Comparing ecological risks of pesticides: The utility of a risk quotient ranking approach across refinements of exposure

Pest Management Science

Volumn 62, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 46-56

  Peterson, Robert K D ^a  

^a MONTANA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Comparative risk assessment; Pesticide exposure; Pesticide toxicity; Risk ranking

Indexed keywords

HERBICIDE; INSECTICIDE; PESTICIDE;

AQUATIC ECOSYSTEM; ECOLOGICAL IMPACT; PESTICIDE; POLLUTION EXPOSURE; RISK ASSESSMENT; TOXICITY;

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; DAPHNIA; ENVIRONMENTAL EXPOSURE; GEOGRAPHY; GREEN ALGA; METHODOLOGY; MONTE CARLO METHOD; NONPARAMETRIC TEST; PERCIFORMES; RAINBOW TROUT; RISK ASSESSMENT;

ALGAE, GREEN; ANIMALS; DAPHNIA; ENVIRONMENTAL EXPOSURE; GEOGRAPHY; HERBICIDES; INSECTICIDES; MONTE CARLO METHOD; ONCORHYNCHUS MYKISS; PERCIFORMES; PESTICIDES; RISK ASSESSMENT; STATISTICS, NONPARAMETRIC;

NORTH AMERICA; UNITED STATES;

INVERTEBRATA; TRACHEOPHYTA; VERTEBRATA;

EID: 32044470728     PISSN: 1526498X     EISSN: 15264998     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/ps.1126     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Higley LG and Wintersteen WK, A novel approach to environmental risk assessment of pesticides as a basis for incorporating environmental costs into economic injury levels. Am Entomol 38:34-39 (1992).
2. Kovach J, Petzold C, Degni J and Tette J, A Method to Measure the Environmental Impact of Pesticides, New York's Food and Life Science Bulletin No. 139. Cornell University, Ithaca, NY (1992).
3. Nelson GC and Bullock DS, Simulating a relative environmental effect of glyphosate-resistant soybeans. Ecol Econ 45:189-202 (2003).
4. Maud J, Edwards-Jones G and Quin F, Comparative evaluation of pesticide risk indices for policy development and assessment in the United Kingdom. Agric Ecosyst Environ 86:59-73 (2001).
5. Finizio A, Calliera M and Vighi M, Rating systems for pesticide risk classification on different ecosystems. Ecotox Environ Saf 49:262-274 (2001).
6. Peterson RKD and Hulting AG, A comparative ecological risk assessment for herbicides used on spring wheat: the effect of glyphosate when used within a glyphosate-tolerant wheat system. Weed Sci 52:834-844 (2004).
7. US Environmental Protection Agency, Guidelines for Expedited Review of Conventional Pesticides Under the Reduced-Risk Initiative and for Biological Pesticides. Pesticide Regulation (PR) Notice 97-3. USEPA, Washington, DC (1997).
8. United States Geological Survey, National Water-Quality Assessment Program (NAWQA). [Online]. USGS, Washington, DC (2004). Available: http://water.usgs.gov/nawqa/[1 November 2004].
9. US Environmental Protection Agency, Ecological Effects Test Guidelines: OPPTS 850.5400 Algal Toxicity, Tiers I and II. EPA 712-C-96-164, April 1996. USEPA, Washington, DC (1996).
10. US Environmental Protection Agency, Ecological Effects Test Guidelines: OPPTS 850.1010 Aquatic Invertebrate Acute Toxicity Test, Freshwater Daphnids. EPA 712-C-96-114, April 1996. USEPA, Washington, DC (1996).
11. US Environmental Protection Agency, Ecological Effects Test Guidelines: OPPTS 850.1300 Daphnid Chronic Toxicity Test. EPA 712-C-96-120, April 1996. USEPA, Washington, DC (1996).
12. US Environmental Protection Agency, Ecological Effects Test Guidelines: OPPTS 850.1075 Fish Acute Toxicity Test, Freshwater and Marine. EPA 712-C-96-118, April 1996. USEPA, Washington, DC (1996).
13. US Environmental Protection Agency, Ecological Effects Test Guidelines: OPPTS 850.1400 Fish Early-Life Stage Toxicity Test, Freshwater and Marine. EPA 712-C-96-121, April 1996. USEPA, Washington, DC (1996).
14. US Environmental Protection Agency, GENEEC, v. 2.0. [Online]. USEPA, Washington, DC (2002). Available: http://www.epa.gov/oppefed1/models/water/ index.htm [1 November 2004].
15. US Department of Agriculture, The Pesticide Properties Database (PPDB). [Online]. USDA, Washington, DC (2004). Available: http://www.ars.usda.gov/ Services/docs.htm?docid=6433 [1 November 2004].
16. United States Geological Survey, National Water Quality Assessment Data Warehouse. USGS, Washington, DC, (2004). Available: http://infotrek.er.usgs.gov/ servlet/page?_pageid=543&_dad=portal30&_schema=PORTAL30 [1 November 2004].
17. Martin JD, Crawford CG and Larson SJ, Expanded Discussion of Methods for Pesticides in Streams: Summary Statistics; Preliminary Results from Cycle I of the National Water Quality Assessment Program (NAWQA), 1992-2001. United States Geological Survey, Washington, DC (2003). Available: http://ca.water.usgs.gov/ pnsp/pestsw/Pest-SW_2001_TextExpand.html [1 November 2004].
18. SAS Institute, SAS/STAT User's Guide. SAS Institute, Cary, NC (2002).
19. US Environmental Protection Agency, Ecotoxicological One-Liner Database. USEPA, Washington, DC (2003). Available: http://www.epa.gov/oppefed1/general/ databasesdescription.htm#ecotoxicity [1 January 2003].
20. US Environmental Protection Agency, Reregistration Eligibility Decision (RED): Alachlor. EPA 738-F-98-018. USEPA, Washington, DC (1998).
21. US Environmental Protection Agency, Interim Reregistration Eligibility Decision (IRED): Atrazine. EPA Case No. 0062. USEPA, Washington, DC (2003).
22. US Environmental Protection Agency, Reregistration Eligibility Decision (RED): Bromoxynil. EPA 738-R-98-013. USEPA, Washington, DC (1998).
23. US Environmental Protection Agency, Reregistration Eligibility Decision (RED): Diuron. EPA Case No. 0046. USEPA, Washington, DC (2003).
24. US Environmental Protection Agency, Registration Eligibility Decision (RED): Thiobencarb. EPA 738-F-97-013. USEPA, Washington, DC (1997).
25. US Environmental Protection Agency, Reregistration Eligibility Decision (RED): Trifluralin. EPA 738-R-95-040. USEPA, Washington, DC (1996).
26. US Environmental Protection Agency, Reregistration Eligibility Decision (RED): Triallate. EPA 738-R-00-021. USEPA, Washington, DC (2001).
27. US Environmental Protection Agency, Reregistration Eligibility Decision (RED): Metribuzin. EPA 738-F-96-006. USEPA, Washington, DC (1998).
28. US Environmental Protection Agency, Interim Reregistration Eligibility Decision (IRED): Azinphos-Methyl EPA Case No. 0235. USEPA, Washington, DC (2001).
29. US Environmental Protection Agency, Interim Reregistration Eligibility Decision (IRED): Disulfoton. EPA Case No. 0102. USEPA, Washington, DC (2002).
30. US Environmental Protection Agency, Interim Reregistration Eligibility Decision (IRED): Ethoprop. EPA Case No. 0106. USEPA, Washington, DC (2002).
31. US Environmental Protection Agency, Malathion Reregistration Eligibility Document: Environmental Fate and Effects Chapter. EPA Case No. 0248. USEPA, Washington, DC (2004).
32. US Environmental Protection Agency, Reregistration Eligibility Decision (RED): Methomyl. EPA 738-R-98-021. USEPA, Washington, DC (1998).
33. US Environmental Protection Agency, Interim Reregistration Eligibility Decision (IRED): Methyl Parathion. EPA Case No. 0153. USEPA, Washington, DC (2003).