Federal repatriation legislation and the role of physical anthropology in repatriation

Yearbook of Physical Anthropology

Volumn 48, Issue , 2005, Pages 2-32

  Ousley, Stephen D ^a,b   Billeck, William T ^a   Hollinger, R Eric ^a  

^a SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION   (United States)

^b DEPARTMENT OF PALEOBIOLOGY   (United States)

Author keywords

Cultural affiliation; Forensic anthropology; NAGPRA; NMAIA

Indexed keywords

EID: 32044438952     PISSN: 0096848X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/ajpa.20354     Document Type: Review

References (175)

1. Adams RM. 1987. Smithsonian horizons. Smithsonian 18:12.
2. Ahler SA. 1993. Plains village cultural taxonomy for the upper knife-heart region. In: Thiessen TD, editor. The phase I archaeological research program for the Knife River Indian Villages National Historic Site, part IV: interpretation of the archaeological record. Occasional studies in anthropology 27. Lincoln, NE: Midwest Archeological Center, National Park Service, p 57-108.
3. Albrecht GH. 1980. Multivariate analysis and the study of form, with special reference to canonical variates analysis. Am Zool 20:679-693.
4. Albrecht GH. 1992. Assessing the affinities of fossils using canonical variates and generalized distances. Hum Evol 7:49-69.
5. Arbolino R. 2005. Comparing the pace of the repatriation process: the Smithsonian vs. NAGPRA institutions. Abstracts of the 70th Annual Meeting. Washington, DC: Society for American Archaeology, p 34.
6. Bass WM. 1964. The variation in physical types of the prehistoric Plains Indians. Plains Anthropologist, Memoir 1:65-145.
7. Baugh TG, Makseyn-Kelley SA. 1992. People of the stars: Pawnee heritage and the Smithsonian Institution. Washington, DC: Repatriation Office, National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution.
8. Benjamin DM. 2001. Are pharmacologists/toxicologists without medical degrees or MDs best qualified to testify about drugs? Proc Am Acad Forensic Sci 7:150-151.
9. Billeck WT. 2002. Cultural affiliation and repatriation in the Great Plains of the United States. J Am Archaeol 21:89-105.
10. Billeck WT. 2004. Museums and repatriation: one case study. In: Selig RS, London MR, Kaupp PA, editors. Anthropology explored. Washington, DC: Smithsonian Books, p 430-436.
11. Billeck WT. 2005. Repatriation at the National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution. Abstracts of the 70th Annual Meeting. Washington, DC: Society for American Archaeology, p 48.
12. Billeck WT, Jones EB, Makesyn-Kelley SA, Verano JW. 1995. Inventory and assessment of human remains and associated funerary objects potentially affiliated with the Pawnee in the National Museum of Natural History. Washington, DC: Repatriation Office, National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution.
13. Billeck WT, Eubanks E, Lockhard A, Cash Cash P. 2005. Inventory and assessment of human remains and associated funerary objects potentially affiliated with the Ankara in the National Museum of Natural History. Washington, DC: Repatriation Office, National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution.
14. Black HL, Black HC. 1990. Black's law dictionary. St. Paul, MN: West Publishing Co.
15. Bray TL. 2001. The future of the past: archaeologists, Native Americans, and repatriation. New York: Garland Publishing.
16. Bray TL, Killion TW, editors. 1994. Reckoning with the dead: the Larsen Bay repatriation and the Smithsonian Institution. Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution Press.
17. Brothwell D. 2004. Bring out your dead: people, pots and politics. Antiquity 78:414-418.
18. Bruwelheide KS, Beck JB, Pelot SB. 2001. Standardized protocol for radiographic and photographic documentation of human skeletons. In Williams E, editor. Human remains: conservation, retrieval and analysis. BAR international series934. Oxford: Basingstoke Press. p 153-165.
19. Buikstra JE, Gordon CC. 1981. The study and restudy of human skeletal series: the importance of long term curation. In: Chantwell AM, Griffin JB, Rothschild NA, editors. The research potential of anthropological museum collections. New York, NY: New York Academy of Sciences, p 449-465.
20. Buikstra JE, Ubelaker DH. 1994. Standards for data collection from human skeletal remains. Fayetteville: Arkansas Archaeological Survey.
21. Carlyle SW, Parr RL, Hayes MG, O'Rourke DH. 2000. Context of maternal lineages in the greater Southwest. Am J Phys Anthropol 113:85-101.
22. Chippindale C. 2005. NAGPRA in the "51st state?": The Palmer report and human remains in British collections. Abstracts of the 70th Annual Meeting. Washington, DC: Society for American Archaeology, p 71.
23. Christensen AM. 2004. The impact of Daubert: implications for testimony and research in forensic anthropology (and the use of frontal sinuses in personal identification). J Forensic Sci 49:1-4.
24. Cole W. 2004. Recovering the fallen. Honolulu Advertiser, August 1. http://the.honoluluadvertiser.com/specials/recoveringthefallen/story1.html
25. Collins WA. 1882. Letter of June 12 to Dr. D.L. Huntington, Army Medical Museum.
26. Crowther W. 2000. Native American Graves and Repatriation Act: how Kennewick Man uncovered the problems in NAGPRA. J Land Resources Environ Law 20:269-291.
27. Darroch JN, Mosimann JE. 1985. Canonical and principal components of shape. Biometrika 72:241-252.
28. Department for Culture, Media, and Sport. 2003. The report of the working group in human remains. London: Department for Culture, Media, and Sport, Cultural Property Unit.
29. Dongoske KE. 1996. The Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act: a new beginning, not the end, for osteological analysis-a Hopi perspective. Am Indian Q 20:287-297.
30. Donnelly S, Hens SM, Rogers NL, Schneider KL. 1998. A blind test of mandibular ramus flexure as a morphological indicator of sexual dimorphism in the human skeleton. Am J Phys Anthropol 107:363-366.
31. Dudar JC, Ortner DJ. 2004. A rare case of Albright hereditary osteodystrophy from the Anasazi site of Kintiel, Arizona. Proceedings of the 31st Annual Meeting of the Paleopathology Association, Tampa, Florida, p 14.
32. Edgar HJH. 2002. Biological distance and the African-American dentition. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Ohio State University.
33. El-Najjar MY. 1977. The distribution of human skeletal material in the continental United States. Am J Phys Anthropol 46: 507-512.
34. Eng JT, Walker PL. 2002. Resolving cultural affiliation through multiple methods: a case study. Am J Phys Anthropol [Suppl] 34:67.
35. Eveleth PB, Tanner JM. 1990. Worldwide variation in human growth. 2nd ed. New York: Cambridge University Press.
36. Faigman DL, Kaye DH, Saks MJ, Sanders J. 2002. Modern scientific evidence: the law and science in expert testimony. St. Paul, MN: West Publishing Co.
37. Federal Register. 1995. 43 CFR 10. Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act Regulations; Final Rule, December 4, 1995. Fed Reg 60:62134-62158.
38. Federal Register. 2000a. Notice of inventory completion for Native American remains and associated funerary objects in the possession of the University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, NE, October 2, 2000. Fed Reg 65:58796-58803.
39. Federal Register. 2000b. Notice of inventory completion for Native American remains and associated funerary objects in the possession of the University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, NE, October 2, 2000. Fed Reg 65:58803-58806.
40. Federal Register. 2000c. NAGPRA Review Committee advisory findings and recommendations regarding human remains and associated funerary objects in the control of Chaco Culture National Historical Park, February 10, 2000. Fed Reg 65: 6621-6622.
41. Federal Register. 2000d. Recommendations regarding the disposition of culturally unidentifiable Native American human remains, June 8, 2000. Fed Reg 65:36462-36464.
42. Feinberg SE, Krislov SH, Straf ML. 1995. Understanding and evaluation statistical evidence in litigation. Jurimetrics 36:1-32.
43. Field Museum. 2005. Field Museum to return human remains to Native American tribe. Web document. http://www.fieldmuseum.org/museum_info/press/ press_haida.htm.
44. Fine-Dare KS. 2002. Grave injustice: the American Indian repatriation movement and NAGPRA. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
45. Fully G. 1956. Une nouvelle méthode de détermination de la taille. Ann Med Leg 35:266-273.
46. Goldstein L. 2005. NAGPRA's effects on archaeological interpretation: the long term and the long view. Abstracts of the 70th Annual Meeting. Washington, DC: Society for American Archaeology, p 120.
47. Grayson GW. 1889. Notes on Delaware wake, Kiowa funeral, and the Wichita tribal name, made while at the Wichita reservation. BAE manuscript 4732 (Delaware, Kiowa, and Wichita), National Anthropological Archives, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, DC.
48. Green R, Mitchell NM. 1990. American Indian sacred objects, skeletal remains, repatriation and reburial: a resource guide. Washington, DC: American Indian Program, National Museum of American History, Smithsonian Institution.
49. Hall RL. 1962. The archaeology of Carcajou Point. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
50. Harrington RJ, Swift B, Huffine EF. 2003. Introducing Daubert to the Balkans. Proc Am Acad Forensic Sci 9:246-247.
51. Hauser G, De Stefane GF. 1989. Epigenetic variants of the human skull. Stuttgart: E. Schweizerbart'sche Verlagsbuchhandlung.
52. Hayes MG. 2001. Ancestor descendant relationships in North American Arctic prehistory: ancient DNA evidence from the Aleutian Islands and the eastern Canadian Arctic. Am J Phys Anthropol [Suppl] 32:78.
53. Hefner JT, Ousley SD, Warren MW. 2004. An historical perspective of nonmetric traits: Hooton and the Harvard list. Proc Am Acad Forensic Sci 10:287.
54. Henning DR. 1998. Managing Oneota: a reiteration and testing of contemporary archaeological taxonomy. Wis Archeol 79:9-28.
55. Herrmann NP. 2002. Biological affinities of Archaic period populations from west-central Kentucky and Tennessee. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Tennessee, Knoxville.
56. Hill CA. 2000. Technical note: evaluating mandibular ramus flexure as a morphological indicator of sex. Am J Phys Anthropol 111:573-577.
57. Hollinger RE. 2005. Repatriation as applied anthropology at the Smithsonian Institution. Abstracts of the 70th Annual Meeting. Washington, DC: Society for American Archaeology, p 143.
58. Hollinger RE, Botic C. 2005. Inventory and assessment of human remains potentially affiliated to the northwestern band of the Shoshone in the National Museum of Natural History. Washington, DC: Repatriation Office, National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution.
59. Hollinger RE, Eubanks E, Ousley SD. 2004. Inventory and assessment of human remains and funerary objects from the Point Barrow region, Alaska, in the National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution. Washington, DC: Repatriation Office, National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution.
60. Houck M, Ubelaker DH, Ousley SD. 2001. D.B. or not D.B.? That is the question. Proc Am Acad Forensic Sci 7:250.
61. Howells WW. 1973. Cranial variation in man. Volume 67. Papers of the Peabody Museum of Archaeology and Ethnology, Harvard University. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University.
62. Howells WW. 1996. Howells' craniometric data on the Internet. Am J Phys Anthropol 101:441-442.
63. Hrdlička A. 1942. Catalog of human crania in the United States National Museum collections: Eskimo in general. Proc US Natl Mus 91:169-429.
64. Huberty CJ. 1994. Applied discriminant analysis. New York: John Wiley and Sons.
65. Inouye DK. 1990. Statement of Hon. Daniel K. Inouye, U.S. senator from Hawaii, Chairman, Select Committee on Indian Affairs. Native American Grave and Burial Protection Act (Repatriation); Native American Repatriation of Cultural Patrimony Act; and Heard Museum report, hearing before the Select Committee on Indian Affairs, 101st Congress. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office.
66. Jantz RL. 1972. Cranial variation and microevolution in Arikara skeletal populations. Plains Anthropol 17:20-35.
67. Jantz RL. 1973. Microevolutionary change in Ankara crania: a multivariate analysis. Am J Phys Anthropol 38:15-26.
68. Jantz RL. 1977. Craniometric relationships of Plains populations: historical and evolutionary implications. Plains Anthropol 22:162-176.
69. Jantz RL. 1993. Pawnee-Central Plains relations: the craniometric evidence. Report to the Repatriation Office. Washington, DC: National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution.
70. Jantz RL. 1995. Franz Boas and Native American biological variability. Hum Biol 67:345-353.
71. Jantz RL. 2003. The anthropometric legacy of Franz Boas. Econ Hum Biol 1:277-284.
72. Jantz RL, Meadows Jantz L. 2000. Secular change in craniofacial morphology. Am J Hum Biol 12:327-338.
73. Jantz RL, Owsley DW. 2001. Variation among early North American crania. Am J Phys Anthropol 114:146-155.
74. Jantz RL, Willey P. 1983. Temporal and geographic patterning of relative head height in the Central Plains and Middle Missouri area. Plains Anthropol 28:59-67.
75. Jantz RL, Owsley DW, Willey P. 1978. Craniometric relationships of Central Plains populations. In: Blakeslee DJ, editor. The Central Plains tradition: internal development and external relationships. Report 11, office of the State Archaeologist. Iowa City: University of Iowa, p 144-156.
76. Jantz RL, Owsley DW, Willey P. 1981. Craniometric variation in the northern and central plains. Plains Anthropol Mem 17:19-29.
77. Kaestle FA, Horsburgh KA. 2002. Ancient DNA in anthropology: methods, applications, and ethics. Yrbk Phys Anthropol 45: 92-130.
78. Kaestle FA, Smith DG. 2001. Ancient mitochondrial DNA evidence for prehistoric population movement: the Numic expansion. Am J Phys Anthropol 115:1-12.
79. Kelley MA, Larsen CS (eds). 1991. Advances in Dental Anthropology. New York: Wiley-Liss.
80. Key P, Jantz RL. 1981. A multivariate analysis of temporal change in Arikara craniometrics: a methodological approach. Am J Phys Anthropol 55:247-259.
81. Killion TW. 2001. On the course of repatriation. Process, practice, and progress at the National Museum of Natural History. In: Bray TL, editor. The future of the past: archaeologists, Native Americans, and repatriation. New York: Garland Publishing. p 149-168.
82. Killion TW, Molloy P. 2000. Repatriation's silver lining. In: Dongoske KE Aldenderfer M, Doehner K, editors. Working together: Native Americans and archaeologists. Washington, DC: Society for American Archaeology. p 111-118.
83. Kintigh KW. 2000. Testimony on the Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act to the Senate Committee on Indian Affairs. July 25. http://indian.senate.gov/2000hrgs/nagpra_0725/kintigh.pdf
84. Konigsberg LW. 1988. Migration models of prehistoric postmarital residence. Am J Phys Anthropol 77:471-482.
85. Konigsberg LW. 1990a. Analysis of prehistoric biological variation under a model of isolation by geographic and temporal distance. Hum Biol 62:49-70.
86. Konigsberg LW. 1990b. Temporal aspects of biological distance: serial correlation and trend in a prehistoric skeletal lineage. Am J Phys Anthropol 82:45-52.
87. Konigsberg LW, Blangero J. 1993. Multivariate quantitative genetic simulations in anthropology with an example from the South Pacific. Hum Biol 65:897-915.
88. Koot MG. 2003. Radiographic human identification using bones of the hand: a validation study. Proc Am Acad Forensic Sci 9:263.
89. Krzanowski WJ. 2000. Principles of multivariate analysis. New York: Oxford University Press.
90. Kuwanwisiwma L. 1999. Testimony of the director of the Cultural Preservation Office for the Hopi tribe. Minutes of the Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Review Committee, eighteenth meeting, November 18-20 1999. Salt Lake City, Utah. http://www.cr.nps.gov/NAGPRA/REVIEW/meetings/ RMS018.PDF
91. Lamb DS. 1917. A history of the United States Army Medical Museum, 1862 to 1917, compiled for the official records. Unpublished manuscript on file, National Museum of Health and Medicine, Armed Forces Institute of Pathology, Washington, DC.
92. Landau PM, Steele DG. 2000. Why anthropologists study human remains. In: Mihesuah DA, editor. 2000. Repatriation reader: who owns American Indian remains? Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press. p 74-94.
93. Larsen CS. 2000. Comments on the "Draft principles of agreement regarding the disposition of culturally unidentifiable human remains" submitted in March, 2000, by the AAPA to the Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act Review Committee. http://www.physanth.org/positions/cuhr. htm.
94. Larsen CS, Walker PL. 2005. Ethics in bioarchaeology. In: Turner T, editor. From repatriation to genetic identity: biological anthropology and ethics. Albany: State University of New York Press. p 111-119.
95. Lippert DT. 2002. Inventory and assessment of human remains and funerary objects from Kauwerak, Akavingayak and Port Clarence, Alaska, in the National Museum of Natural History. Washington, DC: Repatriation Office, National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution.
96. London MR, Wilczak CA, Dudar JC, Ousley SD. 2005. Congenital and developmental defects of the vertebral column in samples from Hawikku and Puye, New Mexico. Am J Phys Anthropol [Suppl] 40:140.
97. Loth SR, Henneberg M. 1996. Mandibular ramus flexure: a new morphologic indicator of sexual dimorphism in the human skeleton. Am J Phys Anthropol 99:473-485.
98. Loth SR, Henneberg M. 2001. Sexually dimorphic mandibular morphology in the first few years of life. Am J Phys Anthropol 115:179-186.
99. Lovis WA, Kintigh KW, Steponaitis VP, Goldstein LG. 2004. Archaeological perspectives on the Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act: underlying principles, legislative history and current issues. In: Richman JR, Forsyth MP, editors. Legal perspectives on cultural resources. Walnut Creek, CA: AltaMira Press. p 165-184.
100. Lundy JK. 1988. A report on the use of Fully's anatomical method to estimate stature in military skeletal remains. J Forensic Sci 33:534-553.
101. Mann MM, Ousley SD 2001. Using nontraditional craniometrics to address museum, repatriation, and other forensic questions. Proc Am Acad Forensic Sci 7:263.
102. Mann RW, Anderson BE, Holland TD, Rankin DR, Webb JE Jr. 2003. Unusual "crime" scenes. In: Steadman DW, editor. Hard evidence: case studies in forensic anthropology. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall, p 108-116.
103. McKeown AH. 2000. Investigating variation among Ankara crania using geometric morphometry. Ph.D. dissertation, Department of Anthropology, University of Tennessee, Knoxville.
104. McLachlan GJ. 1992. Discriminant analysis and statistical pattern recognition. New York: Wiley and Sons.
105. McLaughlin RH. 2004. NAGPRA, dialogue, and the politics of historical authority. In: Richman JR, Forsyth MP, editors. Legal perspectives on cultural resources. Walnut Creek, CA: Altamira Press. p 185-201.
106. McManamon FP, Roberts JC, Blades BS. 2000. Examination of the Kennewick remains-taphonomy, micro-sampling, and DNA analysis. In: Report on the DNA testing results of the Kennewick human remains from Columbia Park, Kennewick, Washington. Washington, DC: Department of the Interior. http://www.cr.nps.gov/ aad/kennewick/index.htm.
107. Meadows Jantz L, Jantz RL. 1999. Secular change in long bone length and proportion in the United States, 1800-1970. Am J Phys Anthropol 110:57-67.
108. Merchant VL, Ubelaker DH. 1977. Skeletal growth of the protohistoric Ankara. Am J Phys Anthropol 46:61-72.
109. Mihesuah DA. 2000. Repatriation reader: who owns American Indian remains? Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
110. Moulton GE. 1983-2001. Journals of the Lewis and Clark expedition. 13 volumes. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
111. Mulhern DM. 2002. Probable case of Binder syndrome in a skeleton from Quarai, New Mexico. Am J Phys Anthropol 118:371-377.
112. Mulhern DM, Jones EB. 2003. Evidence of subadult scurvy at Kagamil and Shiprock Islands, Alaska. Am J Phys Anthropol [Suppl] 36:155-156.
113. Mulhern DM, Ousley SD, Jones EB. 2001. The effects of pathology on biological affiliation. Am J Phys Anthropol [Suppl] 32:110.
114. Mulhern DM, Ortner DJ, Wilczak CA, Jones EB. 2005. Interpreting skeletal lesions at Hawikku: evidence for mycotic infection. Am J Phys Anthropol [Suppl] 40:154.
115. Mulhern DM, Wilczak CA, Dudar JC. Hyperostosis Frontalis interna: Implications of multiple occurence at Pueblo Bonito, New Mexico. Am J Phys Anthropol (in press).
116. National Park Service. 1993. Memorandum of January 13 from James Ridenour, Director, National Park Service to federal agency and museum officials and Indian tribe and Native Hawaiian Organization representatives. http://www.cr.nps.gov/NAGPRA/MANDATES/Summary_Inventory_memo_1_21_93.htm.
117. National Park Service. 2004. http://www.cr.nps.gov/nagpra/SPECIAL/ International.htm. Web document accessed April 2, 2004.
118. Notson WM. 1870. Letter to the Army Medical Museum accompanying remains, November 1870. Accession file 864, Army Medical Museum Records, National Anthropological Archives, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, DC.
119. O'Loughlin VD. 2004. Effects of different kinds of cranial deformation on the incidence of wormian bones. Am J Phys Anthropol 123:146-155.
120. Olson LA. 2003. Daubert update for questioned documents examiners. Proc Am Acad Forensic Sci 9:299.
121. Ortner DJ. 2002. Identification of pathological conditions in human skeletal remains. 2nd ed. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
122. Otis GA. 1880. List of the specimens in the anatomical section of the United States Army Medical Museum. Washington, DC: Army Medical Museum.
123. Ousley SD. 2000. New approaches to human variation and forensic anthropology (including repatriation). Proc Am Acad Forensic Sci 6:228.
124. Ousley SD. 2005. Biological anthropology in the Repatriation Osteology Laboratory, National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution. Abstracts of the 70th Annual Meeting. Washington, DC: Society for American Archaeology, p 224.
125. Ousley SD, Berger AE. 2001. Using postcranial discriminant functions to address museum, repatriation, and other forensic questions. Proc Am Acad Forensic Sci 7:265.
126. Ousley SD, Billeck WT. 2001. Assessing tribal identity in the Plains using nontraditional craniometrics (interlandmark distances). Am J Phys Anthropol [Suppl] 32:115-116.
127. Ousley SD, Billeck WT. 2003. The value of recording metric variation from remains subject to repatriation. Program of the Fifth World Archaeological Congress. Washington, DC: Archaeology and Ethnology Program, National Center for Cultural Resources, National Park Service, p 287.
128. Ousley SD, Hefner JT. 2005. Morphoscopic traits and the statistical determination of ancestry. Proc Am Acad Forensic Sci 11:291-292.
129. Ousley SD, Jantz RL. 1996. FORDISC 2.0: personal computer forensic discriminant functions. Knoxville: University of Tennessee.
130. Ousley SD, Jantz RL. 2002. Social races and human populations: why forensic anthropologists are good at identifying races. Am J Phys Anthropol [Suppl] 34:121.
131. Ousley SD, McKeown AH. 2001. Three dimensional digitizing of human skulls as an archival procedure. In: Williams E, editor. Human remains: conservation, retrieval and analysis. BAR international series 934. Oxford: Basingstoke Press, p 173-184.
132. Ousley SD, McKeown AH. 2003. A comparison of morphometric data and methods in classification. Am J Phys Anthropol [Suppl] 36:162.
133. Ousley SD, Owsley DW, Mulhern DM. 2000. Lost and found in the museum: repatriation, ancestry, ethnicity, and history. Am J Phys Anthropol [Suppl] 30:243.
134. Ousley SD, Seebauer JL, Jones EB. 2003. Forensic anthropology, repatriation, and the "Mongoloid" problem. Proc Am Acad Forensic Sci 9:245-246.
135. Owsley DW. 1996. Forensic anthropology and bioarcheology at the Smithsonian Institution. Cult Resource Management 19:21-24.
136. Owsley DW, Jantz RL. 1999. Databases for Paleo-American skeletal biology research. In: Bonnichsen R, editor. Who were the first Americans? Corvallis, OR: Center for the Study of the First Americans. p 79-96.
137. Owsley DW, Mann RW, Baugh TG. 1994. Culturally modified human bones from the Edwards I Site. In: Owsley DW, Jantz RL, editors. Skeletal biology in the Great Plains. Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution Press. p 363-375.
138. Parr RL, Carlyle SW, O'Rourke DH. 1996. Ancient DNA analysis of Fremont Amerindians of the Great Salt Lake Wetlands. Am J Phys Anthropol 99:507-518.
139. Pate FD, Brodie R, Owen TD. 2002. Determination of geographic origin of unprovenanced aboriginal skeletal remains in South Australia employing stable carbon and nitrogen isotope analysis. Aust Archaeol 55:1-7.
140. Pickering R, Jantz RL. 1994. Look again before repatriating: avoiding a moral and legal morass. Fed Archaeol 7:44.
141. Price HM. 1991. Disputing the dead: U.S. law on aboriginal remains and grave goods. Columbia: University of Missouri Press.
142. Reany D. 2005. Indian skull for sale on eBay may yet return to Monacans. News and Advance, Lynchburg, VA, February 21. (http://newsadvance.com/servlet/ Satellite?pagename=LNA/MG Article/LNA_BasicArticle&c=MGArticle&cid= 1031781050013 &path=)
143. Relethford JH, Blangero J. 1990. Detection of differential gene flow from patterns of quantitative variation. Hum Biol 62:5-25.
144. Reinhard KJ, Hastings D. 2003. Learning from the ancestors: the value of skeletal study. Am J Phys Anthropol [Suppl] 36:177.
145. Richman JR, Forsyth MP. 1994. Legal perspectives on cultural resources. Walnut Creek, CA: Altamira Press.
146. Riding In J. 1992. Six Pawnee Crania: The historical and contemporary significance of the massacre and decapitation of Pawnee Indians in 1869. American Indian Culture and Research Journal 16:101-117.
147. Rose JC, Green TJ, Green VD. 1996. NAGPRA is forever: osteology and the repatriation of skeletons. Annu Rev Anthropol 25:81-103.
148. Rosoff N. 1998. Integrating native views into museum procedures: hope and practice at the National Museum of the American Indian. Mus Anthropol 22:33-42.
149. Scheuer L. 2002. A blind test of mandibular morphology for sexing mandibles in the first few years of life. Am J Phys Anthropol 119:189-191.
150. Simms SR, Raymond AW. 1999. No one owns the deceased! The treatment of human remains from the three Great Basin cases. In: Hemphill BE, Larsen CS, editors. Prehistoric lifeways in the Great Basin Wetlands: bioarchaeological reconstruction and interpretation. Salt Lake City: University of Utah Press. p 8-20.
151. Smithsonian Institution. 2005a. http://www.sil.si.edu/Exhibitions/ Smithson-to-Smithsonian/will.htm, accessed April 1, 2005.
152. Smithsonian Institution. 2005b. http://www.sil.si.edu/Exhibitions/ Smithson-to-Smithsonian/1846act.htm, accessed April 1, 2005.
153. Steadman DW. 2003. Hard evidence: case studies in forensic anthropology. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
154. Steckel RH, Rose JC. 2002. The backbone of history: health and nutrition in the Western Hemisphere. New York: Cambridge University Press.
155. Steckel RH, Rose JC, Larsen CS, Walker PL. 2002. Skeletal health in the Western Hemisphere from 4000 B.C. to the present. Evol Anthropol 11:142-155.
156. Steeves PF. 2000. Mitochondral DNA tracking and typing of America's ancient cultures: establishing mtDNA markers for the Quapaw tribe. Honors thesis, Fulbright College Honors Department, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville.
157. Steponaitis VP. 2005. Discussant remarks on the symposium "Fifteen Years of NAGPRA in the United States and Beyond: Addressing Human Remains Collections and Repatriation." Abstracts of the 70th Annual Meeting. Washington, DC: Society for American Archaeology, p 279.
158. Stevenson KH. 1998. Statement of Katherine H. Stevenson, Associate Director, Cultural Resource Stewardship and Partnerships, National Park Service, Department of the Interior, before the House Committee on Resources, concerning H.R. 2893, a bill to amend the Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act to provide for appropriate study and repatriation of remains for which a cultural affiliation is not readily ascertainable. Hearing before the Committee on Resources, House of Representatives, One Hundred Fifth Congress, Second Session, on H.R. 2893, June 10 1998, Washington, D.C. http://www.cr.nps.gov/nagpra/MANDATES/HR2893-GRAVES_PROTECTION_ACT-6-10-98.pdf (accessed May 13, 2004).
159. Strong WD. 1940. From history to prehistory in the Northern Great Plains. In Essays in historical anthropology of North America, pp. 353-394. Smithsonian Miscellaneous Collections 100. Smithsonian Institution, Washington, D.C.
160. Thomas DH. 2000. Skull wars: Kennewick Man, archeology, and the battle for Native American identity. New York: Basic Books.
161. Thompson B. 2004. Spirit lodge. Washington Post, August 2. http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A33036-2004Aug1.html
162. Tigar JB. 2001. Age before duty: the conflict between legal and scientific standards when using ancient war-crime documents. Proc Am Acad Forensic Sci 7:153.
163. Turner CG, Utermohle CJ. 1990. The biological affiliation of human skeletal remains from Utqiavik. In: Hall ES, Fullerton L, editors. The 1981 excavations at the Utkiavik archaeological site, Barrow, Alaska. Barrow, AK: North Slope Borough Commission on Inupiat History, Language and Culture, p 454-461.
164. Ubelaker DH. 1990. Positive identification of American Indian skeletal remains from radiograph comparison. J Forensic Sci 35:466-472.
165. Ubelaker DH, Grant LG. 1989. Human skeletal remains: preservation or reburial? Yrbk Phys Anthropol 32:249-287.
166. Utermohle CJ. 1984. From Barrow eastward: cranial variation of the eastern Eskimo. Unpublished Ph.D dissertation, Department of Anthropology, Arizona State University.
167. Viotti V. 2004. Sale of Hawaiian skull draws federal charge. Honolulu Advertiser, September 9. http://www.moolelo.com/ebay-skull5.html.
168. Walker PL. 2004. Caring for the dead: finding a common ground in disputes over museum collections of human remains. In: Grupe G, Peters J, editors. Documenta archaeobiologiae 2: conservation policy and current research, yearbook of the State Collection of Anthropology and Palaeoanatomy. Rahden, Germany: Verlag M. Leidorf. p 13-27.
169. Weaver DS. 1980. Sex differences in the ilia of a known sex and age sample of fetal and infant skeletons. Am J Phys Anthropol 52:191-196.
170. West WR. 2000. Statement presented to the Committee on Indian Affairs, U.S. Senate, July 25, 2000. http://indian.senate. gov/2000hrgs/nagpra_0725/west. pdf
171. Wilczak CA, Ousley SD. 2005. Questioning the relationship of cranial deformation to ossicle formation: results from Hawikku. Am J Phys Anthropol [Suppl] 40:222.
172. Willey P. 1990. Prehistoric warfare on the Great Plains: skeletal analysis of the Crow Creek Massacre victims. New York: Garland Publishing.
173. Willey G, Phillips P. 1958. Method and theory in American archaeology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
174. Williams DA. 2003. Bite mark analysis in the time of Daubert. Proc Am Acad Forensic Sci 9:179.
175. Williams D. 2004. Pope returns relics to orthodox leader. Washington Post, November 28. http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A16875- 2004Nov27.html