Structural health monitoring and damage detection using an intelligent parameter varying (IPV) technique

International Journal of Non-Linear Mechanics

Volumn 39, Issue 10, 2004, Pages 1687-1697

  Saadat, Soheil ^a   Noori, Mohammad N ^a   Buckner, Gregory D ^a   Furukawa, Tadatoshi ^b   Suzuki, Yoshiyuki ^c  

^a North Carolina State University   (United States)

^b OSAKA UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^c KYOTO UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

Artificial neural networks; Damage detection; Hysteresis; Non linear systems; Structural health monitoring; System identification; Wavelet analysis

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER SIMULATION; DISASTERS; INFORMATION ANALYSIS; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; MATHEMATICAL TECHNIQUES; MONITORING; NATURAL FREQUENCIES; NEURAL NETWORKS; NONLINEAR SYSTEMS; PARAMETER ESTIMATION;

DAMAGE DETECTIONS; STRUCTURAL HEALTH MONITORING; SYSTEM IDENTIFICATIONS; WAVELET ANALYSIS;

STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS;

EID: 3242674324     PISSN: 00207462     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijnonlinmec.2004.03.001     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. S.W. Doebling, C.R. Farrar, M.B. Prime, D.W. Shevitz, Damage Identification and Health Monitoring of Structural and Mechanical Systems from Changes in Their Vibration Characteristics: A Literature Review, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, NM, LA-13070-MS, 1996.
2. Doebling S.W., Farrar C.R., Prime M.B., Shevitz D.W. A review of damage identification methods that examine changes in dynamic properties. Shock Vib. Dig. 30:1998;91-105.
3. M. Noori, F.-G. Yuan, S. Saadat, Z. Hou, A. Hera, A. Masuda, A. Sone, Recent and on-going efforts in structural health monitoring, in: K. Kawashima, B.F. Spencer Jr., Y. Suzuki (Eds.), US-Japan Workshop on Smart Structures for Improved Seismic Performance in Urban Regions, Seattle, WA, 2001, pp. 31-43.
4. Doherty J.E. Nondestructive evaluation. Kobayashi A.S. Handbook on Experimental Mechanics. 1987;Society for Experimental Mechanics, Englewood Cliffs, NJ. (Chapter 12).
5. Szewczyk P.Z., Hajela P. Damage detection in structures based on features-sensitive neural networks. ASCE J. Comput. Civil Eng. 8(2):1994;163-178.
6. Zang C., Imregun M. Structural damage detection using artificial neural networks and measured FRF data reduced via principal component projection. J. Sound Vib. 242(5):2001;813-827.
7. Haykin S.S. Neural Networks: A Comprehensive Foundation. 1999;Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ.
8. Masri S.F., Caughey T.K. A nonparametric identification technique for nonlinear dynamic problems. J. Appl. Mech. 46:1979;433-445.
9. K.S. Narendra, S. Mukhopadhyay, Neural networks for system identification, IFAC System Identification, Vol. 2, Kitakyushu, Fukuoka, Japan, 1997, pp. 735-744.
10. Masi S.F., Chassiakos A.G., Caughey T.K. Neural network approach to detection of changes in structural parameters. ASCE J. Eng. Mech. 122(4):1996;350-360.
11. Hung S.-L., Kao C.Y. Structural damage detection using the optimal weights of the approximating artificial neural networks. Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 31:2002;217-234.
12. Saadat S., Buckner G.D., Furukawa T., Noori M.N. An Intelligent Parameter Varying (IPV) Approach for Non-linear System Identification of Base Excited Structures. Int. J. Nonlinear Mech. 39(6):2004;993-1004.
13. Masuda A., Kakaoka A., Sone A., Yamamoto S. Health monitoring system of structures based on orthonormal wavelet transform. Seismic Eng. 312:1995;161-167.
14. Hou Z., Noori M., St. Amand R. Wavelet-based approach for structural damage detection. ASCE J. Eng. Mech. 126(7):2000;677-684.
15. Mallat M. A theory for multi-resolution signal decomposition. the wavelet representation IEEE Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 11(7):1989;659-674.
16. Tedesco J.W., McDougal W.G., Ross C.A. Structural Dynamics, Theory and Applications. 1999;Addison-Wesley Longman Inc. Menlo Park, CA.
17. Nelles O. Nonlinear System Identification: From Classical Approaches to Neural Networks and Fuzzy Models. 2001;Springer, New York.