Consensus strikes back in the Hegselmann-Krause model of continuous opinion dynamics under bounded confidence

JASSS

Volumn 9, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 105-120

  Lorenz, Jan ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

Bifurcation; Bounded Confidence; Continuous Opinion Dynamics; Interactive Markov Chain; Number of Agents; Onesided Dynamics

Indexed keywords

EID: 32044449191     PISSN: 14607425     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. AMBLARD, F. and DEFFUANT, G. (2004), The role of network topology on extremism propagation with the relative agreement opinion dynamics, Physica A, vol. 343, 725-738
2. BEN-NAIM, E., KRAPIVSKY, P.L and REDNER S. (2003), Bifurcation and Patterns in Compromise Processes, Physica D, vol. 183, 190-204
3. CONLISK, J. (1976), Interactive Markov Chains, Journal of Mathematical Sociology, vol. 4, 157-185
4. DEFFUANT, G., NEAU, D., AMBLARD, F. and WEISBUCH, C. (2002), How can extremism prevail? A study based on the relative agreement interaction model, Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, vol. 5, no. 4, http://jasss.soc.surrey.ac.uk/5/4/1.html
5. DITTMER, Jan Christian (2001), Consensus Formation under bounded Confidence, Nonlinear Analysis, vol. 47, 4615-4621
6. HEGSELMANN, R. (2004). Opinion Dynamics n Insights by Radically Simplifying Models,.In: Gillies D. (Ed), Laws and Models in Science, London, 1-29.
7. HEGSELMANN, R. and KRAUSE, U. (2002) Opinion Dynamics and Bounded Condence Models, Analysis and Simulation, Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulations, vol. 5, no. 3, http://jasss.soc.surrey.ac.uk/JASSS/5/3/2. html
8. HERMANNS, H. (2002), Interactive Markov chains: and the quest for quantified quality, Springer
9. HORST, U. (2001), Convergence of locally and globally interacting Markov chains, Stochastic Processes and their Application, vol. 96, 99-121
10. JAGER, W. and AMBLARD, F. (2005), Uniformity, bipolarisation and pluriformity captured as generic stylized behaviour with an agent-based simulation model of attitude change, Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory, vol. 10, 295-303
11. LORENZ, J. (2005), A Stabilization Theorem for Dynamics of Continuous Opinions, Physica A, Vol. 355 (1), 217-223
12. LORENZ, J. (2005), Continuous Opinion Dynamics: Insights through Interactive Markov Chains; In Proceedings of IASTED Conference "Modelling, Simulation and Optimization ∼ MSO 2005∼", August 29-31, 2005, Oranjestad, Aruba available at http://www.janlo.de
13. NEAU (2000), D. Révisions des croyances dans un systéme díagents en interaction, rapport díoption de Iíécole polytechnique, available at http://www.lps.ens.fr/~weisbuch/rapneau.ps
14. POLHILL, G. and IZQUIERDO, L. (2005), three papers in JASSS
15. URBIG, D. (2003), Attitude Dynamics with Limited Verbalisation Capabilities, Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, vol. 6, no. 1, http://jasss.soc.surrey.ac.uk/6/1/2.html
16. URBIG, D. and LORENZ, J. (2004), Communication regimes in opinion dynamics: Changing the number of communicating agents; Proceedings of the Second Conference of the European Social Simulation Association (ESSA), Valladolid, Spain, September 16-19, 2004, available at http://www.janlo.de
17. WEISBUCH, G., DEFFUANT, G., AMBLARD, F. and NADAL, J. (2002), Meet, Discuss and Segregatel, Complexity, vol. 7 no. 3, 55-63