Environmental and wider implications of political impediments to environmental tax reform

Energy Policy

Volumn 34, Issue 8, 2006, Pages 960-970

  Clinch, J Peter ^a   Dunne, Louise ^a   Dresner, Simon ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY COLLEGE DUBLIN   (Ireland)

^b POLICY STUDIES INSTITUTE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Ecological tax reform; Europe; Social acceptability

Indexed keywords

ECOLOGY; ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL EFFECTS; ECONOMICS; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT; PUBLIC POLICY;

ECOLOGICAL TAX REFORM; HYPOTHECATION; REVENUE; SOCIAL ACCEPTABILITY;

TAXATION;

ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS; ENVIRONMENTAL TAX; PUBLIC ATTITUDE; TAX REFORM;

EID: 31844440999     PISSN: 03014215     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2004.08.048     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. A.B. Baranzini J. Goldembergy S. Speck A future for carbon taxes Ecological Economics 32 2000 395-412
2. Baron, R., 1996. Economic/Fiscal Instruments: Competitiveness Issues Related to Carbon/Energy Taxation Policies and Measures for Common Action Working Paper 14. Annex 1 Expert Group on the UN FCCC.
3. Baron, R., 1997. Economic/Fiscal Instruments: Competitiveness Issues Related to Carbon/Energy Taxation Policies and Measures for Common Action Working Paper 14. Annex I Expert Group on the UN FCCC.
4. Berkhout, drs. P.H.G., ms. drs. MS. A. Ferrer-i-Carbonell en drs. A.C. Muskens (2001): Het effect van de REB op huishoudelijk energiegevruik, een econometrische analyse, eindrapport, SEO, Amsterdam, 2001 (in Dutch).
5. B. Bosquet Environmental tax reform Does it work? A survey of the empirical evidence Ecological Economics 34 1 2000 19-32
6. C. Böhringer T.F. Rutherford Carbon taxes with exemptions in an open economy A general equilibrium analysis of the German tax initiative Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 32 1997 189-203
7. Brunello, G., 1995. Labour market institutions and the double dividend hypothesis: An application of the WARM model. Nota di Lavoro, Environmental Policy No. 3.95. Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei, Milan.
8. J.P. Clinch F.J. Convery E. Fitzgerald S. Rooney Economic instruments for sustainable development Improving the xternal and working environments 1999 Office for Official Publications of the European Communities Luxembourg
9. J.P. Clinch J.D. Healy Domestic energy efficiency in Ireland Correcting market failure Energy Policy 28 1 2000 1-8
10. Convery, F.J., 2001. Lessons for policy design and execution-environmental taxation in Europe. Mimeo, Department of Environmental Studies, University College Dublin.
11. DIW, 2001. Modellgestützte Analyse der ökologischen Steuerreform mit LEAN, PANTA RHEI und dem Potsdamer Mikrosimulationsmodell. http://www.diw.de/deutsch/produkte/publikationen/ diskussionspapiere/jahrgang01/.
12. DMU, 2001. Sådan står det til med miljøet. http://www.dmu.dk/1_Nyt/2_Presse/63.asp.
13. Ecotec, 2001. Study on the economic and environmental implications of the use of environmental taxes and charges in the European Union and its member states. In association with CESAM, CLM, University of Gothenburg, UCD, IEEP http://europa.eu.int/comm/environment/enveco/taxation/ environmental_taxes.htm.
14. EEB, 2003. The European environmental bureau campaign on environmental fiscal reform. www.eeb.org.
15. P. Ekins Economic growth and environmental sustainability Prospects for Green Growth 1999 Routledge London
16. Ekins, P., Speck, S., 1998. Database on environmental taxes in the European union member States, plus Norway and Switzerland: Evaluation of environmental effects of environmental taxes. Final Report, European Commission, Brussels.
17. D. Fullerton G.E. Metcalf Environmental taxes and the double dividend hypothesis Did you really expect something for nothing? Chicago-Kent Law Review 73 189 1998 221-256
18. Godal, O., Holtsmark, B., 1998. Distribution of costs under different regulation schemes in Norway. Working Paper 1998, vol. 8, Centre for International Climate and Environmental Research, Oslo.
19. 2 abatement policies Resource and Energy Economics 21 3-4 1999 211-253
20. Hourcade, J.C., 1996. Estimating the costs of mitigating greenhouse gases. In:, Bruce, J.P., Haites, E.F. (Eds.), Climate Change 1995: Economic and Social Dimensions of Climate Change. Contribution of Working Group III to the Second Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
21. Johannsen, K., Togeby, M., 1998. Evaluation of the Danish agreement scheme. Paper presented at CAVA Workshop, The Worldwide Use of Voluntary Approaches: State of the Art and National Patterns, Gent, Belgium, 26-27 November 1998.
22. Johansson, B., 2000. The carbon tax in Sweden. In: OECD, Innovation and the Environment. OECD, Paris.
23. Koopman, G.J., 1994. Eco-taxes and employment in Europe-under which conditions can an employment benefit from green fiscal reform be expected? Paper presented at the European Roundtable on the Co-operation and Role of the Social Partners in the Environment, Dublin, 21-22 September 1994.
24. Linderhof, V., 2001. Household demand for energy, water and the collection of waste, a micro-econometric analyses. Rijksuniversiteit, Groningen.
25. Nordic Council of Ministers, 1996. Environmental Protection and Employment in Nordic Countries, Copenhagen.
26. NOU, 1996:9. The Norwegian Green Tax Commission: Policies for a better environment and high employment.
27. OECD, 1999. Consumption Tax Trends. OECD, Paris. www.oecd.org/env/.
28. Patuelli, R., Pels, E., Nijkamp, P., 2002. Environmental tax reform and the double dividend. Tinbergen Institute Discussion Paper. http://www.tinbergen.nl/.
29. M.E. Porter America's green strategy Scientific American 264 4 1991 96
30. M. Porter C. Van Der Linde Toward a new conception of the environment-competitiveness relationship Journal of Economic Perspectives 9 4 1995 97-118
31. Scott, S., 2001. Mobilising the market to shape environmental performance: Experience in Ireland. Presented at the Rio+10 Achievement and Challenge Conference in Ireland, vol. 24. November 2001, University College Dublin, Dublin.
32. Southern California Edison, 2001. www.sce.com.
33. T. Sterner The Market and the Environment-The Effectiveness of Market-Based Policy Instruments for Environmental Reform 1999 Edward Elgar Cheltenham
34. Swedish Green Tax Commission, 1997. Taxation, Environment, and Employment. Fritzes, Stockholm.