Predicting competency in automated machine use in an acquired brain injury population using neuropsychological measures

Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology

Volumn 19, Issue 5, 2004, Pages 673-691

  Crowe, Simon F ^a   Mahony, Kate ^a   Jackson, Martin ^a  

^a LA TROBE UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

Automated; Ecological validity; Functional skill; Service delivery; Teller machines; Ticketing machines

Indexed keywords

ACADEMIC ACHIEVEMENT; ADULT; AGE DISTRIBUTION; AGED; ARTICLE; AUTOMATION; BRAIN INJURY; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COMPETENCE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DEMOGRAPHY; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT; HUMAN; JOB PERFORMANCE; MALE; MOTOR PERFORMANCE; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TEST; NEUROPSYCHOLOGY; PSYCHOLOGIC ASSESSMENT; SAMPLE SIZE; TASK PERFORMANCE; TELEPHONE;

EID: 3242667731     PISSN: 08876177     EISSN: 18735843     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.acn.2003.09.002     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Acker, M. B. (1990). Review of ecological validity of neuropsychological tests. In D. E. Tupper & K. D. Cicerone (Eds.), The neuropsychology of everyday life: Assessment and basic competencies (pp. 19-55). Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
2. Benton, A. L., & Hamsher, K. (1989). Multilingual Aphasia Examination. Iowa City, Iowa: AJA Associates.
3. Braver S.L., Smith M.C. Maximizing both external and internal validity in longitudinal true experiments with voluntary treatments: The "combined modified" design. Evaluation and Program Planning. 19:1996;287-300
4. Brown, M., Gordon, W. A., & Diller, L. (1983). Functional assessment and outcome measurement: An integrative review. In Annual review of rehabilitation (Vol. 3). New York: Springer.
5. Crowe S.F., Mahony K., O'Brien A., Jackson M. An evaluation of the usage patterns and competence in dealing with automated delivery of service in an acquired brain injury sample. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation. 13(5):2003;497-515
6. Burgess P.W., Alderman N., Evans J., Emslie H., Wilson B.A. The ecological validity of tests of executive function. Journal of International Neuropsychological Society. 4:1998;547-558
7. Chelune, G., & Moehle, K. (1986). Neuropsychological assessment and everyday functioning. In D. Wedding., A. M., Horton, & J. Webster (Eds.), The neuropsychology handbook: Behavioural and clinical perspectives (pp. 15-28). New York: Springer.
8. Goldberg E., Podell K. Adaptive decision making, ecological validity and the frontal lobes. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology. 22:2000;56-68
9. Higginson C.I., Arnett P.A., Voss W.D. The ecological validity of clinical tests of memory and attention in multiple sclerosis. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology. 15:2000;185-204
10. Holland N.J., Francabandera F., Wiesel-Levison P. International scale for assessment of disability in multiple sclerosis. Journal of Neuroscience Nursing. 18:1986;19-44
11. Lezak, M. D. (1995). Neuropsychological assessment (3rd ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.
12. Long, C. J., & Collins, L. F. (1997). Ecological validity and forensic neuropsychological assessment. In R. J. McCaffrey (Ed.), The practice of forensic neuropsychology: Meeting challenges in the courtroom (pp. 24-41). New York: Plenum.
13. Naugle, R. J., & Chelune, G. J. (1990). Integrating neuropsychological and "real-life" data: A neuropsychological model for assessing everyday functioning. In D. E. Tupper & K. D. Cicerone (Eds.), The neuropsychology of everyday life: Assessment and basic competencies (pp. 57-73). Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
14. Nelson, H. E., & Willison, J. (1991). National Adult Reading Test (NART) manual (2nd ed.). Windsor: NFER/Nelson.
15. O'Neill J., Cardenas V., Meyerhoff D.J. Effects of abstinence on brain: Quantitative magnetic resonance imaging and magnetic resonance spectroscopic imaging in chronic alcohol abuse. Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research. 25:2001;1673-1682
16. Ponsford, J., Sloan, S., & Snow, P. (1995). Traumatic brain injury: Rehabilitation for everyday adaptive living. Hove, UK: Lawrence Erlbaum.
17. Rey A. L'examen psychologique dans les cas d'encéphalopathie traumatique. Archives de Psychologie. 28:1941;286-340
18. Rey, A. (1964). L'examen clinique en psychologie. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
19. Seawright H.R., Goldberg M.A. The community competence scale as a measure of functional daily living skills. Journal of Mental Health Administration. 18:1991;128-134
20. Sbordone, R. J., & Guilmette, T.J. (1999). Ecological validity: Prediction of everyday and vocational functioning from neuropsychological tests data. In J. J. Sweet (Ed.), Forensic neuropsychology (pp. 227-254). Lisse: Swets and Zeitlinger.
21. Silberfeld, M., & Fish, A. (1994). When the mind fails: A guide to dealing with incompetency. Toronto: University of Toronto.
22. Spreen, O., & Strauss, E. (1998). A compendium of neuropsychological tests (2nd ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.
23. Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2001). Using multivariate statistics (4th ed.). Boston, MA.: Allyn and Bacon.
24. Tupper, D. E., & Cicerone, K. D. (1990). The neuropsychology of everyday life: Assessment and basic competencies (pp. 3-18). Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
25. Wechsler, D. (1987). The Wechsler Memory Scale - Revised. San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation.
26. Wechsler, D. (1997). The Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale - Third edition. San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation.
27. Wilson B.A. Ecological validity of neuropsychological assessment: Do neuropsychological indexes predict performance in everyday activities? Applied and Preventative Psychology. 2:1993;209-215