The objective assessment of international collaboration between pathology laboratories

Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice

Volumn 12, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 1-7

  Holliman, R E ^a   Johnson, J D ^a   Adjei, O ^b  

^a ST GEORGE'S UNIVERSITY OF LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^b KWAME NKRUMAH UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (Ghana)

Author keywords

Assessment; Collaboration; International; Pathology

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; DEVELOPED COUNTRY; EDUCATION; INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION; LABORATORY; LABORATORY PERSONNEL; MANAGEMENT; MEDICAL ETHICS; MEDICAL RESEARCH; MORALITY; PATHOLOGY; PLANNING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITY CONTROL;

INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION; LABORATORIES; PATHOLOGY, CLINICAL; QUALITY ASSURANCE, HEALTH CARE;

EID: 32344434517     PISSN: 13561294     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2005.00580.x     Document Type: Article

References (10)

1. Champoux J.E. & Howard P.D. (1989) Job design and work context reactions among medical technologists. The Internet Journal of Allied Health Sciences and Practice 18 (20), 177-187.
2. Evaluation UK (2004) A guide to programme evaluation. [WWW document] URL http://www.evaluation.co.uk/library/how/progs
3. Johnson J.D. (2004) The effect of climate on job satisfaction and quality of service in pathology. MSc Thesis. City University, London.
4. National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion (2004) How to write SMART objectives. [WWW document] URL http://www.cdc.gov/ nccdphp/dmpa/physical/handbook/appendix4
5. Newman J.E. (1977) Development of a measure of perceived work environment. Academic Management Journal 20, 520-534.
6. Pitt S.J. & Sands R.L. (2002) Effect of staff attitudes on quality in clinical microbiology services. British Journal of Biomedical Science 59 (2), 69-75.
7. RAE (2001) Higher education & research opportunities in the United Kingdom. [WWW document] URL http://www.hero.ac.uk/rae/
8. Roud J. (2004) Microbiology in paradise. The Biomedical Scientist April, 371-373.
9. Tierney A.J. (1994) An analysis of nursing's performance in the 1992 assessment of research in British universities. Journal of Advanced Nursing 19, 593-602.
10. Williams G. (1998) Misleading, unscientific and unjust: the United Kingdom's research assessment exercise. British Medical Journal 316, 1079-1082.