Zeta potential of clay minerals and quartz contaminated by heavy metals

Canadian Geotechnical Journal

Volumn 42, Issue 5, 2005, Pages 1280-1289

  Kaya, Abidin ^a   Yukselen, Y ^b  

^a URS CORPORATION   (United States)

^b DOKUZ EYLUL UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

Alkaline earth metals; Electrokinetic decontamination; Heavy metals; Zeta potential

Indexed keywords

ALKALINE EARTH METALS; CLAY MINERALS; CONTAMINATION; FLOW CONTROL; GEOCHEMISTRY; HEAVY METALS; HYDROLYSIS; PH EFFECTS; QUARTZ; SOILS;

ELECTROKINETIC DECONTAMINATION; PORE-FLUID CHEMISTRY; SUBSURFACE DECONTAMINATION; ZETA POTENTIAL;

DECONTAMINATION;

ALKALINE EARTH METALS; CLAY MINERALS; CONTAMINATION; DECONTAMINATION; FLOW CONTROL; GEOCHEMISTRY; HEAVY METALS; HYDROLYSIS; PH EFFECTS; QUARTZ; SOILS;

CLAY MINERAL; HEAVY METAL; POLLUTANT; QUARTZ;

EID: 32344441336     PISSN: 00083674     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1139/t05-048     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Acar, Y.B., and Alshawabkeh, A.N. 1993. Principles of electrokinetic remediation. Environmental Science & Technology, 27: 2638-2647.
2. Brand, F., Fourcade, M.C., Tellier, S., and Astruc, M. 1998. Modeling of decontamination rate in an electrokinetic soil processing. International Journal of Environmental Analytical Chemistry, 68: 105-121.
3. Casagrande, L. 1949. Electroosmosis in soil. Géotechnique, 1: 159-177.
4. Çelik, M.S., Akin, Y., and Hancer, M. 1996. Decompression of electrical double layer with monovalent cations. Presented at the annual meeting of the Society for Mining, Metallurgy, and Exploration (SME), Phoenix, Ariz., 11-14 March 1996. SME Preprint 96-91.
5. Chapman, H.D. 1965. Cation exchange capacity. In Methods of soil analysis. Edited by C.A. Black. American Society of Agronomy, Madison, Wisc. pp. 891-901.
6. Chorom, M., and Rengasamy, P. 1995. Dispersion and zeta potential of pure clays as related to net particle charge under varying pH, electrode concentration and cation type. European Journal of Soil Science, 46: 657-665.
7. Dillard, J.G., and Koppelmann, M.H. 1982. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopic (XPS) surface characterization of cobalt on the surface of kaolinite. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, 87: 47-55.
8. Dzenitis, J.M. 1997. Soil chemistry effects and flow prediction in electroremediation of soil. Environmental Science & Technology, 31: 1191-1197.
9. Eykholt, G.R., and Daniel, D.E. 1994. Impact of system chemistry on electroosmosis in contaminated soil. Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, ASCE, 120: 797-815.
10. Gray, D.H., and Mitchell, J.K. 1967. Fundamental aspects of electro-osmosis in soils. Journal of the Soil Mechanics and Foundations Division, ASCE, 93: 209-236.
11. Hamed, J.T., and Bhadra, A. 1997. Influence of current density and pH on electrokinetics. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 55: 279-294.
12. Johnson, P.R. 1999. A comparison of streaming and microelectrophoresis methods for obtaining the ζ potential of granular porous media surfaces. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, 209: 264-267.
13. Kaya, A., and Fang, H.-Y. 1996. Characterization of dielectric constant on fine-grained soil behavior. In Sampling environmental media. Edited by J.H. Morgan. American Society for Testing and Materials, West Conshohocken, Pa. ASTM STP 1282, pp. 303-314.
14. Kim, S.-O., Moon, S.-H., and Kim, K.-W. 2001. Removal of heavy metals from soils using enhanced electrokinetic soil processing. Water, Air, and Soil Pollution, 125: 259-272.
15. Lockhart, N.C. 1983. Electro-osmotic dewatering of clays. I: Influence of voltage. II: Influence of salt, acid, and flocculants. III: Influence of clay type, exchangeable cations, and electrode materials. Colloids and Surfaces, 6: 229-269.
16. Mitchell, J.K. 1993. Fundamentals of soil behavior. 2nd ed. John Wiley & Sons Inc., New York.
17. Page, M.M., and Page, C.L. 2002. Electroremediation of contaminated soils. Journal of Environmental Engineering, ASCE, 128: 208-219.
18. Shang, J.Q. 1997. Zeta potential and electroosmotic permeability of clay soils. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 34: 627-631.
19. Shapiro, A.P., and Probstein, R.F. 1993. Removal of contaminants from saturated clay by electroosmosis. Environmental Science & Technology, 27(2): 283-291.
20. Sparks, D.L. 1986. Soil physical chemistry. CRC Press, Boca Raton, Fla.
21. Vane, L.M., and Zang, G.M. 1997. Effect of aqueous phase properties on clay particle zeta potential and electro-osmotic permeability: implications for electro-kinetic soil remediation processes. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 55: 1-22.
22. West, L.J., and Stewart, D.L. 1995. Effect of zeta potential on soil electrokinesis. In Proceedings of Geoenvironment 2000, ASCE Special Publication 146. pp. 1535-1549.
23. Yang, G.C.C., and Lin, S. 1998. Removal of lead from a silt loam by electrokinetic remediation. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 58: 285-299.
24. Yukselen, Y. 2001. A study on the zeta potential of clay minerals in the presence of various chemical conditions. M.Sc. thesis, Department of Civil Engineering, Dokuz Eylül University, Izmir, Turkey.
25. Yukselen, Y., and Kaya, A. 2003. Zeta potential of kaolinite in the presence of alkali, alkaline earth and hydrolysable metal ions. Water, Air, and Soil Pollution, 145(1): 155-168.