The linear matching method for the shakedown analysis of geoctechnical problems

International Journal for Numerical and Analytical Methods in Geomechanics

Volumn 30, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 157-179

  Boulbibane, M ^a   Ponter, A R S ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LEICESTER   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Finite element methods; Linear matching method; Rolling contact problem; Shakedown theory

Indexed keywords

BOUNDARY CONDITIONS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; FINITE ELEMENT METHOD; HYDROSTATIC PRESSURE; LINEAR PROGRAMMING; SOIL MECHANICS;

LINEAR MATCHING METHOD; ROLLING CONTACT PROBLEM; SHAKEDOWN THEORY;

GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING;

BOUNDARY CONDITIONS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; FINITE ELEMENT METHOD; GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING; HYDROSTATIC PRESSURE; LINEAR PROGRAMMING; SOIL MECHANICS;

GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING; LINEARITY; NUMERICAL METHOD;

EID: 31944443529     PISSN: 03639061     EISSN: 10969853     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/nag.481     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Melan E. Zur plastizität des räumlichenkontinuums. Ingenieur Archiv 1938; 9:116-126.
2. Koiter WT. General theorems of elastic-plastic solids. In Progress in Solid Mechanics, Sneddon JN, Hill R (eds), vol. 1. North-Holland: Amsterdam, 1960; 167-221.
3. König JA. Shakedown of Elastic-plastic Structures. PWN-Polish Scientific Publishers: Warsaw, 1987.
4. Chinh PD. Shakedown kinematic theorem for elastic-perfectly plastic bodies. International Journal of Plasticity 2001; 17:773-780.
5. Maier G. Shakedown theory in perfect elasto-plasticity with associated and non-associated flow-lines: a finite element linear programming approach. Meccanica 1969; 4:250-260.
6. Yu HS, Hossain MZ. Lower bound shakedown analysis of layered pavements using discontinuous stress fields. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 1998; 167:209-222.
7. Kim J, Salgado R, Yu HS. Limit analysis of soil slopes subjected to pore-water pressures. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering (ASCE) 1999; 125:49-58.
8. Merifield RS, Sloan SW, YSH. Rigorous plasticity solutions for the bearing capacity of two-layered clays. Géotechnique 1999; 49(4):471-490.
9. Collins IF, Boulbibane M. Geotechnical analysis of unbound pavements based on shakedown theory. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering 2000; 126(1):50-59.
10. Maier G, Pastor J, Ponter ARS, Weichert D. Direct methods for limit and shakedown analysis. In Comprehensive Structural Integrity, de Borst R, Mang HA (eds), vol. 3. Elsevier Science: Oxford, 2003; 48pp.
11. Marriott DL. Evaluation of deformation or load control of stresses under inelastic condition using elastic finite element stress analysis. Proceedings of ASME Pressure Vessel and Piping Conference, PVP-136, 3-9, Pittsburgh, PA, 1998.
12. Ponter ARS, Chen H, Boulbibane M, Habibullah M. The linear matching method for the evaluation of limit loads, shakedown limits and related problems. In Proceedings of the Fifth World Congress on Computational Mechanics (WCCM V), Mang HA, Rammerstorfer FG, Eberhardsteiner J (eds), Vienna, Austria, Vienna University of Technology: Austria, 7-12 July 2002.
13. Ponter ARS, Fuschi P, Engelhardt M. Limit analysis for a general class of yield conditions. European Journal of Mechanics - A/Solids 2000; 19:401-421.
14. Ponter ARS, Engelhardt M. Shakedown limit for a general yield condition. European Journal of Mechanics - A/Solids 2001; 19:423-445.
15. Schofield A, Wroth P. Critical State Soil Mechanics. McGraw-Hill: New York, London, 1968.
16. Boulbibane M, Weichert D. Application of shakedown theory to soils with non-associated flow rules. Mechanical Research Communications 1997; 24(5):516-519.
17. Chen WF. Limit Analysis and Soil Plasticity. Elsevier Science: Amsterdam, 1975.
18. Ponter ARS, Hearle AD, Johnson KL. Application of the kinematical shakedown theorem to rolling and sliding point contacts. Journal of Mechanics and Physics of Solids 1985; 33(4):339-362.
19. Johnson KL. Contact Mechanics. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, MA, 1985.
20. Hamilton GM. Explicit equations for the stresses beneath a sliding spherical contact. Proceedings Institution of Mechanical Engineers 1983; 197:53-59.