M. (1978). Knowledge structures and memory development. In R. Siegler (Eds.), Children's thinking; What develops? (pp. 73–96). Hillsdale. NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
8. Clarke, D. (1993). Probing the structure of mathematical writing. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 25, 235–50.
9. Clarke, D. J., Clarke, D. M., & Lovitt, C. (1990). Changes in mathematics teaching call for assessment alternatives. In T. Cooney & C. Hirsch (Eds.), Teaching and learning mathematics in the 1990s, 1990 Yearbook (pp. 118–129). Reston, VA: NCTM.
10. Connolly, P., & Vilardi, T., (Eds.) (1989). Writing to learn mathematics and science. New York: Teachers College Press.
11. Cooney, T., Badger, E., & Wilson, M. (1993). Assessment, understanding mathematics, and distinguishing visions from mirages. In N. Webb (Eds.), Assessment in the mathematics classroom, 1993 Yearbook, (pp. 239–247). Reston, VA: NCTM.
12. Hasemann, K., & Mansfield, H. (1995). Concept mapping in research on mathematical knowledge development: Background, methods, findings, and conclusions. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 29, 45–72.
13. Hiebert, J., & Carpenter, T. (1992). Learning and teaching with understanding. In D. A. Grouws (Eds.), Handbook for research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 65–97). New York:Macmillan.
14. Kounba, V. (1994). Self-evaluation as an act of teaching. Mathematics Teacher, 87, 354–58.
15. Mansfield, H., & Happs, J. (1991). Concept maps. Australian Mathematics Teacher, 47(3), 30–33.
16. Miller, L. D. (1992). Teacher benefits from using impromptu writing prompts in algebra class. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 23, 329–340.
17. Miller, L. D., & England, D. A. (1989). Writing to leam algebra. School Science and Mathematics, 89, 299–312.
18. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (1989). Curriculum and evaluation standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.
19. Novak, J. (1984). Learning how to leam. New York: Cambridge University Press.
20. Novak, J. (1991). Clarify with concept maps. Science Teacher, 58(7), 44–49.
21. Powell, A., & Lopez, J. (1989). Writing as a vehicle to learn mathematics: A case study. In P. Connolly & T. Vilardi (Eds.), Writing to learn mathematics and science (pp. 157–177). New York: Teachers College Press.
22. Quillian, M. (1968). Semantic memory. In M. Minsky (Ed), Semantic information processing (pp. 227–270). Cambridge: MIT Press.
23. Research Advisory Committee (1990). Mathematics education reform and mathematics education research: Opportunities, obstacles, and obligations. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 21, 287–292.
24. Roberts, W., (Ed.) (1996). Calculus: Ttiedynamics of change. Washington, DC: Mathematical Association of America.
25. Sierpinska, A., Kilpatrick, J., Balacheff, N., Howson, A., Sfard, A., & Steinbring, H. (1993). What is research in mathematics education, and what are its results Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 24, 274–278.
26. Skemp, R. (1978). Relational understanding and instrumental understanding. Arithmetic Teacher, 25(3), pp. 9–15.
27. Steen, L., Goldstein, J., Jones, E., Lutzer, D., Treisman, P., & Tucker, A. (1990). Challenges for college mathematics: An agenda for the next decade. Washington, DC: Mathematical Association of America.
28. Sterrett, (Ed.) (1990). Using writing to teach mathematics. Washington, DC: Mathematical Association of America.
29. Swinson, K. (1992). Writing activities as strategies for knowledge construction and identification of misconceptions in mathematics. Journal of Science and Mathematics Education in Southeast Asia, 15(2), 7–14.
30. Webb, N. (1993). Assessment for the mathematics classroom. In N. Webb (Eds.), Assessment in the mathematics classroom, 1993 Yearbook (pp. 1–6). Reston, VA: NCTM.