The Montreal Protocol's multilateral fund and sustainable development

Ecological Economics

Volumn 56, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 241-255

  Luken, Ralph ^a   Grof, Tamas ^a  

^a UNITED NATIONS INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT ORGANIZATION   (Austria)

Author keywords

Global; Global Environment Facility; Montreal Protocol; Multilateral environmental agreements; Sustainable development and technology transfer

Indexed keywords

MONTREAL PROTOCOL; SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT; TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER;

EID: 32144462682     PISSN: 09218009     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2004.04.013     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Anderson, S., Sarma, K., 2002. Protecting the Ozone Layer: The United Nations History, London and Sterling VA: Earthscan and UNEP.
2. R. Benedick Ozone Diplomacy: New Directions in Safeguarding the Planet 1998 Harvard University Press Cambridge MA
3. F. Biermann, and U. Simonis The multilateral ozone fund: a case study on institutional learning International Journal of Social Economics 26 1999 239 273
4. E. Brown, H. Weiss, and K. Jacobson Getting countries to comply with international environmental agreements Environment 41 1999 16 32
5. Carvalho, S., 2004. Personal communication. UNDP.
6. Climate Action Network-Europe, 2002. Ozone and climate at a crossroads: the other double phase-out (www.climnet.org, [08.10.04]).
7. COWAconsult, 1995. Study on the financial mechanism of the Montreal Protocol, prepared for the UNEP Ozone Secretariat, Nairobi, Kenya.
8. H. French Learning from the ozone experience L. Brown C. Flavin H. French In State of the World 1997 W.W. Norton & Company New York
9. R. Gee Technology transfer effectiveness in university-industry co-operative research International Journal of Technology Management 8 1993 652 658
10. Global Environment Facility Operational Strategy of the Global Environment Facility 2002 Global Environment Facility Washington (www.gef.web.org, [08.10.04])
11. Global Environment Facility, 2004. Templates and Guidelines (www. gef, [10.01.05]).
12. K. Gray Multilateral environmental agreements in Africa: efforts and problems in implementation International Environmental Agreement: Politics, Law and the Environment 3 2003 97 135
13. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, 2001. Climate change 2001: the scientific basis, contribution of Working Group I to the Third Assessment (www.grida.no/ipcc_tar/, [08.10.04]).
14. S. Oberthuer, S. Pfahl, and J. Schemmel Implementing the ODS Phase Out in Developing Countries: Lessons Learned from EU Experience 2000 GTZ/Ecologic www. gtz.de/proklima/English/publications, [07-10-04].
15. S. Obertuer Linkages between the Montreal and Kyoto Protocols: enhancing synergies between protecting the ozone layer and the global climate International Environmental Agreement: Politics, Law and the Environment 1 2001 357 377
16. O'Connor, D., 1991. Policy and entrepreneurial responses to the Montreal Protocol: some evidence from the dynamic Asian economies. Technical paper No. 51, OECD Development Centre, Paris, OECD.
17. E. Parson Protecting the Ozone Layer: Science and Strategy 2003 Oxford University Press Oxford, UK
18. UNEP, 1995. 1994 Report of the Methyl Bromide Technical Options Committee, Seventh Session of the Meeting of Parties (www.unep.org/ozone, [08.10.05]).
19. UNEP The Kyoto Protocol to the Convention on Climate Change 1998 Text Available from the Climate Change Secretariat Bonn Germany
20. UNEP, 2003. Report of the Executive Committee to the fifteenth meeting of the parties, UNEP/Ozl.Pro.15.8.
21. UNEP/MLF, 1999. Report on the implementation of the 1999 work programme for monitoring and evaluation, includes evaluation of refrigeration projects, UNEP/Ozl.Pro/ExCom/29/5/Add.1 (not available on-line; they must be requested from the Evaluation Unit, MLF).
22. UNEP/MLF, 2000. Revised strategy and guidelines for projects in the methyl bromide sector, UNEP/Pzl.Pro/ExCom/32/44/Annex 14.
23. UNEP/MLF, 2001a. Final report on the evaluation of foam projects, UNEP/Ozl.Pro/ExCom/33/6 (Evaluations are not available on-line; they must be requested from the Evaluation Unit, Executive Committee, MLF).
24. UNEP/MLF, 2001b. Evaluation of completed compressor projects in China', UNEP/Ozl.Pro/ExCom/34/17 (Evaluations are not available on-line; they must be requested from the Evaluation Unit, Executive Committee, MLF).
25. UNEP/MLF, 2001c. Final report on the evaluation of solvent projects, UNEP/Ozl.Pro/ExCom/35/12 (Evaluations are not available on-line; they must be requested from the Evaluation Unit, Executive Committee, MLF).
26. UNEP/MLF, 2002. Final report on the evaluation of aerosol projects, UNEP/Ozl.Pro/ExCom/38/5 (Evaluations are not available on-line for external parties; they must be requested from the Evaluation Unit, Executive Committee, MLF).
27. UNEP/MLF, 2004a. Progress report 2003 for UNDP, UNEP/Ozl.Pro/ExCom/43/12.
28. UNEP/MLF, 2004b. Progress report 2003 for UNEP, UNEP/Ozl.Pro/ExCom/43/13.
29. UNEP/MLF, 2004c. Progress report 2003 for UNIDO, UNEP/Ozl.Pro/ExCom/43/ 14.
30. UNEP/MLF, 2004d. Progress report 2003 for World Bank, UNEP/Ozl.Pro/ExCom/43/15.
31. UNEP/MLF, 2004e. 2003 Accounts, UNEP/Ozl.Pro/ExCom/43/53.
32. UNEP/MLF, 2004f. Project implementation delays, forty-third meeting of the Executive Committee, UNEP/OzL.Pro/ExCom/43/17 (www.unmfs.org ).
33. UNEP/MLF, 2004g. Policies, procedures, guidelines and criteria, policy document 43 (www.mfs.org, [10.01.05]).
34. UNEP Ozone Secretariat, 2004. Information provided by the parties in accordance with Article 7 of the Montreal Protocol on substances that deplete the ozone layer. Implementation Committee under the non-compliance procedure for the Montreal Protocol, Geneva 17-19 July 2003, UNEP/OzL.Pro/ImpCom/32/3.
35. UN Framework Convention on Climate Change, 1998. Review of the commitments and other provisions of the convention, FCCC/CP/1998/ INF. 9 (www.unfccc.int/resources, [08.10.04]).
36. UNIDO, 1998. Sustainable industrial development: UNIDO's Definition, Vienna, Austria (www.unido.org/wssd/publications, [08.10.04]).
37. UNIDO, 2002. Ozone friendly industrial development: 10 years of UNIDO in the Montreal Protocol, Vienna, Austria, V.02-55504 (www.unido.org, [08.10.04]).
38. UNIDO, 2003. Ozone friendly industrial development: impact and lessons learned, six volumes-overview, refrigeration and alternative technologies for domestic appliances, plastic foams, solvents (including process agents) and aerosols, fumigants and refrigeration management plans. Vienna. Austria, V.03.89091-6.
39. UNIDO, 2004. Montreal Protocol Project Management database. Access available upon request.
40. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 1996. Class I ozone-depleting substances (www.epa.gov/ozone/ods, [07-10-04]).
41. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 2000. Global warming site-international emissions (www.epa.gov/globalwarming, [07-10-04]).
42. World Bank World Bank's Approach to Global Programs: Phase 2 Report, Case Study: The Multilateral Fund for the Implementation of the Montreal Protocol 2004 World Bank Washington
43. J. Zhao, and L. Ortolano Implementing the Montreal Protocol in China: use of cleaner technology in two industrial sectors Environmental Impact Assessment Review 19 1999 499 519