Issues in the classification of kinship terminologies : Toward a new typology

Anthropos

Volumn 101, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 203-219

  Kronenfeld, David B ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Alternative systems; Kinship terminology; Pragmatics; Semantics; Typology

Indexed keywords

EID: 32044440720     PISSN: 02579774     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Review

References (51)

1. Allen, N.J. 1998 The Prehistory of Dravidian-Type Terminologies. In: M. Godelier et al. (eds.); pp. 314-331.
2. Denham, Woodrow W., and Douglas R. White 2005 Multiple Measures of Alyawarra Kinship. Field Methods 17/1.
3. Dougherty, Janet W. D., and Charles M. Keller 1985 Taskonomy. A Practical Approach to Knowledge Structures. In: J. W. D. Dougherty (ed.), Directions in Cognitive Anthropology; pp. 161-174. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
4. Godelier, Maurice, Thomas R. Trautmann, and Franklin E. Tjon Sie Fat (eds.) 1998 Transformations of Kinship. Washington: Smithsonian Institution Press. [Papers of the Round Table on Dravidian Kinship, Maison Suger, Paris, June 3-5 1993]
5. Goodenough, Ward H. 1956a Componential Analysis and the Study of Meaning. Language 32: 195-216.
6. 1956b Residence Rules. Southwestern Journal of Anthropology 12:22-37.
7. Gould, Sydney H. 2000 A New System for the Formal Analysis of Kinship. Edited, Annotated, and with an Introduction by David B. Kronenfeld. Lanham: University Press of America.
8. Greenberg, Joseph H. 1966 Language Universals. In: T. A. Sebeok (ed.), Current Trends in Linguistics. Vol. III: Theoretical Foundations; pp. 61-112. The Hague: Mouton.
9. Hage, Per 1998a Proto-Polynesian Kin Terms and Descent Groups. Oceanic Linguistics 37: 189-192.
10. 1998b Was Proto-Oceanic Society Matrilineal? The Journal of the Polynesian Society 107: 365-379.
11. 1999a Linguistic Evidence for Primogeniture and Rank in Proto-Oceanic Society. Oceanic Linguistics 38: 366-375.
12. 1999b Marking Universals and the Structure and Evolution of Kinship Terminologies. Evidence from Salish. The Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 5:423-441.
13. 2001 Marking Theory and Kinship Analysis. Cross-Cultural and Historical Applications. Anthropological Theory 1: 197-211.
14. Headland, Thomas N., Kenneth L. Pike, and Marvin Harris 1990 Emies and Etics. The Insider/Outsider Debate. Newbury Park: Sage Publications. (Frontiers of Anthropology, 7)
15. Kay, Paul 1965 A Generalization of the Cross/Parallel Distinction. American Anthropologist 67: 30-43.
16. 1975 The Generative Analysis of Kinship Semantics. A Reanalysis of the Seneca Dada. Foundations of Language 13:201-214.
17. Keen, Ian 1985 Definitions of Kin. Journal of Anthropological Research 41:62-90.
18. Kronenfeld, David B. 1973 Fanti Kinship. The Structure of Terminology and Behavior. American Anthropologist 75: 1577-1595.
19. 1974 Sibling Typology. Beyond Nerlove and Romney. American Ethnologist 1:489-506.
20. 1980a A Formal Analysis of Fanti Kinship Terminology (Ghana). Anthropos 75: 586-608.
21. 1980b Particularistic or Universalistic Analyses of Fanti KinTerminology. The Alternative Goals of Terminological Analysis. Man 15: 151-169.
22. 1989 Morgan vs. Dorsey on the Omaha Cross/Parallel Contrast. Theoretical Implications. L'Homme 29/109:76-106.
23. 1991 Fanti Kinship. Language, Inheritance, and Kin Groups. Anthropos 86: 19-31.
24. 1992 Goodenough vs. Fischer on Residence. A Generation Later. Journal of Quantitative Anthropology 4: 1-21.
25. 1996 Plastic Glasses and Church Fathers. Semantic Extension from the Ethnoscience Tradition. New York: Oxford University Press. (Oxford Studies in Anthropological Linguistics)
26. 2001a Introduction. The Uses of Formal Analysis re Cognitive and Social Issues. Anthropological Theory 1: 147-172.
27. 2001b Using Sydney H. Gould's Formalization of Kin Terminologies. Social Information, Skewing, and Structural Types. Anthropological Theory 1: 173-196.
28. 2004 Definitions of Cross vs. Parallel, implications for a New Typology (An Appreciation of A. Kimball Romney). Cross-Cultural Research 38: 249-269.
29. in press Formal Rules, Cognitive Representations, and Learning in Language and Other Cultural Systems. [To appear in Language Sciences]
30. Lehman, F. K. (F. K. L. Chit Hlaing) 1993 The Relationship between Genealogical and Terminological Structure in Kinship Terminologies. Journal of Quantitative Anthropology 4: 95-122.
31. 2001 Aspects of a Formalist Theory of Kinship. The Functional Basis of Its Genealogical Roots and Some Extensions in Generalized Alliance Theory. Anthropological Theory 1:212-238.
32. Lehman, F. K., and Klaus Witz 1974 Prolegomena to a Formal Theory of Kinship. In: P. Ballonoff (ed.), Genealogical Mathematics; pp. 111-134. Paris: Mouton.
33. Liu, Pin-Hsiung 1986 Foundations of Kinship Mathematics. Nankang, Taipei: Institute of Ethnology, Academia Sinica.
34. Lounsbury, Floyd G. 1956 A Semantic Analysis of the Pawnee Kinship Usage. Language 32: 158-194.
35. 1964a A Formal Account of the Crow- and Omaha-Type Kinship Terminologies. In: W. H. Goodenough (ed.), Explorations in Cultural Anthropology; pp. 351-393. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company.
36. 1964b The Structural Analysis of Kinship Semantics. In: H. G. Hunt (ed.), Proceedings of the Ninth International Congress of Linguists; pp. 1073-1093. The Hague: Mouton.
37. 1965 Another View of Trobriand Kinship Categories. In: E. A. Hammel (ed.), Formal Semantic Analysis; pp. 142-185. Menasha: American Anthropological Association. [American Anthropologist 67/5, Part 2; Special Publication]
38. Nerlove, Sara, and A. Kimball Romney 1967 Sibling Terminology and Cross-Sex Behavior. American Anthropologist 69: 179-187.
39. Morgan, Lewis Henry 1871 Systems of Consanguinity and Affinity of the Human Family. Washington: Smithsonian Institution. (Smith-sonian Contributions to Knowledge, 218)
40. Pike, Kenneth 1967 Language in Relation to a Unified Theory of the Structure of Human Behavior. The Hague: Mouton. [2nd edition; first edition in three volumes: 1954, 1955, 1960]
41. Read, Dwight W. n.d. Outline for a General Theory of the Production of Kinship Terminologies and Their Relationship to Genealogy. Personal communication, 5 November 2002.
42. 1984 An Algebraic Account of the American Kinship Terminology. Current Anthropology 25:417-449.
43. 2001 Formal Analysis of Kinship Terminologies and Its Relationship to What Constitutes Kinship. Anthropological Theory 1:239-267.
44. Read, Dwight W., and Clifford Behrens 1990 KAES. An Expert System for the Algebraic Analysis of Kinship Terminologies. Journal of Quantitative Anthropology 2:353-393.
45. Romney, A. Kimball 1965 Kalmuk Mongol and the Classification of Lineal Kinship Terminologies. In: E. A. Hammel (ed.), Formal Semantic Analysis; pp. 127-141. Menasha: American Anthropological Association. [American Anthropologist 67/5, Part 2; Special Publication]
46. Romney, A. Kimball, and Roy Goodwin D'Andrade 1964 Cognitive Aspects of English Kin Terms. In: A. K. Romney and R. G. D'Andrade (eds.), Transcultural Studies in Cognition; pp. 146-170. [American Anthropologist 66/3, Part 2; Special Publication]
47. Romney, A. Kimball, and Carmella C. Moore 1998 Toward a Theory of Culture as Shared Cognitive Structures. Ethos 26: 314-337.
48. Tjon Sie Fat, Franklin 1998 On the Formal Analysis of "Dravidian," "Iroquois," and "Generational" Varieties as Nearly Associative Combinations. In: M. Godelier et al. (eds.); pp. 59-93.
49. Trautmann, Thomas R. 1981 Dravidian Kinship. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Cambridge Studies in Social Anthropology, 36.)
50. Tyler, Stephen A. 1966 Parallel/Cross. An Evaluation of Definitions. Southwestern Journal of Anthropology 22:416-432.
51. Wallace, Anthony F. C., and John Atkins 1960 The Meaning of Kinship Terms. American Anthropologist 62:58-80.