Towards machine ethics

AAAI Workshop - Technical Report

Volumn WS-04-02, Issue , 2004, Pages 53-59

  Anderson, Michael ^a   Anderson, Susan Leigh ^b   Armen, Chris ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HARTFORD   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT   (United States)

^c TRINITY COLLEGE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ETHICAL RAMIFICATIONS; MACHINE AUTONOMY; MACHINE BEHAVIOR; MACHINE ETHICS;

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; COMPUTER SCIENCE; INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY;

LEARNING SYSTEMS;

EID: 32144449766     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (10)

1. Anderson, S. L. 2000. We Are Our Values. In Questioning Matters, an Introduction to Philosophical Inquiry, 606-8 edited by D. Kolak, Mayfield Publishing Company, Mountain View, California.
2. Bentham, J. 1799. An Introduction to the Principles and Morals of Legislation, Oxford.
3. Barquin, R. C. 1992. In Pursuit of a "Ten Commandments for Computer Ethics". Computer Ethics Institute, (http://www.brook.edu/its/cei/default. htm).
4. Beauchamp, T. L. and Childress, J. F. 1979. Principles of Biomedical Ethics, Oxford University Press.
5. Frankena, W. 1993. To Be or Do, That is the Question. In Doing and Being, Selected Readings in Moral Philosophy, 208, edited by J. G. Haber, Macmillan, New York.
6. Heckerman, D. E., Horvitz, E. J., and Nathwani, B. N. 1992. Toward Normative Expert Systems. Methods of Information in Medicine, 31:90-105.
7. Mill, J. S. 1974. Utilitarianism, in Utilitarianism and Other Writings, 253, edited by M. Warnock, New American Library, New York.
8. Mitchell, T. 1997. Machine Learning, McGraw Hill.
9. Rawls, J. 1951. Outline for a Decision Procedure for Ethics. Philosophical Review, 60.
10. Ross, W. D. 1930. The Right and the Good, Clarendon Press, Oxford.