Burrow fractal dimension and foraging success in subterranean rodents: A simulation

Behavioral Ecology

Volumn 17, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 188-195

  Le Comber, S C ^a   Seabloom, E W ^b   Romanach S S ^c  

^a QUEEN MARY UNIVERSITY OF LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^b OREGON STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c Save Valley Conservancy   (Zimbabwe)

Author keywords

Burrow architecture; Computer model; Food distribution; Food patchiness; Shape

Indexed keywords

BURROW; FORAGING BEHAVIOR; FORAGING EFFICIENCY; FRACTAL ANALYSIS; RODENT; SUBTERRANEAN ENVIRONMENT;

ANIMALIA; RODENTIA;

EID: 32244439744     PISSN: 10452249     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/beheco/arj011     Document Type: Article

References (54)

1. Andersen DC, 1988. Tunnel construction methods and foraging path of a fossorial herbivore, Geomys bursarius. J Mammal 69:565-582.
2. Andersen DC, 1990. Search paths of a fossorial herbivore, Geomys bursarius, foraging in structurally complex plant communities. J Mammal 71:177-187.
3. Andersen DC, 1996. A spatially-explicit model of search path and soil disturbance by a fossorial herbivore. Ecol Model 89:99-108.
4. Bascompte J, Vila C, 1997. Fractals and search paths in mammals. Landsc Ecol 12:213-221.
5. Benedix JH Jr, 1993. Area-restricted search by the plains pocket gopher (Geomys bursarius) in tallgrass prairie habitat. Behav Ecol 4:318-324.
6. Bennett NC, 1988. The trend towards sociality in three species of southern African mole-rats (Bathyergidae): causes and consequences (PhD dissertation). South Africa: University of Cape Town.
7. Bennett NC, Faulkes CG, 2000. African mole-rats: ecology and eusociality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
8. Biesinger Z, Haefner JW, 2005. Proximate cues for predator searching: a quantitative analysis of hunger and encounter rate in the ladybird beetle, Coccinella septempunctata. Anim Behav 69:235-244.
9. Block A, von Bloh W, Schnellhuber HJ, 1990. Efficient box-counting determination of generalized fractal dimension. Phys Rev A 42:1869-1874.
10. Brett RA, 1986. The ecology and behaviour of the naked mole-rat Heterocephalus glaber (Rüppell) (Rodentia: Bathyergidae) (PhD dissertation). London: University of London.
11. Brett RA, 1991. The ecology of naked mole-rat colonies: burrowing, food and limiting factors. In: The biology of the naked mole-rat (Sherman PW, Jarvis JUM, Alexander RD, eds). Princeton: Princeton University Press; 137-184.
12. Cuddington K, Yodzis P, 2002. Predator-prey dynamics and movement in fractal environments. Am Nat 160:119-134.
13. Despland E, 2003. Fractal index captures the role of vegetation clumping in locust swarming. Funct Ecol 17:315-322.
14. Edwards MA, Forbes GJ, Bowman J, 2001. Fractal dimension of ermine, Mustela erminea (Carnivora: Mustelidae), movement patterns as an indicator of resource use. Mammalia 65:220-225.
15. Etzenhouser MJ, Owens MK, Spalinger DE, Murden SB, 1998. Foraging behavior of browsing ruminants in a heterogeneous landscape. Landsc Ecol 13:55-64.
16. Faulkes CG, Bennett NC, in press. African mole-rats: behavioral and ecological diversity. In: Rodent societies: an ecological and evolutionary perspective (Wolff J, Sherman PW, eds). Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
17. Faulkes CG, Bennett NC, Bruford MW, O'Brien HP, Aguilar GH, Jarvis JUM, 1997. Ecological constraints drive social evolution in the African mole-rats. Proc R Soc Lond B 264:1619-1627.
18. Fritz H, Said S, Weimerskirch H, 2003. Scale-dependent hierarchical adjustments of movement patterns in a long-range foraging seabird. Proc R Soc Lond B 270:1143-1148.
19. Heth G, Todrank J, Begall S, Koch R, Zilbiger Y, Nevo E, Braude SH, Burda H, 2002. Odours underground: subterranean rodents may not forgage "blindly." Behav Ecol Sociobiol 52:53-58.
20. Hobbs RJ, Atkins L, 1988. Effects of disturbance and nutrient addition on native and introduced annuals in plant communities in the western Australia wheatbelt. Aust J Ecol 13:171-179.
21. Huettmann F, 2004. Computing foraging paths for shore-birds using fractal dimensions and pecking success from footprint surveys on mudflats: an application for red-necked stints in the Moroshechnaya river estuary, Kamchatka-Russian far east. Computational science and its applications. In: ICCSA 2004: International Conference, Assisi, Italy, 14-17 May, 2004, Proceedings, Part II (Lagana A, Gavrilova ML, Kumar V, Mun Y, Tan CJK, Gervasi O, eds). Berlin: Springer-Verlag; 1117-1128.
22. Huntly N, Inouye R, 1988. Pocket gophers in ecosystems: patterns and mechanisms. Bioscience 38:786-793.
23. Inouye RS, Huntly N, Tilman D, Tester JR, 1987. Pocket gophers (Geomys bursarius), vegetation and soil nitrogen along a successional sere in east central Minnesota. Oecologia 72:178-184.
24. Jarvis JUM, Bennett NC, 1990. The evolutionary history, population biology and social structure of African mole-rats: family Bathyergidae. In: Evolution of subterranean mammals at organismal and molecular levels (Nevo E, Reig OA, eds). New York: Wiley-Liss; 97-128.
25. Jarvis JUM, Bennett NC, Spinks AC, 1998. Food availability and foraging by wild colonies of Damaraland mole-rats (Cryptomys damarensis): implications for sociality. Oecologia 113:290-298.
26. Jarvis JUM, Sale JB, 1971. Burrowing and burrow patterns of East African mole-rats Tacyoryctes, Heliophobius and Heterocephalus. J Zool 163:451-479.
27. Kenkel NC, Walker DJ, 1996. Fractals in the biological sciences. Coenoses 11:77-100.
28. Laidre KL, Heide-Jorgensen MP, Logsdon ML, Hobbs RC, Dietz R, VanBlaricom GR, 2004. Fractal analysis of narwhal space use patterns. Zoology 107:3-11.
29. Le Comber SC, Spinks AC, Bennett NC, Jarvis JUM, Faulkes CG, 2002. Fractal dimension of African mole-rat burrows. Can J Zool 80:436-441.
30. Longley PA, Batty B, 1989. On the fractal measurement of geographical boundaries. Geogr Anal 21:47-67.
31. Lovejoy S, Schertzer D, Ladoy P, 1986. Fractal characterization of inhomogenous geophysical measuring networks. Nature 319:43-44.
32. Malherbe GP, Bennett NC, Schoeman AS, 2003. Foraging in the subterranean highveld mole-rat, Cryptomys hottentotus pretoriae: an investigation into mass-dependent geophyte use and foraging patterns. J Zool 260:219-225.
33. Mathematica 5.0. 2003. Illinois: Wolfram Research, Inc.
34. Mouillot D, Viale D, 2001. Satellite tracking of a fin whale (Balaenoptera physalus) in the north-western Mediterranean Sea and fractal analysis of its trajectory. Hydrobiologia 452:163-171.
35. Normant F, Tricot C, 1991. Method for evaluating the fractal dimension of curves using convex hulls. Phys Rev A 43:6518-6525.
36. Normant F, Tricot C, 1993. Fractal simplification of lines using convex hulls. Geogr Anal 25:118-129.
37. Peart DR, 1989. Species interactions in a successional grassland III. Effects of canopy gaps, gopher mounds and grazing on colonization. J Ecol 77:267-289.
38. Phillips ML, Clark WR, Nusser SM, Sovada MA, Greenwood RJ, 2004. Analysis of predator movement in prairie landscapes with contrasting grassland composition. J Mammal 85:187-195.
39. Pruess SA, 1995. Some remarks on the numerical estimation of fractal dimension. In: Fractals in the earth sciences (Barton CC, La Pointe PR, eds). New York: Plenum Press; 65-75.
40. Puche H, Su N, 2001. Application of fractal analysis for tunnel systems of subterranean termites (Isoptera: Rhinotermitidae) under laboratory conditions. Environ Entomol 30:545-549.
41. Pyke GH, 1984. Optimal foraging theory: a critical review. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 15:523-575.
42. Reichman OJ, Jarvis JUM, 1989. The influence of three sympatric species of fossorial mole-rats (Bathyergidae) on vegetation. J Mammal 70:763-771.
43. Reichman OJ, Whitham TG, Ruffner GA, 1982 Adaptive geometry of burrow spacing in two pocket gopher populations. Ecology 63:687-695.
44. Romañach SS, Le Comber SC, 2004. Measures of pocket gopher (Thomomys bottae) burrow geometry: correlates of fractal dimension. J Zool 262:399-403.
45. Romañach SS, Reichman OJ, Rogers WE, Cameron GN, 2005. Effects of species, gender, age and habitat on pocket gopher foraging tunnel geometry. J Mammal 86:750-756.
46. Seabloom EW, Reichman OJ, 2001. Simulation models of the interactions between herbivore foraging strategies, social behavior, and plant community dynamics. Am Nat 157:76-96.
47. Spinks AC, Plaganyi ÉE, 1999. Reduced starvation risks and habitat constraints promote cooperation in the common mole-rat, Cryptomys hottentotus hottentotus: a computer-simulated foraging model. Oikos 85:435-444.
48. Steuter AA, Steinauer EM, Hill GL, Bowers PA, Tieszen LL, 1995. Distribution and diet of bison and pocket gophers in a sandhills prairie. Ecol Appl 5:756.
49. Sumbera R, Burda H, Chitaukali WN, Kubovaa J, 2003. Silvery mole-rats (Heliophobious argenteocinereus, Bathyergidae) change their burrow architecture seasonally. Naturwissenschaften 90:370-373.
50. Taylor CC, Taylor SJ, 1991. Estimating the dimension of a fractal. J R Stat Soc B 53:353-364.
51. Tilman D, 1983. Plant succession and gopher disturbance along an experimental gradient. Oecologia 60:285-292.
52. Vleck D, 1979. The energy cost of burrowing by the pocket gopher Thomomys bottae. Physiol Zool 82:122-136.
53. Vleck D, 1981. Burrow structure and foraging costs in the fossorial rodent, Thomomys bottae. Oecologia 49:391-396.
54. Wasley G, 1995. The effects of productivity on the mound production and burrow geometry of the plains pocket gopher (Geomys bursarius), in an old-field in east-central Minnesota (MSc dissertation). Pocatello: Idaho State University.