-
1
-
-
0029034933
-
Functional results after treatment of rectal prolapse with rectopexy and sigmoid resection
-
Huber FT, Stein H, Siewert JR: Functional results after treatment of rectal prolapse with rectopexy and sigmoid resection. World J Surg 19:138-143, 1995.
-
(1995)
World J Surg
, vol.19
, pp. 138-143
-
-
Huber, F.T.1
Stein, H.2
Siewert, J.R.3
-
2
-
-
0030827092
-
Comparison of three perineal procedures for the treatment of rectal prolapse
-
Agachan F, Reissman P, Pfeifer J, et al: Comparison of three perineal procedures for the treatment of rectal prolapse. South Med J 90:925-932, 1997.
-
(1997)
South Med J
, vol.90
, pp. 925-932
-
-
Agachan, F.1
Reissman, P.2
Pfeifer, J.3
-
3
-
-
0028100123
-
Delorme operation for rectal prolapse
-
Tobin SA, Scott IHK: Delorme operation for rectal prolapse. Br J Surg 81:1681-1684, 1994.
-
(1994)
Br J Surg
, vol.81
, pp. 1681-1684
-
-
Tobin, S.A.1
Scott, I.H.K.2
-
4
-
-
0033953524
-
Evaluation of Delorme's procedure as a treatment for full-thickness rectal prolapse
-
Watts AM, Thompson MRT: Evaluation of Delorme's procedure as a treatment for full-thickness rectal prolapse. Br J Surg 87:218-222, 2000.
-
(2000)
Br J Surg
, vol.87
, pp. 218-222
-
-
Watts, A.M.1
Thompson, M.R.T.2
-
5
-
-
0036246299
-
Neorectal reservoir is not the functional principle of the colonic J-pouch: The volume of a short colonic J-pouch does not differ from a straight coloanal anastomosis
-
Furst A, Burghofer K, Hutzel L, et al: Neorectal reservoir is not the functional principle of the colonic J-pouch: the volume of a short colonic J-pouch does not differ from a straight coloanal anastomosis. Dis Colon Rectum 45:660-667, 2002.
-
(2002)
Dis Colon Rectum
, vol.45
, pp. 660-667
-
-
Furst, A.1
Burghofer, K.2
Hutzel, L.3
-
6
-
-
0029931562
-
Prospective randomized controlled study of clinical function and physiology after low anterior resection: Comparison of straight and colonic J pouch anastomosis
-
Ho YT, Tan M, Seow-Choen F: Prospective randomized controlled study of clinical function and physiology after low anterior resection: comparison of straight and colonic J pouch anastomosis. Br J Surg 83:978-980, 1996.
-
(1996)
Br J Surg
, vol.83
, pp. 978-980
-
-
Ho, Y.T.1
Tan, M.2
Seow-Choen, F.3
-
7
-
-
0030795090
-
Late clinical outcome in a randomized prospective comparison of colonic J pouch and straight coloanal anastomosis
-
Lazorthes F, Chiotasso P, Gamagami HA, et al: Late clinical outcome in a randomized prospective comparison of colonic J pouch and straight coloanal anastomosis. Br J Surg 84:1449-1451, 1997.
-
(1997)
Br J Surg
, vol.84
, pp. 1449-1451
-
-
Lazorthes, F.1
Chiotasso, P.2
Gamagami, H.A.3
-
8
-
-
0028326202
-
Abdominal resection rectopexy with pelvic floor repair with perineal rectosigmoidectomy and pelvic floor repair for full thickness rectal prolapse
-
Deen KI, Grant E, Billingham C, et al: Abdominal resection rectopexy with pelvic floor repair with perineal rectosigmoidectomy and pelvic floor repair for full thickness rectal prolapse. Br J Surg 81:302-304, 1994.
-
(1994)
Br J Surg
, vol.81
, pp. 302-304
-
-
Deen, K.I.1
Grant, E.2
Billingham, C.3
-
9
-
-
0031759824
-
Pouch perineal rectosigmoidectomy gives better functional results then conventional rectosigmoidectomy in elderly patients with rectal prolapse
-
Yoshioka K, Ogunbiyi OA, Keighley MRB: Pouch perineal rectosigmoidectomy gives better functional results then conventional rectosigmoidectomy in elderly patients with rectal prolapse. Br J Surg 85:1525-1526, 1998.
-
(1998)
Br J Surg
, vol.85
, pp. 1525-1526
-
-
Yoshioka, K.1
Ogunbiyi, O.A.2
Keighley, M.R.B.3
|