Development of weighting factors in the context of LCIA

Journal of Cleaner Production

Volumn 14, Issue 6-7, 2006, Pages 649-660

  Soares, Sebastião R ^a,b   Toffoletto, Laurence ^a   Deschênes, Louise ^a  

^a ÉCOLE POLYTECHNIQUE DE MONTRÉAL   (Canada)

^b FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF SANTA CATARINA   (Brazil)

Author keywords

LCA; LCIA; MCDA; Panel approach; Resistance to change; Weighting

Indexed keywords

ECOSYSTEMS; ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING; LIFE CYCLE; WEIGHING;

LCA; LCIA; MCDA; PANEL APPROACH; RESISTANCE TO CHANGE;

PRODUCTION ENGINEERING;

EID: 31944434429     PISSN: 09596526     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2005.07.018     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. ISO 14042 Environmental management - life cycle assessment - life cycle impact assessment 2000 International Organization for Standardization Geneva
2. E. Hertwich, D. Pennington, and J. Bare Introduction A. Helias Udo de Haes Life-cycle impact assessment: striving towards best practice 2002 SETAC Press Pensacola, Florida
3. J. Seppälä, and R. Hämäläinen On the meaning of distance-to-target weighting method and normalization in life cycle impact assessment The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment 6 4 2001 211 218
4. K.M. Lee A weighting method for the Korean Eco-Indicator The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment 4 3 1999 161 165
5. M. Hauschild, and H. Wenzel Scientific background Environmental assessment of products vol. 2 1998 Chapman & Hall London, UK
6. Finnveden G. A critical review of operational valuation/weighting methods for life cycle assessment. AFR-REPORT 253 AFN, Naturvårdsverket Swedish Environmental Protection Agency 106 48 Stockholm, Sweden; 1999.
7. B. Steen A systematic approach to environmental priority strategies in product development (EPS) Version 2000 Models and data of the default 1999 Centre for environmental assessment of Product and Material systems (CPM) Göteborg, Sweden CPM report, 1999, 5
8. J. Seppälä, L. Basson, and G. Norris Decision analysis frameworks for life-cycle impact assessment Journal of Industrial Ecology 4 5 2001 45 68
9. W. Edwards How to use multiattribute utility measurement for social decision making IEEE Transaction on Systems, Man and Cybernetics SMC-7 1977 326 340
10. W. Edwards, and F.H. Barron Smarts and smarter: improved simple methods for multiattribute utility measurement Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 60 1994 306 325
11. D. Von Winterfeldt, and W. Edwards Decision analysis and behavioral research 1986 Cambridge University Press Cambridge, MA
12. E. Beinat Value functions for environmental management 1997 Kluwer Academic Publishers Norwell, MA, USA
13. R. Keeney, and H. Raiffa Decision with multiple objectives: preferences and value trade-offs 1976 Wiley New York
14. M. Pöyhönem, and R. Hämäläinen On the convergence of multiattribute weighting methods European Journal of Operational Research 129 2001 569 585
15. T. Saaty The analytic hierarchy process 1980 MacGraw Hill New York
16. Cziner K, Tuomaala M, Hurme M. Multicriteria decision making in process integration. Journal of Cleaner Production 2005;13(5):475-83.
17. Hinkle D. The change of personal constructs from the viewpoint of a theory of construct implications. Ph.D. dissertation, Ohio State University; 1965.
18. M. Rogers, and M. Bruen A new system for weighting environmental criteria for use within ELECTRE III European Journal of Operational Research 107 1998 552 563
19. C. Bana e Costa, and J.C. Vansnick The Macbeth approach: basic ideas, software and an application N. Meskens M. Roubens Advances in decision analysis 1999 Kluwer Academic Publishers Dordrecht 131 157
20. C. Bana e Costa, and M. Chagas A career choice problem: an example of how to use Macbeth to build a quantitative value model based on qualitative value judgment European Journal of Operational Research 153 2004 323 331
21. J. Simos Evaluer l'impact sur l'environnement: une approche originale par l'analyse multicritère et la négociation 1990 Presses polytechniques et universitaires romandes Lausanne
22. J. Figueira, and B. Roy Determining the weights of criteria in Electre type methods with a revised Simo's procedure European Journal of Operational Research 139 2002 317 326
23. M. Goedkoop, S. Effting, and M. Collignon The eco-indicator 99 - a damage orientated method for life cycle impact assessment. Manual for designers 17-4-2000 2nd ed. 2000 PRéConsultants B.V. Amersfoort The Netherlands
24. A. Blouet, and D. Riveraine Ecobilan: les produits et leurs impacts sur l'environnement 1995 Dunod Paris
25. E. Lindeijer Normalization and valuation Udo de Haes Towards a methodology for life cycle impact assessment 1996 SETAC Brussels
26. G. Finnveden, P. Hofstetter, J. Bare, L. Basson, A. Ciroth, and T. Mettier Normalization, grouping and weighting in life-cycle impact assessment A. Helias Udo de Haes Life-cycle impact assessment: striving towards best practice 2002 SETAC Press Pensacola, Florida
27. J. Noh, and K.M. Lee Weighting approach of impact categories using the multi-criteria decision making method The fifth international conference on ecobalance 2002 Japan
28. H. Wenzel, M. Hauschild, and L. Alting Methodology, tools and case studies in product development Environmental assessment of products vol. 1 2000 Kluwer Academic Publishers Norwell, MA, USA
29. N. Itsubo, A. Inaba, Y. Matsuno, I. Yasui, and R. Yamamoto Current status of weighting methodologies in Japan The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment 5 1 2000 5 11
30. S. Volkwein, R. Gihr, and W. Klöpffer The valuation step within LCA. Part II: a formalized method of prioritization by expert panels The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment 1 4 1996 182 192
31. ISO 14040 Environmental management - life cycle assessment - principles and framework 1997 International Organization for Standardization Geneva