Recovery management agreements offer alternative to continuing ESA listings

Fisheries

Volumn 31, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 35-36

  Goble, Dale D ^a   Scott, J Michael ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF IDAHO   (United States)

^b U S GEOLOGICAL SURVEY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 32244433771     PISSN: 03632415     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Note

References (9)

1. Abbitt, R. J. F., and J. M. Scott. 2001. Examining differences between recovered and declining endangered species. Conservation Biology 15:1274-84.
2. Goble, D. D., J. M. Scott, and F. W. Davis. 2005. The Endangered Species Act at thirty: renewing the conservation promise. Island Press, Covelo, California.
3. NOAA (National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration). 2003. Biennial report to Congress on the recovery program for threatened and endangered species. NOAA, Washington, DC.
4. Schwarte, M. W. 1999. Choosing the appropriate scale of reserves for conservation. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematic 30:83-108.
5. Scott, J. M., D. D. Goble, and F. W. Davis. In press. The Endangered Species Act at thirty: Conserving biodiversity in human-dominated landscapes. Island Press, Covelo, California.
6. Scott J. M., D. D. Goble, J. A. Wiens, D. S. Wilcove, M. Bean, and T. Male. 2005. Recovery of imperiled species under the Endangered Species Act: the need for a new approach. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 3:383-89.
7. U.S. Congress. 2005. House Committee on Resources, Press Release: Pombo releases oversight report on ESA implementation (17 May). Available at: http://kwua.org./news/PRpomboESA051 705.htm (visited 3 September 2005).
8. USFWS (U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service). 2004. Recovery report to Congress: fiscal years 2001-2002. USFWS, Washington, DC.
9. Wilcove, D. S. 1998. Quantifying threats to imperiled species in the United States. BioScience 48:607-15.