On the crisis in Canadian sociology: Comment on McLaughlin

Canadian Journal of Sociology

Volumn 30, Issue 4, 2005, Pages 491-502

  Baer, Doug ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 32244443685     PISSN: 03186431     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1353/cjs.2006.0002     Document Type: Review

References (26)

1. Brady, David 2004 "Why Public Sociology May Fail." Social Forces 82:1629-1638.
2. Brym, Robert 2002 "An Introduction to the Upper Thirteen." The American Sociologist 33:5-11.
3. 2003a "The Decline of the Canadian Sociology and Anthropology Association." Canadian Journal of Sociology 28:411-416.
4. 2003b "Le déclin de 1' Association Cancadienne de Sociologie et d'anthropologie." Les cahiers de rechrche sociologique 39:227-235.
5. Burawoy, Michael 2004 "Public Sociologies: Contradictions, Dilemmas and Possibilities." Social Forces 82:1603-1618.
6. 2005 "For Public Sociology." American Sociological Review 70:4-28.
7. Bums, Val 2004 "The Academic Caste System: Prestige, Hierarchies in PhD Exchange Networks." American Sociological Review 69:239-264.
8. CFHSS 2005 "Renewing Scholarly Associations: Knowledge Networks for the Next Generation." Canadian Federation for the Humanities and Social Sciences, Ottawa.
9. Cormier, Jeffrey 2002 "Nationalism, Activism and the Canadian Sociology and Anthropology Community, 1967-1985." American Sociologist.
10. Curtis, Brace and Lorna Weir 2002 "The Succession Question in English Canadian Sociology." Society/Societé 26:3-12.
11. Davies, Philip 2004 "Sociology and policy science: just in time?" British Journal of Sociology 55:447-550.
12. Gartrell, C. David and John Gartrell 1996 "Positivism in Sociological Practice: 1967-1990." Canadian Review of Sociology and Anthropology 33:143-159.
13. Hammersley, Martyn 2004 "A new political arithmetic to make sociology useful? Comments on a debate." British Journal of Sociology 55:439-446.
14. Heilbron, Julian 2004 "A Regime of Disciplines: Toward a Historical Sociology of Disciplinary Knowledge." in The Dialogical Turn: New Roles for Sociology in the Postdisciplinary Age, edited by C. Carmac and H. Joas. Lanham MD: Rowmand and Littlefield.
15. House, Ernest 1994 "Integrating the Quantitative and Qualitative." Pp. 12-22 in The Qualitative-Quantitative Debate, edited by C. S. Reichardt and S. F. Rallis. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
16. Huber, Joan 2001 "Institutional Perspectives on Sociology." in What's Wrong with Sociology, edited by S. Cole. New Brunswick: Transaction.
17. Johnson, Paul 2004 "Making social science useful." British Journal of Sociology 55:23-30.
18. Lauder, Hugh, Phillip Brown, and A.H. Halsey 2004 "Sociology and political arithmetic: some principles of a new policy science." British Journal of Sociology 55:3-22.
19. May, Carl 2005 "Methodological Pluralism, British Sociology and the Evidence-based State: A Reply to Payne et al." Sociology 39:519-528.
20. Nielson, Francois 2004 "The Vacant "We": Remarks on Public Sociology" Social Forces 82:1619-1627.
21. O'Malley, Pat and Alan Hunt 2003 "Does Sociology Need to Be Disciplined? A Response to Curtis and Weir." Society/Societé 27:7-12.
22. Payne, Geoff, Malcolm Williams, and Suzanne Chamberlain 2004 "Methodological Pluralism in British Sociology." Sociology 38:153-163.
23. 2005 "Methodological Pluralism, British Sociology and the Evidence-based State: A Reply to May." Sociology 39:529-533.
24. Simpson, Ida and Richard Simpson 2001 "The Transformation of the American Sociological Association." in What's Wrong with Sociology? edited by S. Cole. New Brunswick: Transaction.
25. Tittle, Charles 2004 "The Arrogance of Public Sociology." Social Forces 82: 1639-1643.
26. Warren, Jean-Phillipe 2005 "Sociologizing Alone: The Route of Professional Associations of Sociology?" Unpublished MS. Dept. of Sociology, Concordia University.