PRESENCE: The sense of believability of inaccessible worlds

Computers and Graphics (Pergamon)

Volumn 28, Issue 4, 2004, Pages 509-517

  Luciani, Annie ^a   Urma, Daniela ^a   Marlière, Sylvain ^a,b   Chevrier, Joël ^b  

^a Association pour la Création et la Recherche d'Outils d'Expression ACROE   (France)

^b LABORATOIRE DE CRISTALLOGRAPHIE   (France)

Author keywords

Computer arts; Haptic interaction; Nanomanipulation; Physically based multisensory rendering; Virtual reality

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER SIMULATION; HAPTIC INTERFACES; HUMAN COMPUTER INTERACTION; SENSORY PERCEPTION; TELECOMMUNICATION;

COMPUTER ARTS; HAPTIC INTERACTIONS; NANOMANIPULATION; PHYSICALLY BASED MULTISENSORY RENDERING;

VIRTUAL REALITY;

EID: 3242675995     PISSN: 00978493     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.cag.2004.04.006     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (16)

1. Heeter C. Being there. the subjective experience of presence Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments Reviews. 1(2):1992;262-271.
2. Barfield W., Weghorst S. The sense of presence within virtual environments: a conceptual framework. Human-computer interaction. software and hardware interfaces:1993;Elsevier Science Publishers, Amsterdam.
3. Robinett W. Switching among the four modes of a teleoperator system: teleoperation, simulation, replay and robot. International Conference on Artificial Reality and Tele-existence, Tokyo, Japan, December 1998.
4. Grant B, Helser A, Taylor II RM. Adding force display to a stereoscopic head-tracked projection display. Proceedings of the VRAIS '98, Atlanta, GA, 1998. p. 81-8.
5. Fong T, Conti F, Grange S, Baur C. Novel interfaces for remote driving: gesture, haptic and PDA. SPIE Telemanipulator and Telepresence Technologies VII, Boston, MA, November 2000.
6. d'Espagnat B. Veiled reality. an analysis of present-day quantum mechanical concepts:1995;Addison-Wesley, New York.
7. Cavusoglu M.C., Feygin D., Tendik F. A critical study of the mechanical and electrical properties of the phantom haptic interface and improvements for high performance control. Presence Reviews. 11(6):2002;555-568.
8. Szemes P.T., Ando N., Korondi P., Hashimoto H. Telemanipulation in the virtual nano reality. Transaction on Automatic Control and Computer Science. 45(49):2000;117-122.
9. Cadoz C. Réalités virtuelles. Collection Dominos, Flammarion, Paris, 1994 (translated in Spanish, Portuguese, Korean, Deutsch, Italian, Greek).
10. Mark W, Randolph S, Finch M, Van Verth J, Taylor II RM. Adding force feedback to graphics systems: issues and solutions. Computer Graphics: Proceedings of the SIGGRAPH '96, August 1996. p. 447-52.
11. Luciani A., Cadoz C., Florens J.L. The CRM device. a force feedback gestural transducer to real-time computer animation Displays. 15(3):1994;149-155.
12. Cadoz C, Luciani A, Florens JL. CORDIS-ANIMA: a Modeling and simulation system for sound and image synthesis: the general formalism. Computer Music Journal 1993; 17/1, pp. 19-29.
13. Luciani A, Jimenez S, Florens JL, Cadoz C, Raoult O. Computational physics: a modeler simulator for animated physical objects. Proceedings of the European Computer Graphics Conference and Exhibition, September. Amsterdam: Elsevier; 1991.
14. Florens JL. Real time bowed string synthesis with force feedback gesture. Invited Paper, Proceedings of Forum Acousticum, Sevilla, November 2002.
15. Taylor RM, Robinett W, Chi VL, Brooks Jr FP, Wright WV, Williams RS, Snyder EJ. The nanomanipulator: a virtual-reality interface for a scanning tunneling microscope. Computer Graphics: Proceedings of the SIGGRAPH '93, August 1993.
16. Guthold M., Falvo M., Matthews W.G., Paulson S., Negishi A., Washburn S., Superfine R., Brooks F.P., Taylor R.M. Investigation and modification of molecular structures using the nanomanipulator. Journal of Molecular Graphics & Modelling. 17:1999;187-197.