A prospective comparative study to assess the accuracy of MRI versus HSG in tubouterine causes of female infertility

Middle East Fertility Society Journal

Volumn 10, Issue 3, 2005, Pages 250-257

  Malek, Khaled Abdel ^a   Hassan, Mohamed ^a   Soliman, Ahmed ^a   El sawah, Heba ^a   Azab, Amr Osama ^a  

^a CAIRO UNIVERSITY   (Egypt)

Author keywords

Hysterosalpingography; Infertility; Laparoscopy; Magnetic resonance imaging

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC ERROR; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; EGYPT; FEMALE; FEMALE INFERTILITY; HUMAN; HYSTEROSALPINGOGRAPHY; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; LAPAROSCOPY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; UTERINE TUBE DISEASE; UTERUS MALFORMATION;

EID: 31944441487     PISSN: 11105690     EISSN: 11105690     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Hornstein MD, Schust D. Infertility. In: Berek JS, Adashi EY, Hillard PA, eds. Novak's gynecology. 12th ed. Baltimore, Md: Williams & Wilkins, 1996; 915-962. 14.
2. Jones HW and Rock J. The infertile couple. N. Engl. J.Med. 1993; 329, 1710-1715.
3. De-Cherney AH. Hysterosalpingography. Fertil Steril 1986; 45, 582.
4. Schultz WW, van Andel P, Sabelis I, Mooyaart E. Magnetic resonance imaging of male and female genitals during coitus and female sexual arousal. BMJ. 1999 Dec 18; 319(7225): 1596-1600.
5. Smith RC, Reinhold C, Lauge RC, McCauley TR, Kier R and McCarthy S. Fast spin echo MR, imaging of the female pelvis. Radiol. 1992; 184, 665-669.
6. Kunz G, Beil D, Huppert P and Leyendecker G. Structural abnormalities of the uterine wall in women with endometriosis and infertility visualized by vaginal sonography and magnetic resonance imaging. HUM. Reprod. 2000; 15(1), 76-82.
7. Outwater EK, Siegelman ES, Chiowanich P, Kilger AM, Dunton CJ, Talerman A. Dilated fallopian tubes: MR imaging characteristics. Radiology 1998; 208:463-469.
8. Tukeva TA, Aronen HJ, Karjalainen PT, Molander P, Paavonen Tand Paavonen, J. MR imaging in pelvic inflammatory disease: comparison with laparoscopy and US. Radiology 1999; 210:209- 216
9. Ha HK, Lim GY, Cha ES, Lee HG, Ro HJ, Kim HS, et al. MR imaging of tubo-ovarian abscess. Acta Radiol 1995; 36:510-14.
10. Rock JA. Surgery for anomalies of the Müllerian ducts. In: Rock JA, Thompson JD, eds. Te Linde's operative gynecology. 8th ed. Philadelphia, Pa: Lippincott-Raven, 1997; 687-729.
11. The American Fertility Society classifications of adnexal adhesions, distal tubal occlusion, tubal occlusion secondary to tubal ligation, tubal pregnancies, Müllerian anomalies and intrauterine adhesions. Fertil Steril 1988; 49:944-955.
12. Strübbe EH, Willemsen WNP, Lemmens JAM, Thijn CJP, Rolland R. Mayer-Rokitansky-Küster- Hauser syndrome: distinction between two forms based on excretory urographic, sonographic, and laparoscopic findings. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1993; 160:331-334.
13. Brody JM, Koelliker SL, Fishman GN. Unicornuate uterus: imaging appearance, associated anomalies, and clinical implications. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1998; 171:1341-1347.
14. Fielding JR. MR imaging of Müllerian anomalies: impact on therapy. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1996; 167:1491-1495.
15. Thompson JD, Rock JA. Leiomyoma uteri and myomectomy. In: Rock JA, Thompson JD, eds. Te Linde's operative gynecology. 8th ed. Philadelphia, Pa: Lippincott-Raven, 1997; 731-770.
16. Togashi K, Ozasa H, Konishi I, et al. Enlarged uterus: differentiation between adenomyosis and leiomyoma with MR imaging. Radiology 1989; 171:531-534.
17. Ueda H, Togashi K, Konishi I. Unusual appearances of uterine leiomyomas: MR imaging, et al. g findings and their histopathologic backgrounds. RadioGraphics 1999; 19:131-145.
18. Seibel MM. Work-up of the infertile couple. In: Seibel MM, editor, Infertility a comprehensive text. Norwalk (CT): Appleton and large, 1990:1-21.
19. Zanetti, E, Ferrari, LR, Rossi, G. Classification and radiographic features of uterine malformations: hysteroscopic study. Br J Radiol 1978; 51:161-170.
20. Elchalal U, Schenker JG. Hysteroscopic resection of uterus septus versus abdominal metroplasty J Am Coll Surg 1994; 178:673-644.
21. Fayez JA. Comparison between abdominal and hysteroscopic metroplasty. Obstet Gynecol 1986; 68:399-403.
22. Green LK, Harris RE. Uterine anomalies: frequency of diagnosis and associated obstetric complications. Obstet Gynecol 1976; 47:427-433.
23. Winfield AC and Wentz AC. Diagnostic imaging of infertility, 1987.
24. Homer HA, Li TC and Cooke ID .The septate uterus: a review of management and reproductive outcome. Fertil. Steril. 2000; 73, 1-4.
25. Salim R, Regan L, Woelfer B, Backos M and Jurkovic DA. Comparative study of the morphology of congenital uterine anomalies in women with and without a history of recurrent first trimester miscarriage. Hum Reprod 2003; 18 (1): 162-6.
26. Murase E, Siegelman ES, Outwater EK, Perez-Jaffe LA, Tureck RW. Uterine Leiomyomas: histopathologic features, MR imaging findings, differential diagnosis, and treatment. Radiographics 1999; 19(5):1179-97.