Comparison of resolution, contrast, and color differentiation among fiberoptic and digital flexible cystoscopes

Journal of Endourology

Volumn 20, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 54-58

  Borin, James F ^a   Abdelshehid, Corollos S ^a   Clayman, Ralph V ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COLOR DISCRIMINATION; CONTRAST; CONTROLLED STUDY; CYSTOSCOPE; FIBER OPTICS; HUMAN; MINIMALLY INVASIVE SURGERY; OPTICAL RESOLUTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

CALIBRATION; COLOR; CYSTOSCOPES; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; FIBER OPTICS; HUMANS;

EID: 32044458461     PISSN: 08927790     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1089/end.2006.20.54     Document Type: Article

References (5)

1. Clayman RV, Reddy P. Lange PH. Flexible fiberoptic and rigid rod lens endoscopy of the lower urinary tract: A prospective controlled comparison. J Urol 1984;131:715-716.
2. Herr HW, Schneider M. Outpatient flexible cystoscopy in men: A randomized study of patient tolerance. J Urol 2001;16:1971-1972.
3. Palit V, Ashurst HN, Biyani CS, Elmasray Y, Puri R, Shah T. Is using lignocaine gel prior to flexible cystoscopy justified? A randomized prospective study. Urol Int 2003;71:389-392.
4. Venkatesh R. Office flexible cystoscopy: Technique and technological evolution. UroTrends 2004;9:2-5.
5. D'Amelio FD. ACMI's new all-digital endoscopy platform. UroTrends 2004;9:1-9.