Dynamic MR imaging of brain tumors in low field using undersampled projection reconstruction

Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Volumn 22, Issue 6, 2004, Pages 799-805

  Yrjänä, Sanna K ^a   Vaara, Teuvo ^b   Karttunen, Ari ^a   Katisko, Jani ^a   Koivukangas, John ^a  

^a OULU UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Finland)

^b PHILIPS HEALTHCARE   (United States)

Author keywords

Dynamic MRI; Low field; Meningioma; Projection reconstruction; T1 weighted

Indexed keywords

GADOLINIUM PENTETATE MEGLUMINE;

ARTICLE; BRAIN TUMOR; CLINICAL FEATURE; CONCENTRATION (PARAMETERS); DEFENSE MECHANISM; IMAGING SYSTEM; LABORATORY TEST; MENINGIOMA; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE SPECTROSCOPY; PARAMETER; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS;

AGED; CONTRAST MEDIA; ECHO-PLANAR IMAGING; FEMALE; FIBROSIS; GADOLINIUM DTPA; HUMANS; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; INCIDENTAL FINDINGS; MENINGEAL NEOPLASMS; MENINGIOMA; MIDDLE AGED; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED;

EID: 3242661124     PISSN: 0730725X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.mri.2004.01.046     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Bullock P.R., Mansfield P., Gowland P., Worthington B.S., Firth J.L. Dynamic imaging of contrast enhancement in brain tumors. Magn Reson Med. 19:1991;293-298
2. Liang L., Korogi Y., Sugahara T., et al. Dynamic MR imaging of neurohypophyseal germ cell tumors for differential diagnosis of infundibular diseases. Acta Radiol. 41:2000;562-566
3. Joo Y.G., Korogi Y., Hirai T., et al. Differential diagnosis of extra-axial intracranial tumours by dynamic spin-echo MRI. Neuroradiology. 37:1995;522-525
4. Schwartz R.B., Hsu L., Kacher D.F., et al. Intraoperative dynamic MRI localization of sites of brain tumor recurrence after high-dose radiotherapy. J Magn Reson Imaging. 8:1998;1085-1089
5. Tofts P.S., Brix G., Buckley D.L., et al. Estimating kinetic parameters from dynamic contrast-enhanced T1-weighted MRI of a diffusible tracer standardized quantities and symbols. (review) J Magn Reson Imaging. 10:1999;223-232
6. Lüdemann L., Hamm B., Zimmer C. Pharmacokinetic analysis of glioma compartments with dynamic Gd-DTPA-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging. Magn Reson Imaging. 18:2000;1201-1214
7. Roberts H.C., Roberts T.P.L., Bollen A.W., Ley S., Brasch R.C., Dillon W.P. Correlation of microvascular permeability derived from dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging with histologic grade and tumor labeling index a study in human brain tumors. Acad Radiol. 8:2001;384-391
8. Lüdemann L., Grieger W., Wurm R., Budzisch M., Hamm B., Zimmer C. Comparison of dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI with WHO tumor grading for gliomas. Eur Radiol. 11:2001;1231-1241
9. Yrjänä S.K., Katisko J.P., Ojala R.O., Tervonen O., Schiffbauer H., Koivukangas J. Versatile intraoperative MRI in neurosurgery and radiology. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 144:2002;271-278
10. Parkkola R.K., Mattila K.T., Heikkilä J.T., et al. Dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging and MR-guided bone biopsy on a 0.23 T open imager. Skeletal Radiol. 30:2001;620-624
11. Lauterbur P.C. Image formation by induced local interactions examples employing nuclear magnetic resonance. Nature. 242:1973;190-191
12. Shankaranarayanan A., Simonetti O.P., Laub G., Lewin J.S., Duerk J.L. Segmented k-space and real-time cardiac cine MR imaging with radial trajectories. Radiology. 221:2001;827-836
13. Trouard T.P., Theilmann R.J., Altbach M.I., Gmitro A.F. High-resolution diffusion imaging with DIFRAD-FSE (diffusion-weighted radial acquisition of data with fast spin-echo) MRI. Magn Reson Med. 42:1999;11-18
14. Shankaranarayanan A., Wendt M., Aschoff A.J., Lewin J.S., Duerk J.L. Radial keyhole sequences for low field projection reconstruction interventional MRI. J Magn Reson Imaging. 13:2001;142-151
15. Peters D.C., Korosec F.R., Grist T.M., et al. Undersampled projection reconstruction applied to MR angiography. Magn Reson Med. 43:2000;91-101
16. Rand S., Maravilla K.R., Schmiedl U. Lesion enhancement in radio-frequency spoiled gradient-echo imaging theory, experimental evaluation, and clinical implications. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 15:1994;27-35
17. May D.A., Pennington D.J. Effect of gadolinium concentration on renal signal intensity an in vitro study with a saline bag model. Radiology. 216:2000;232-236
18. Weiss S., Rasche V. Projection-reconstruction reduces FOV imaging. Magn Reson Imaging. 17:1999;517-525
19. Callaghan P.T., Eccles C.D. Sensitivity and resolution in NMR imaging. J Magn Reson. 71:1987;426-445
20. Pipe J.G., Duerk J.L. Analytical resolution and noise characteristics of linearly reconstructed magnetic resonance data with arbitrary k-space sampling. Magn Reson Med. 34:1995;170-178
21. Lauzon M.L., Rutt B.K. Effects of polar sampling in k-space. Magn Reson Med. 36:1996;940-949
22. Lauzon M.L., Rutt B.K. Polar sampling in k-space reconstruction effects. Magn Reson Med. 40:1998;769-782
23. 99mTc-DTPA input curves. Magn Reson Imaging. 14:1996;235-241
24. Fritz-Hansen T., Rostrup E., Larsson H.B.W., Søndergaard L., Ring P., Henriksen O. Measurement of the arterial concentration of Gd-DTPA using MRI a step toward quantitative perfusion imaging. Magn Reson Med. 36:1996;225-231
25. Ikushima I., Korogi Y., Kuratsu J., et al. Dynamic MRI of meningiomas and schwannomas: is differential diagnosis possible? Neuroradiology. 39:1997;633-638