Double-ink dip-pen nanolithography studies elucidate molecular transport

Journal of the American Chemical Society

Volumn 128, Issue 5, 2006, Pages 1648-1653

  Hampton, Jennifer R ^a,b   Dameron, Arrelaine A ^a   Weiss, Paul S ^a  

^a PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b WASHINGTON AND JEFFERSON COLLEGE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

GOLD; HYDROPHOBICITY; INK; NANOTECHNOLOGY; ORGANIC ACIDS; SUBSTRATES;

1-OCTADECANETHIOL (ODT); 16-MERCAPTOHEXADECANOIC ACID (MHDA); DOUBLE-INK DIP-PEN NANOLITHOGRAPHY; MOLECULAR TRANSPORT;

LITHOGRAPHY;

1 OCTADECANETHIOL; 16 MERCAPTOHEXADECANOIC ACID; GOLD; INK; PALMITIC ACID DERIVATIVE; THIOL DERIVATIVE; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ADSORPTION; ARTICLE; ATOMIC FORCE MICROSCOPY; COMPUTER PROGRAM; DOUBLE INK DIP PEN NANOLITHOGRAPHY; GEOMETRY; HUMIDITY; HYDROPHOBICITY; PRINTING; WRITING;

GOLD; INK; LITHOGRAPHY; ORGANIC ACIDS; SUBSTRATES; WATER REPELLENCE;

EID: 32244443258     PISSN: 00027863     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/ja056369b     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Jaschke, M.; Butt, H. J. Langmuir 1995, 11, 1061.
2. Ginger, D. S.; Zhang, H.; Mirkin, C. A. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2004, 43, 30.
3. Piner, R. D.; Zhu, J.; Xu, F.; Hong, S. H.; Mirkin, C. A. Science 1999, 283, 661.
4. Weinberger, D. A.; Hong, S. G.; Mirkin, C. A.; Wessels, B. W.; Higgins, T. B. Adv. Mater. 2000, 12, 1600.
5. Zhang, H.; Chung, S. W.; Mirkin, C. A. Nano Lett. 2003, 3, 43.
6. Zhang, H.; Lee, K. B.; Li, Z.; Mirkin, C. A. Nanotechnology 2003, 14, 1113.
7. Cheung, C. L.; Camarero, J. A.; Woods, B. W.; Lin, T. W.; Johnson, J. E.; De Yoreo, J. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 6848.
8. Lee, K. B.; Park, S. J.; Mirkin, C. A.; Smith, J. C.; Mrksich, M. Science 2002, 295, 1702.
9. Smith, J. C.; Lee, K. B.; Wang, Q.; Finn, M. G.; Johnson, J. E.; Mrksich, M.; Mirkin, C. A. Nano Lett. 2003, 3, 883.
10. Peterson, E. J.; Weeks, B. L.; De Yoreo, J. J.; Schwartz, P. V. J. Phys. Chem. B 2004, 108, 15206.
11. Rozhok, S.; Piner, R.; Mirkin, C. A. J. Phys. Chem. B 2003, 107, 751.
12. Schwartz, P. V. Langmuir 2002, 18, 4041.
13. Sheehan, P. E.; Whitman, L. J. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2002, 88, 156104.
14. Weeks, B. L.; Noy, A.; Miller, A. E.; De Yoreo, J. J. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2002, 88, 255505.
15. Salaita, K.; Amarnath, A.; Maspoch, D.; Higgins, T. B.; Mirkin, C. A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 11283.
16. Ron, H.; Rubinstein, I. Langmuir 1994, 10, 4556.
17. NanoInk, personal communication.
18. Bain, C. D.; Troughton, E. B.; Tao, Y. T.; Evall, J.; Whitesides, G. M.; Nuzzo, R. G. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1989, 111, 321.
19. Laibinis, P. E.; Whitesides, G. M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1992, 114, 1990.
20. The role of the water meniscus in ink transport during DPN, particularly when patterning at low relative humidity, is controversial. However, at the relative humidity of our experiments (21%), there is no dispute that a meniscus forms.
21. Handbook of Physical Properties of Organic Chemicals; Howard, P. H., Meylan, W. M., Eds.; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, 1997.
22. Meylan, W. M.; Howard, P. H.; Boethling, R. S. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 1996, 15, 100.
23. Southall, N. T.; Dill, K. A.; Haymet, A. D. J. J. Phys. Chem. B 2002, 106, 521.
24. Tanford, C. J. Phys. Chem. 1974, 78, 2469.
25. Tanford, C. The Hydrophobic Effect: Formation of Micelles and Biological Membranes, 2nd ed.; John Wiley and Sons: New York, 1980.