Post-ERCP pancreatitis: Is the endoscopist's experience the major risk factor?

Journal of the Pancreas

Volumn 3, Issue 6, 2002, Pages 177-187

  Rabenstein, Thomas ^a   Hahn, Eckhart G ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HEIDELBERG   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ERLANGEN NUREMBERG   (Germany)

Author keywords

Cholangiopancreatography; Education, medical; Education, professional; Endoscopic retrograde adverse effects education methods trends utilization; Endoscopic adverse effects methods trends utilization; Professional practice; Sphincterotomy

Indexed keywords

ABDOMINAL PAIN; ARTICLE; COMPETENCE; DISEASE ASSOCIATION; ENDOSCOPIC RETROGRADE CHOLANGIOPANCREATOGRAPHY; ENDOSCOPIC SPHINCTEROTOMY; EXPERIENCE; HEALTH CARE POLICY; HUMAN; INCIDENCE; MEDICAL DOCUMENTATION; MEDICAL EDUCATION; MEDICAL EXPERT; MEDICAL SPECIALIST; METHODOLOGY; ODDI SPHINCTER; OUTCOMES RESEARCH; PANCREATITIS; QUALITY CONTROL; RISK FACTOR; RISK REDUCTION; SKILL; CLINICAL COMPETENCE; EDUCATION; ENDOSCOPY; REVIEW; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

CHOLANGIOPANCREATOGRAPHY, ENDOSCOPIC RETROGRADE; CLINICAL COMPETENCE; ENDOSCOPY; HUMANS; PANCREATITIS; RISK FACTORS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 3242680600     PISSN: 15908577     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Cotton PB, Lehman G, Vennes J, Geenen JE, Russell RCG, Meyers WC, et al. Endoscopic sphincterotomy complications and their management: an attempt at consensus. Gastrointest Endosc 1991; 37:383-93. [AN 91301427]
2. Cotton PB. So who needs teaching? Gastrointest Endosc 1974; 21:9-12. [AN 74307295]
3. Canto M, Chak M, Sivak MV, Pollack BJ, Elta G, Barnett J, et al. Acquisition of cognitive and technical competence in ERCP: a prospective multicenter study. Gastrointest Endosc 1997; 45:AB46.
4. Rabenstein T, Schneider HT, Nicklas M, Ruppert T, Katalinic A, Hahn EG, Ell C. Impact of skill and experience of the endoscopist on the outcome of endoscopic sphincterotomy techniques. Gastrointest Endosc 1999; 50:628-36. [AN 20007795]
5. Rabenstein T, Roggenbuck S, Framke B, Martus P, Fischer B, Nusko G, et al. Complications of endoscopic sphincterotomy: can heparin prevent acute pancreatitis after ERCP? Gastrointest Endosc 2002; 55:476-83. [AN 21920675]
6. Rabenstein T, Radespiel-Tröger M, Trautmann K, Sieber S, Hochberger J, Mühldorfer S, et al. Komplikationen der ERCP: Prospektive Risikofaktor-Analyse. Z Gastroenterol 2002; 40:691.
7. Canto M, Chak M, Sivak MV, Pollack BJ, Elta G, Barnett J, et al. Outcome of training in diagnostic and therapeutic ERCP: a prospective multicenter study. Gastrointest Endosc 1997; 45:AB46.
8. Petersen BT. ERCP outcomes: defining the operators, experience, and environments. Gastrointest Endosc 2002; 55:953-8. [AN 22021254]
9. Rabenstein T, Radespiel-Tröger M, Köhler C, Hochberger J, Mühldorfer S, Nusko G, et al. Was ist eine schwierige ERCP? Prospektive analyse von variablen mit einfluß auf den erfolg der ERCP. Z Gastroenterol 2002; 40:691.
10. Freeman ML, Nelson DB, Sherman S, Haber GB, Herman ME, Dorsher PJ, et al. Complications of endoscopic biliary sphincterotomy. N Engl J Med 1996; 335:909-18. [AN 96365275]
11. Freeman ML, DiSario JA, Nelson DB, Fennerty MB, Lee JG, Bjorkman DJ, et al. Risk factors for post-ERCP pancreatitis: a prospective, multicenter study. Gastrointest Endosc 2001; 54:425-34. [AN 21460528]
12. Rabenstein T, Ruppert T, Schneider HT, Hahn EG, Ell C. Benefits and risks of needle-knife papillotomy. Gastrointest Endosc 1997; 46:207-11. [AN 98017977]
13. Schutz SM, Abbott RM. Grading ERCPs by degree of difficulty: a new concept to produce more meaningful outcome data. Gastrointest Endosc 2000; 51:535-9. [AN 20265951]
14. Johnson JF, Cooper G, Eisen GM, Freeman M, Goldstein JL, Jensen DM, et al. Quality assessment of ERCP. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopacreatography. Gastrointest Endosc 2002; 56:165-9. [AN 22140161]
15. Friedland S, Soetikno RM, Vandervoort J, Montes H, Tham T, Carr-Locke DL. Bedside scoring system to predict the risk of developing pancreatitis following ERCP. Endoscopy 2002; 34:483-8. [AN 22043101]
16. Christoforidis E, Goulimaris I, Kanellos I, Tsalis K, Demetriades C, Betsis D. Post-ERCP pancreatitis and hyperamylasemia: patient-related and operative risk factors. Endoscopy 2002; 34:286-92. [AN 21929641]
17. Loperfido S, Angelini G, Benedetti G, Chilovi F, Costan F, De Berardinis F, et al. Major early complications from diagnostic and therapeutic ERCP: a prospective multicenter study. Gastrointest Endosc 1998; 48:1-10. [AN 98347799]
18. Masci E, Toti G, Mariani A, Curioni S, Lomazzi A, Dinelli M, et al. Complications of diagnostic and therapeutic ERCP: a prospective multicenter study. Am J Gastroenterol 2001; 96:417-23. [AN 21122345]
19. Rabenstein T, Schneider HT, Bulling D, Nicklas M, Katalinic A, Hahn EG, et al. Analysis of the risk factors associated with endoscopic sphincterotomy techniques: preliminary results of a prospective study, with emphasis on the reduced risk of acute pancreatitis with low-dose anticoagulation treatment. Endoscopy 2000; 32:10-9. [AN 20153125]
20. Sherman S, Ruffolo TA, Hawes RH, Lehman GA. Complications of endoscopic sphincterotomy. A prospective series with emphasis on the increased risk associated with sphincter of Oddi dysfunction and nondilated bile ducts. Gastroenterology 1991; 101:1068-75. [AN 91365172]
21. Sherman S, Lehman GA. ERCP- and endoscopic sphincterotomy induced pancreatitis. Pancreas 1991; 6:350-67. [AN 91319689]
22. Rabenstein T, Hahn EG. Post-ERCP pancreatitis: new momentum. Endoscopy 2002; 34:325-9. [AN 21929649]
23. Rabenstein T, Schneider HT, Hahn EG, Ell C. 25 years of endoscopic sphincterotomy in Erlangen: assessment of experience in the treatment of 3498 patients. Endoscopy 1998; 30(Supplement 2):A194-201. [AN 99129560]
24. Freeman ML. Towards improving outcomes of ERCP. Gastrointest Endosc 1998; 48:96-102. [AN 98347821]
25. Akashi R, Kiyozumi T, Tanaka T, Sakurai K, Oda Y, Sagara K. Mechanism of pancreatitis caused by ERCP. Gastrointest Endosc 2002; 55:50-4. [AN 21629113]
26. Sahel J. Komplikationen nach endoskopischer papillotomie: ergebnisse einer internationalen umfrage. Leber Magen Darm 1987; 17:364-70. [AN 88121112]
27. Ell C, Rabenstein T, Schneider HT, Ruppert T, Nicklas M, Bulling D, Hahn EG. Safety and efficacy of pancreatic sphincterotomy in chronic pancreatitis. Gastrointest Endosc 1998; 48:244-9. [AN 98415847]
28. Fogel EL, Eversman D, Jamidar P, Sherman S, Lehman GA. Sphincter of Oddi dysfunction: pancreaticobiliary sphincterotomy with pancreatic stent placement has a lower rate of pancreatitis than biliary sphincterotomy alone. Endoscopy 2002; 34:280-5. [AN 21929640]
29. Hellier MD, Morris AI. ERCP-training - time for change. Gut 2000; 47:459-60. [AN 20444117]
30. Eisen GM, Dominitz JA, Faigel DO, Goldstein JL, Kalloo AN, Petersen BT, et al. Guidelines for advanced endoscopic training. Gastrointest Endosc 2001; 53:846-8. [AN 21269173]
31. Jowell PS, Baillie J, Branch MS, Affronti J, Browning CL, Phillips Bute B. Quantitative assessment of procedural competence. A prospective study of training in endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Ann Intern Med 1966; 125:983-9. [AN 97093537]
32. Neumann M, Mayer G, Ell C, Reingruber B, Horbach T, Hohenberger W. The Erlangen Endo-Trainer: life-like simulation for diagnostic and interventional endoscopic retrograde cholangiography. Endoscopy 2000; 32:906-10. [AN 20535932]
33. Hochberger J, Maiss J, Magdeburg B, Cohen J, Hahn EG. Training simulators and education in gastrointestinal endoscopy: current status and perspectives in 2001. Endoscopy 2001; 33:541-9. [AN21330051]
34. Montes H, Ho KY, Sossenheimer MJ, Vandervoort J, Soektino R, Ruymann J, et al. Does the level of training or the number of endoscopists predict complications after ERCP? Gastrointest Endosc 1998; 125:AB56.
35. Harewood GC, Baron TH. An assessment of the learning curve for precut biliary sphincterotomy. Am J Gastroenterol 2002; 97:1708-12. [AN 22130045]