Sclerosing papillary lesion of the breast: A diagnostic pitfall for malignancy in fine needle aspiration biopsy

Diagnostic Cytopathology

Volumn 34, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 114-118

  Saad, Reda S ^a,b   Kanbour Shakir, Amal ^a   Syed, Ahmed ^a   Kanbour, Anisa ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH   (United States)

^b ALLEGHENY GENERAL HOSPITAL   (United States)

Author keywords

Breast papillary lesions; FNA; Pitfalls; Sclerosing papilloma

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ASPIRATION BIOPSY; BREAST CARCINOMA; BREAST PAPILLOMA; CELL NUCLEUS; CELL PROLIFERATION; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONSULTATION; CYTODIAGNOSIS; DIAGNOSTIC PROCEDURE; EPITHELIUM HYPERPLASIA; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; LABORATORY DIAGNOSIS; MAMMOGRAPHY; MORPHOLOGY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; SMEAR; SYRINGE;

ADULT; AGED; APOCRINE GLANDS; BIOPSY, FINE-NEEDLE; BREAST; BREAST NEOPLASMS; CARCINOMA, PAPILLARY; EPITHELIAL CELLS; FALSE POSITIVE REACTIONS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MIDDLE AGED; SCLEROSIS;

EID: 32044447742     PISSN: 87551039     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/dc.20419     Document Type: Review

References (31)

1. Hammond S, Keyhani-Rofagha S, O'Toole RV. Statistical analysis of fine needle aspiration cytology of the breast. A review of 678 cases plus 4,265 cases from the literature. Acta Cytol 1989;31:276-80.
2. Silverman JF, Lannin DR, O'Brein K, Morris HT. The triage role of fine needle aspiration biopsy of palpable breast masses. Acta Cytol 1987;31:731-736.
3. Bell DA, Hajdu SI, Urban JR, Gaston JP. Role of aspiration cytology in the diagnosis and management of mammary lesions in office practice. Cancer 1983;51:1182-1189.
4. Sneige N. Fine needle aspiration of the breast: a review of 1,995 cases with emphasis on diagnostic pitfalls. Diagn Cytopathol 1993; 9:106-112.
5. Rosen PP. Microglandular adenosis: benign lesion simulating invasive mammary carcinoma. Am J Surg Pathol 1983;7:137.
6. Rickert R, Kulisher L, Hutler R. Indurative mastopathy: benign sclerosing lesion of breast with elastosis which may simulate carcinoma. Cancer 1981;47:1981.
7. Carter D, Orr SL, Merino MJ. Intracystic papillary carcinoma of the breast after mastectomy, radiotherapy, or excisional biopsy alone. Cancer 1983;52:14-19.
8. Hunter CE, Sayers JL. Intracystic papillary carcinoma of the breast. South Med J 1980;73:1484-1486.
9. Wilson M, Cranor ML, Rosen PP. Papillary duct hyperplasia of the breast in children and young women. Mod Pathol 1993;6:570-574.
10. Jeffrey PB, Ljung BM. Benign and malignant papillary lesions of the breast: A cytomorphologic study. Am J Clin Pathol 1994;101: 500-507.
11. Keen ME, Murad TM, Cohen MI, Mathies HJ. Benign breast lesions with malignant clinical and mammographic presentations. Hum Pathol 1985;16:1147-1152.
12. Murad TM, Swaid S, Prichett P. Malignant and benign papillary lesions of the breast. Hum Pathol 1977;8:379-390.
13. Kline TS. Masquerades of malignancy: A review of 4,241 aspirates from the breast. Acta Cytol 1981;25:263-266.
14. Kline TS, Kannan V. Papillary carcinoma of the breast: A cytomorphologic analysis. Arch Pathol Lab Med 1986;110:189-191.
15. NIH Consensus Development Conference: the uniform approach to breast fine-needle aspiration biopsy. Am J Surg 1997;174:371-385.
16. Masood S, Loya A, Khalbuss W. Is core needle biopsy superior to fine needle aspiration biopsy in the diagnosis of papillary breast lesions? Diagn Cytopathol 2003;28:329-334.
17. Fessia L, Botta G, Arisio R, Verga M, Aimone A. Fine needle aspiration of breast lesions: Role and accuracy in a review of 7,495 cases. Diagn Cytopathol 1987;3:121-125.
18. Patel J, Cartell PC, Smallwood JA. et al. Fine needle aspiration cytology of breast masses: an evaluation of its accuracy and reasons for diagnostic failure. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 1987;69:156-159.
19. Petersen JL, Koolman-Schellekens MA, Peppel-Vande, Ham TV, Heerde PV. Atypia in fine-needle aspiration cytology of the breast: A histologic follow-up study of 301 cases. Semin Diagn Pathol 1989;6:126-134.
20. Scopa CD, Koukouras D, Androulakis J, Bonikos D. Sources of diagnostic discrepancies in fine-needle aspiration of the breast. Diagn Cytopathol 1991;7:546-548.
21. Cohen MB, Rodgers C, hales MS, et al. Influence of training and experience in fine-needle aspiration biopsy of breast. Arch Pathol Labmed 1987;111:518-520.
22. All-Kaisi N. The spectrum of the "Gray Zone" in breast cytology: a review of 186 cases of atypical and suspicious cytology. Acta Cytol 1994;38:989-908.
23. Kline TS, Kannan V. Papillary carcinoma of the breast: A cytomorphologic analysis. Arch Pathol Lab Med 1986;110:189-191.
24. Dawson AE, Mulford DK. Benign versus malignant papillary neoplasm of the breast: diagnostic clues in fine needle aspiration cytology. Acta Cytol 1994;38:23-28.
25. Mosunjac MB, Lewis MM, Lawson MT, Cohen C. Use of novel marker, calponin, for the myoepithelial cells in fine needle aspirates of papillary breast lesions. Diagn Cytopathol 2000;23:151-155. Also ref 6 therin.
26. Bardales RH, Suhrland MJ, Stanley MW. Papillary neoplasms of the breast: fine needle aspiration findings in cystic and solid cases. Diagn Cytopathol 1994;10:336-341.
27. Liberman L, Drotman M, Morris EA, et al. Imaging-histologic discordance at percutaneous breast biopsy. Cancer 2000;89:2538-2546.
28. Michael CW, Buschmann B. Can true papillary neoplasm and their mimickers be accurately classified by cytology? Cancer 2002;96: 92-100.
29. Naran S, Simpson J, Gupta RK. Cytological diagnosis of papillary carcinoma of the breast in needle aspirates. Diagn Cytopathol 1988; 4:33-37.
30. Kraus FT, Neubecker RI. The differential diagnosis of papillary tumors of the breast. Cancer 1963;115:444-445.
31. Raju UB, Lee MW, Zarbo RJ, Crissman JD. Papillary neoplasia of the breast: immunohistochemically defined myoepithelial cells in the diagnosis of benign and malignant papillary breast neoplasm. Mod Pathol 1989;2:569-576.