A quantitative algorithm for parameter estimation in magnetic induction tomography

Measurement Science and Technology

Volumn 15, Issue 7, 2004, Pages 1412-1419

  Casanova, R ^a   Silva, A ^a   Borges, A R ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF AVEIRO   (Portugal)

Author keywords

Laplace equation; Magnetic induction tomography; Nonlinear inverse problem

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHMS; ELECTRIC CONDUCTIVITY; MAGNETIC PERMEABILITY; PARAMETER ESTIMATION; PROBLEM SOLVING; VECTORS;

MAGNETIC INDUCTION TOMOGRAPHY; SPATIAL DISTRIBUTION;

TOMOGRAPHY;

MEASUREMENT METHOD;

EID: 3242689920     PISSN: 09570233     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1088/0957-0233/15/7/025     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Peyton A J, Yu Z Z, Lyon G M, AI-Zeibak S, Ferreira J, Velez J, Linares F, Borges A R, Xiong H L, Saunders N H and Beck M 1996 An overview of electromagnetic inductance tomography: description of three different systems Meas. Sci. Technol. 7 261-71
2. Griffiths H 2001 Magnetic induction tomography Meas. Sci. Technol. 12 1126-31
3. Watson S, Morris A, Williams R J, Gough W and Griffiths H 2002 The Cardiff magnetic induction tomography system International Federation for Medical and Biological Engineering EMBEC (Vienna, Austria) pp 116-7
4. Tapp H S, Goss D, Mackin R O, Crescenzo E, Wan-Daud W, Ktistis C and Peyton A J 2003 A combined digital camera-EMT system to measure human body composition 3rd World Congress on Industrial Process Tomography (Banff, Canada) pp 384-90
5. Soleimani M, Lionheart W, Riedel C and Dossel O 2003 Forward problem in 3D magnetic induction tomography (MIT) 3rd World Congress on Industrial Process Tomography (Banff, Canada) pp 275-80
6. Korjenevsky A and Sapetsky A 2001 Internal structure visualization of extensive electroconductive bodies by means of magnetic induction tomography Bull. Russ. Acad. Sci.: Phys. 5 1945-9
7. Merwa R, Hollaus K, Biro O and Scharfetter H 2004 Detection of brain oedema using magnetic induction tomography: a feasibility study of the likely sensitivity and detectability Physiol. Meas. 25 347-54
8. Ola P and Somersalo E 1996 Electromagnetic inverse problems and generalized Sommerfeld potentials SIAM J. Appl. Math. 56 1129-45
9. Peyton A, Beck M, Borges A R, Oliveira J, Lyon G, Yu Z, Brown M and Ferreira J 1999 Development of electromagnetic tomography (EMT) for industrial applications. Part 1: sensor design and instrumentation Proc. 1st World Congress on Industrial Process Tomography (Buxton, UK) pp 306-12
10. Ferreira J, Linhares F, Velez J, Oliveira J and Borges A R 1996 Imaging of conductive and ferromagnetic materials using a magnetic induction technique Proc. 12th Annual Review of Progress in Applied Computational Electromagnetics (Monterrey, CA)
11. Binns K J, Lawrenson P J and Trowbridge C W 1992 The Analytical and Numerical Solution of Electric and Magnetic Fields (New York: Wiley)
12. Seagar A D, Yeo T S and Bates R 1984 Full wave computed tomography. Part 2: resolution limits Proc. IEE 130 616-22
13. Seagar A D and Bates R 1985 Full wave computed tomography. Part 4: low frequency electric current CT Proc. IEE 132 455-66
14. Isaacson D 1986 Distinguishability of conductivities by electric current computed tomography IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 5 91-5
15. Gisser D G, Isaacson D and Newell J C 1987 Current topics in impedance imaging Clin, Phys. Physiol. Meas. 8 39-46