Cancer detection and mammogram volume of radiologists in a population-based screening programme

Breast

Volumn 15, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 39-43

  Rickard, Mary ^a   Taylor, Richard ^a,b   Page, Andrew ^a   Estoesta, Jane ^a  

^a CUMBERLAND HOSPITAL   (Australia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SYDNEY   (Australia)

Author keywords

Breast cancer detection; Mammography; Reader volume

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BREAST CANCER; CANCER DIAGNOSIS; CANCER INCIDENCE; CANCER RISK; CONFIDENCE INTERVAL; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; FEMALE; HEALTH PROGRAM; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; MAMMOGRAPHY; MASS SCREENING; OBSERVER VARIATION; POISSON DISTRIBUTION; POPULATION RESEARCH; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RADIOLOGIST; UNITED KINGDOM;

EID: 32244447868     PISSN: 09609776     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.breast.2005.04.005     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. S.W. Duffy L. Tabar H.H. Chen M. Holmqvist M.F. Yen S. Abdsalah et al. The impact of organized mammography service screening on breast carcinoma mortality in seven Swedish counties Cancer 95 3 2002 458-469
2. K. Kerlikowske Efficacy of screening mammography among women aged 40 to 49 years and 50 to 69 years: Comparison of relative and absolute benefit J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr 22 1997 79-86
3. L. Nystrom I. Andersson N. Bjurstam J. Frisell B. Nordenskjold L.E. Rutqvist Long-term effects of mammography screening: Updated overview of the Swedish randomised trials Lancet 359 9310 2002 909-919
4. R. Taylor S. Morrell J. Estoesta A. Brassil Mammography screening and breast cancer mortality in New South Wales, Australia Cancer Causes Control 15 2004 543-550
5. K. Dickersin Breast screening in women aged 40-49 years: What next? Lancet 353 9168 1999 1896-1897
6. P.C. Gotzsche O. Olsen Is screening for breast cancer with mammography justifiable? Lancet 355 9198 2000 129-134
7. O. Olsen P.C. Gotzsche Cochrane review on screening for breast cancer with mammography Lancet 358 9290 2001 1340-1342
8. National Accreditation Committee. National Program for the Early Detection of Breast Cancer-National Accreditation Requirements. Canberra: Commonwealth Department of Human Services and Health; 1994.
9. National Quality Management Committee, BreastScreen Australia National Accreditation Standards: BreastScreen Australia Quality Improvement Program 2001 BreastScreen Australia Canberra
10. Department of Health and Human Services, Food and Drug Administration. Quality mammography standards; Final rule 21 CRF parts 16 & 900. Federal Register, 1997.
11. National Health Service Breast Screening Programme. Quality assurance guidelines for radiologists (Publication No. 15). Sheffield: National Health Service Breast Screening Programme; 1997.
12. L. Kan I.A. Olivotto L.J. Warren Burhenne E.A. Sickles A.J. Coldman Standardized abnormal interpretation and cancer detection ratios to assess reading volume and reader performance in a breast screening program Radiology 215 2 2000 563-567
13. P. Armitage G. Berry J.N.S. Matthews Statistical methods in medical research 4th ed. 2002 Blackwell Science Oxford
14. K. Jong D.P. Smith X.Q. Yu C. Goumas D. O'Connell B.K. Armstrong Remoteness and cancer incidence, mortality and survival in New South Wales 1992 to 1996 2002 The Cancer Council NSW Sydney
15. L. Esserman H. Cowley C. Eberle A. Kirkpatrick S. Chang K. Berbaum et al. Improving the accuracy of mammography: volume and outcome relationships [see comment] J Natl Cancer Inst 94 5 2002 369-375
16. C.A. Beam E.F. Conant E.A. Sickles Association of volume and volume-independent factors with accuracy in screening mammogram interpretation [see comment] J Natl Cancer Inst 95 4 2003 282-290