The development of metacognition in primary school learning environments

School Effectiveness and School Improvement

Volumn 16, Issue 2, 2005, Pages 179-196

  De Jager, Bernadet ^a   Jansen, Margo ^a   Reezigt, Gerry ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GRONINGEN   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 32144434970     PISSN: 09243453     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/09243450500114181     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Bereiter, C., & Scardamalia, M. (1989). Intentional learning as a goal of instruction. In L. B. Resnick (Ed.), Knowing, learning and instruction (pp. 361-393). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
2. Biemans H. J. A., Deel, O. R., & Simons, P. R. J. (2001). Differences between successful and less successful students while working with the CONTACT-2 strategy. Learning and Instruction, 11(4/5), 265-282.
3. Boekaerts, M., & Simons, P. R. J. (1993). Leren en instructie, psychologie van de leerling en leerproces [Learning and instruction, psychology of the pupil and the learning process]. Assen, The Netherlands: Dekker & Van de Vegt.
4. Bolhuis, S. M. (2000). Naar zelfstandig leren: Wat doen en denken docenten? [Towards independent learning: what do teachers do and think?] Apeldoorn, The Netherlands: Garant.
5. Brand-Gruwel S. (1995). Onderwijs in tekstbegrip: Een onderzoek naar het effect van strategisch lees- en luisteronderwijs bij zwakke lezers [Instruction in text comprehension: A study into the effects of strategic reading and listening instruction for weak readers]. Ubbergen, The Netherlands: Uitgeverij Tandem Felix.
6. Davidson, J. E., Deuser, R., & Sternberg, R. J. (1995). The role of metacognition in problem solving. In J. Metcalfe & A. P. Shimamura (Eds.), Metacognition: Knowing about knowing (pp. 207-227). Cambridge, MA: MIT.
7. Davidson, J. E., & Sternberg, R. J. (1998). Smart problem solving: How metacognition helps. In D. J. Hacker, J. Dunlosky, & A. C. Graesser (Eds.), Metacognition in educational theory and practice (pp. 47-69). London: Lawrence Erlbaum.
8. De Corte, E. (2000). Marrying theory building and the improvement of school practice: A permanent challenge for instructional psychology. Learning and Instruction, 10, 249-266.
9. De Jager, B. (2002). Teaching reading comprehension. The effects of direct instruction and cognitive apprenticeship on comprehension skills and metacognition. Groningen, The Netherlands: GION.
10. De Jong, F. P. C. M. (1992). Zelfstandig leren: Regulatie van het leerproces en het leren reguleren: Een procesbenadering [Independent learning: Regulation of the learning process and learning to regulate: A process approach]. Tilburg, The Netherlands: KUB.
11. Desoete, A., Roeyers, H., Buysse, A., & De Clercq, A. (2002). Dynamic assessment of metacognitive skills in young children with mathematics-learning disabilities. In G. M. van de Aalsvoort, W. C. M. Resing, & A. J. J. M. Ruijssenaars (Eds.), Learning potential assessment and cognitive training: Actual research and perspectives in theory building and methodology (Vol. 7, pp. 307-333). Oxford: Elsevier.
12. Dominowski, R. L. (1998). Verbalization and problem solving. In D. J. Hacker, J. Dunlosky, & A. C. Graesser (Eds.), Metacognition in educational theory and practice (pp. 25-47). London: Lawrence Erlbaum.
13. Ericsson, K. A, & Simon, H. A. (1993). Protocol analysis: Verbal reports as data. Cambridge, MA: MIT.
14. Glas, C. A. W., & Verhelst, N. D. (1995). Testing the Rasch model. In G. H. Fischer & I. W. Molenaar (Eds.), Rasch models: Foundations, recent developments and applications (pp. 69-96). New York: Springer-Verlag.
15. Hoogendijk, W., & Wolfgram, P. (1995). KEA, halverwege: Projectverslag schooljaar 1994-1995 [KEA, halfway: project report school year 1994-1995]. Rotterdam, The Netherlands: CED.
16. Klatter, E. B. (1996). Studievaardigheden in de brugklas. Een vergelijking tussen algemene en specifieke verwerkingsstijlen van brugklasleerlingen. Pedagogische Studiën, 73(4), 303-316.
17. Kluvers, K., & Simons, P. R. J. (1992). Zelfregulatievaardigheden en COO: Tussenrapporage [Selfregulation skills and computer-assisted education: interim report]. Nijmegen, The Netherlands: KU Nijmegen.
18. Laros, J. A., & Tellegen, P. J. (1991). Construction and validation of the SON-R 51/2-17, The Snijders-Oomen non-verbal intelligence test. Groningen, The Netherlands: Wolters-Noordhoff.
19. Mayer, R. E. (2001). Changing conceptions of learning: A century of progress in the scientific study of education. In L. Corno (Ed.), Education across a century: The centennial volume (pp. 34-76). Chicago: University of Chicago.
20. Meijer, J., Elshout-Mohr, M. E., & Van Hout-Wolters, B. H. A. M. (2001). An instrument for the assessment of cross curricular skills. Educational Research and Evaluation, 7, 79-108.
21. Minnaert, A., & Janssen, P. J. (1999). The additive effect of regulatory activities on top of intelligence in relation to academic performance in higher education. Learning and Instruction, 9(1), 77-91.
22. Muijs, D., & Reynolds, D. (2001). Effective teaching: Evidence and practice. Gateshead: Athenaeum Press.
23. Pintrich, P. R., & De Groot, E. V. (1990). Motivational and self-regulated learning components of classroom academic performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82(1), 33-40.
24. Pressley, M., & Afflerbach, P. (1995). Verbal protocols of reading: The nature of constructively responsive reading. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
25. Pressley, M., & McCormick, C. B. (1995). Cognition, teaching, and assessment. New York: Longman.
26. Resnick, L. B. (1989). Introduction. In L. B. Resnick (Ed.), Knowing, learning and instruction (pp. 1-25). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
27. Roelofs, E., & Visser, J. (2001). Leeromgevingen volgens ouders en leraren: Voorkeuren en realisatie [Learning environments according to parents and teachers: Preferences and realisation]. Pedagogische Studiën, 78, 151-168.
28. Rosenshine, B., & Meister, C. (1994). Reciprocal teaching: A review of the research. Review of Educational Research, 64(2), 201-243.
29. Schoenfeld, A. H. (2001). Mathematics education in the twentieth century. In L. Corno (Ed.), Education across a century: The centennial volume (pp. 239-279). Chicago: University of Chicago.
30. Simons, P. R. J. (2000). Review Studie leren en instructie [Review study learning and instruction]. Nijmegen, The Netherlands: University of Nijmegen.
31. Sliepen, S. E., & Reitsma, P. (1993). Training van lom-leerkrachten in directe instructie van begrijpend leesstrategieën [Training of teachers in special education in direct instruction in comprehension skills]. Pedagogische Studiën, 70, 420-444.
32. Van Hout-Wolters, B. (2000). Assessing active self-directed learning. In R. J. Simons, J. van der Linden, & T. Duffy (Eds.), New learning (pp. 83-100). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
33. Van Someren, M. W., Barnard, Y. F., & Sandberg, J. A. C. (1994). The thinking aloud method: A practical guide to modelling cognitve processes. London: Academic Press.
34. Veenman, S. A. M. (1992). Effectieve instructie volgens het directe instructiemodel [Effective instruction based on the direct instruction model]. Pedagogische Studieën, 69, 242-269.
35. Veenman, S. A. M., Leenders, Y., Meyer, P., & Sanders, M. (1993). Leren lesgeven met het directe instructiemodel [Learning to teach with the direct instruction model]. Pedagogische Studiën, 70, 2-16.
36. Verhelst, N. D., Glas, C. A. W., & Verstralen, H. H. F. M. (1995). The one-parameter logistic model OPLM. Arnhem, The Netherlands: CITO.
37. Walraven, A. M. A. (1995). Instructie in leesstrategieën: Problemen met begrijpend lezen en het effect van instructie aan zwakke lezers [Instruction in reading strategies: Problems with reading comprehension and the effect of instruction to low-achieving pupils]. Amsterdam/ Duivendrecht: Paedologisch Instituut.