Neutron pole figures compared with magnetic preferred orientations of different rock types

Physica B: Condensed Matter

Volumn 350, Issue 4, 2004, Pages 120-122

  Hansen, Anke ^a   Chadima, Martin ^b   Cifelli, Francesca ^c   Brokmeier, Heinz Günter ^a   Siemes, Heinrich ^d  

^a CLAUSTHAL UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Germany)

^b MASARYK UNIVERSITY   (Czech Republic)

^c ROMA TRE UNIVERSITY   (Italy)

^d RWTH AACHEN UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

Author keywords

Crystallographic texture; Magnetic anisotropy; Rocks

Indexed keywords

CRYSTALLOGRAPHY; DEFORMATION; EIGENVALUES AND EIGENFUNCTIONS; GRANULAR MATERIALS; MAGNETIC ANISOTROPY; MAGNETIC SUSCEPTIBILITY; MAGNETIZATION; MINERALOGY; NEUTRON DIFFRACTION; ROCKS; TENSORS; TEXTURES;

CRYSTALLOGRAPHIC TEXTURE; DEFORMATION PATTERNS; NEUTRON TEXTURE GONIOMETRY; ROCK COMPOSITION;

NEUTRON BEAMS;

EID: 3242666334     PISSN: 09214526     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.physb.2004.04.008     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (8)

1. Hrouda F. Geol. Surv. 5:1982;37.
2. Borradaile G. Tectonophysics. 156:1988;37.
3. Brokmeier H. Physica B. 234-236:1997;1144.
4. F. Cifelli, et al., Geophys. Res. Lett. 31 (2004), in press.
5. Mattei M., et al. Tectonophysics. 307:1999;33.
6. Scheidegger A. US Geol. Surv. Prof. Papers. 525-C:1965;164.
7. Siemes H., et al. J. Struct. Geol. 22:2000;1747.
8. D.H. Tarling, et al., Chapman & Hall, London, 1993.