Infrared-triggered cameras for detecting wildlife: An evaluation and review

Wildlife Society Bulletin

Volumn 32, Issue 2, 2004, Pages 357-365

  Swann, Don E ^a,e,f,g   Hass, Christine C ^b,g,h,i   Dalton, David C ^c,j,k,l,m   Wolf, Sandy A ^a,d,e,g  

^a NATIONAL PARK SERVICE   (United States)

^b Audubon Appleton Whittell Res Ranch   (United States)

^c Coronado National Memorial ^*  (United States)

^d Brown University ^*  (United States)

^e Saguaro National Park   (United States)

^f BROWN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^g UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA   (United States)

^h UNIVERSITY OF MONTANA   (United States)

ⁱ UNIVERSITY OF NORTH DAKOTA   (United States)

^j Roper Scientific Inc   (United States)

^k Sherman H Masten Learning Resource Center   (United States)

^l RADFORD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^m VIRGINIA POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE AND STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

more..

Author keywords

Infrared; Photography; Remote camera; Sighting methods

Indexed keywords

INFRARED IMAGERY; METHODOLOGY; MONITORING; PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT; PHOTOGRAPHY;

ANIMALIA;

EID: 3242675412     PISSN: 00917648     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2193/0091-7648(2004)32[357:ICFDWA]2.0.CO;2     Document Type: Review

References (14)

1. BLEICH, V. C., R. T. BOWYER, AND J. D. WEHAUSEN. 1997. Sexual segregation in mountain sheep: resources or predation? Wildlife Monographs 134.
2. BULL, E. L., R. S. HOLTHAUSEN, AND L. R. BRIGHT. 1992. Comparison of 3 techniques to monitor marten. Wildlife Society Bulletin 20: 406-410.
3. CUTLER, T. L., AND D. E. SWANN. 1999. Using remote photography in wildlife ecology: a review. Wildlife Society Bulletin 27: 571-581.
4. FOSTER, M. L., AND S. R. HUMPHREY. 1995. Use of highway underpasses by Florida panthers and other wildlife. Wildlife Society Bulletin 23: 95-100.
5. HERNANDEZ, F., D. ROLLINS, AND R. CANTU. 1997. An evaluation of Trailmaster camera systems for identifying ground-nest predators. Wildlife Society Bulletin 25: 848-853.
6. KARANTH, K. U., AND J. D. NICHOLS. 1998. Estimation of tiger densities in India using photographic captures and recaptures. Ecology 79: 2852-2862.
7. KUCERA, T. E., AND R. H. BARRETT. 1993. The Trailmaster camera system for detecting wildlife. Wildlife Society Bulletin 21: 505-508.
8. MARTORELLO, D. A., T. H. EASON, AND M. R. PELTON. 2001. A sighting technique using cameras to estimate population size of black bears. Wildlife Society Bulletin 29: 560-567.
9. MORUZZI, T. L., T. K. FULLER, R. M. DEGRAAF, R. T. BROOKS, AND W. LI. 2002. Assessing remotely triggered cameras for surveying carnivore distribution. Wildlife Society Bulletin 30 380-386.
10. PETERSON, L. M., AND J. A. THOMAS. 1998. Performance of TrailMaster® infrared sensors in monitoring captive coyotes. Wildlife Society Bulletin 26: 592-596.
11. RICE, C. G. 1995. Trailmaster camera system: the dark side. Wildlife Society Bulletin 23: 110-111.
12. TROLLE, M., AND M. KERY. 2003. Estimation of ocelot density in the Pantanal using capture-recapture analysis of camera-trapping data. Journal of Mammalogy 84: 607-614.
13. WILSON, G. J., AND R. J. DELAHAY. 2001. A review of methods to estimate the abundance of terrestrial carnivores using field signs and observation. Wildlife Research 28: 151-164.
14. YORK, E. C., T. L. MORUZZI, T. K. FULLER, J. F. ORGAN, R. M. SALIVAJOT, AND R. M. DEGRAAF. 2001. Description and evaluation of a remote camera and triggering system to monitor carnivores. Wildlife Society Bulletin 29: 1228-1237.